NCAA Football 11 Video: "Preliminary" Dynasty Team Ratings

[smlmeyer]

I wanted to come on and make a sarcastic comment about how I was mad that "Custom Conferences" was tied to the Y button, maybe lighten the mood a bit, but I got swept up as well.

[sinc79]

Quote: Originally Posted by J-Unit40

So they are a 99 on offense based on ONE game in 2009? You still can't be serious. 98-99 should be reserved for offensive juggernauts that come once or twice in a decade. Not Alabama in 2010. We see this every year with EA. UGA was loaded with 99s not too long ago and we all know how that turned out. Big picture: Not a big deal. Just found it comical.

Offense has everyone back. My question is about their defense, how can a defense with like 3-4 returning starters be 99? Must be putting a lot of stock in those underclassmen.

[duckfever8]

Washington an 89?!! I know Locker is good, but Washington is not in the top half of the Pac-10. Atleast Oregon is #4, so it's all good

[Blkcanes]

Quote: Originally Posted by MWillard2

Ill be doing that on PS3 most likely. I usually have the roster totally re-rated for every team by a month after the game released.

How long do you think it would take to do that, I could just hold out from getting the game until someone makes a roster.

[Scott812313]

Seems like almost all of the top 25 teams ratings are awfully high across the board. OSU with 97 offense and Bama with 99 offense and defense is quite absurd.

[IGGYBOY34]

Quote: Originally Posted by duckfever8

Washington an 89?!! I know Locker is good, but Washington is not in the top half of the Pac-10. Atleast Oregon is #4, so it's all good

How do you figure Washington is not in the top half of the Pac-10? What teams are better? Wash was 4-5 in conference play last year in their first year under a new coach. Of their 5 losses, only 3 were quite convincing (Oregon - who has since lost their star QB, Oregon St, and Stanford - both of whom have been consistently solid as of late). USC is on the ropes (and they beat USC last year).They lost @UCLA by 1 point and lost @Arizona St by one TD. I'm not necessarily a Pac 10 guy, but in my opinion based on what I saw last season, I think the only teams I'd pencil into the top of the Pac 10 are Stanford, Oregon St, and Oregon. I think Washington has just as good a shot as any of the remaining teams - especially with Locker having a full year now to get Sarkisian's system down. What do you think?

[BamaBruce]

Quote: Originally Posted by J-Unit40

Bama is a 99 in offense? Seriously?

eh.... with Richardson, Ingram McElroy, Jones, Maze, and so on, the LEAST that we could have would probably be a 97 lol....

[Scott812313]

Quote: Originally Posted by BamaBruce

eh.... with Richardson, Ingram McElroy, Jones, Maze, and so on, the LEAST that we could have would probably be a 97 lol....

McElroy is nothing more than a game manager that is fortunate enough to have an absolutely stellar running game and defense. Jones is all hype. Obviously he plays on a running team with a below average Qb, but even when he gets chances to produce he doesn't take advantage. Funny he was ranked higher than AJ Green and Michael Floyd coming into college, both those guys have been miles better than him in their careers.