Oraeon coaching slider update

[Oraeon1224]

After another thread questioning the use of overall pass/run ratios I decided that the author was correct and that full game stats are misleading because many teams are up in the second half and therefore run the ball more. This does not reflect their true playcalling and creates misleadingly high % of run plays. Similarly teams that are down frequently may pass more creating falsely high pass plays. Luckily CFBstats has the 1st half run/pass % of every NCAA team. I feel the first half more reflects a teams strategy as that team is much less likely to have current game situation impact their playcalling. Hopefully EA's AI does adapt to the score with more run or pass depending on the 4th quarter score. Hope these are of use (if you compare you see that the pass % of many teams is higher than my prior posting):

Name	1st half % Pass Left side of slider	1st half % Rushes Right side of slider
Air Force	22%	78%
Akron	48%	52%
Alabama	50%	50%
Arizona	56%	44%
Arizona State	55%	45%
Arkansas	57%	43%
Arkansas State	51%	49%
Army	17%	83%
Auburn	40%	60%
Ball State	45%	55%
Baylor	54%	46%
Boise State	57%	43%
Boston College	43%	57%
Bowling Green	54%	46%
Buffalo	45%	55%
BYU	46%	54%
California	43%	57%
Central Michigan	55%	45%
Cincinnati	55%	45%
Clemson	50%	50%
Colorado	43%	57%
Colorado State	50%	50%
Connecticut	44%	56%
Duke	55%	45%
East Carolina	62%	38%
Eastern Michigan	32%	68%
Florida	46%	54%
Florida Atlantic	48%	52%
Florida International	41%	59%
Florida State	48%	52%
Fresno State	44%	56%
Georgia	47%	53%
Georgia Tech	17%	83%
Hawai'i	72%	28%
Houston	53%	47%
Idaho	59%	41%
Illinois	33%	67%
Indiana	61%	39%
Iowa	46%	54%
Iowa State	46%	54%
Kansas	44%	56%
Kansas State	31%	69%
Kent State	54%	46%
Kentucky	53%	47%
Louisiana Tech	49%	51%
Louisiana-Lafayette	52%	48%
Louisiana-Monroe	46%	54%
Louisville	48%	52%
LSU	39%	61%
Marshall	55%	45%
Maryland	52%	48%
Memphis	46%	54%
Miami (Florida)	48%	52%
Miami (Ohio)	55%	45%
Michigan	39%	61%
Michigan State	48%	52%
Middle Tennessee	45%	55%
Minnesota	41%	59%
Mississippi	39%	61%
Mississippi State	36%	64%
Missouri	56%	44%
Navy	15%	85%
Nebraska	32%	68%
Nevada	41%	59%
New Mexico	40%	60%
New Mexico State	43%	57%
North Carolina	54%	46%
North Carolina State	59%	41%
North Texas	38%	62%
Northern Illinois	40%	60%
Northwestern	42%	58%
Notre Dame	56%	44%
Ohio	36%	64%
Ohio State	49%	51%
Oklahoma	58%	42%
Oklahoma State	57%	43%
Oregon	49%	51%
Oregon State	50%	50%
Penn State	50%	50%
Pittsburgh	47%	53%
Purdue	44%	56%
Rice	42%	58%
Rutgers	43%	57%
San Diego State	57%	43%
San Jose State	52%	48%
SMU	57%	43%
South Carolina	48%	52%
South Florida	40%	60%
Southern Mississippi	48%	52%
Stanford	48%	52%
Syracuse	43%	57%
TCU	44%	56%
Temple	43%	57%
Tennessee	51%	49%
Texas	47%	53%
Texas A&M	52%	48%
Texas Tech	59%	41%
Toledo	48%	52%
Troy	55%	45%
Tulane	49%	51%
Tulsa	54%	46%
UAB	55%	45%
UCF	37%	63%
UCLA	36%	64%
UNLV	44%	56%
USC	51%	49%
Utah	55%	45%
Utah State	37%	63%
UTEP	53%	47%
Vanderbilt	42%	58%
Virginia	51%	49%
Virginia Tech	41%	59%
Wake Forest	37%	63%
Washington	47%	53%
Washington State	49%	51%
West Virginia	48%	52%
Western Kentucky	36%	64%
Western Michigan	56%	44%
Wisconsin	37%	63%
Wyoming	42%	58%

[burritos13]

thank you very much good sir!

[SECElit3]

You are the man! Oraeon, Phenomenal work!

[chia51]

Quote: Originally Posted by Oraeon1224

After another thread questioning the use of overall pass/run ratios I decided that the author was correct and that full game stats are misleading because many teams are up in the second half and therefore run the ball more. This does not reflect their true playcalling and creates misleadingly high % of run plays. Similarly teams that are down frequently may pass more creating falsely high pass plays. Luckily CFBstats has the 1st half run/pass % of every NCAA team. I feel the first half more reflects a teams strategy as that team is much less likely to have current game situation impact their playcalling. Hopefully EA's AI does adapt to the score with more run or pass depending on the 4th quarter score. Hope these are of use (if you compare you see that the pass % of many teams is higher than my prior posting):

Last year the AI adapted after each score, with a bigger change at half. At least that's what I noticed... I haven't paid to much attention this year so far... but will start to look now, will test against a moderately heavy running team (Nebraska).

[chia51]

But yes I agree that the 1st half %'s would be better to go with than the overall. Since that is more than likely what the team is trying to do.

What about merging the two %'s... first half % and whole game %.

[ren6175]

Sorry, if this was already addressed, but in order to make this 100% effective do I need to edit the Head Coach and the Offensive Coordinator or just one or the other?

Thanks.

[miamikris]

Quote: Originally Posted by ren6175

Sorry, if this was already addressed, but in order to make this 100% effective do I need to edit the Head Coach and the Offensive Coordinator or just one or the other? Thanks.

I was wondering that too,I been assuming both

[fldash]

Just HC, but you can do both if you want...