No NBA Player or Roster Editing in NBA Live 16 Confirmed

[I Djm]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rockie_Fresh88

editing will not lead to more sales than the pro am mode you're kidding yourself if you think otherwise . I've played basketball games with some many people my age (22) and younger and all they care about is park , my team , and quick match

Well they are dudebros............uploadfromtaptalk1439646948959.jpg

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

[I Djm]

Quote: Originally Posted by vtcrb

Never said that. All this "MY" stuff is what drives your age group. And that is fine. What i was saying is that by Adding Editing, we could have so many more options to choose from in Rosters, making the Longevity of the game last Longer. We could ADD back Legends/College/High School/Fictional/FIBA Players that USERs, including the Younger Generation would enjoy. IF Servers go down, what are you going to do with the Game? Having your CORE Modes attached to ON-Line is a Issue waiting to happen. Look at the Backlash when guys cant get on Servers. Basically the game is USELESS.

Tell em again B!!! uploadfromtaptalk1439647008337.gif

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

[Muzyk23]

So.. no editing, but what about cameras? Will we have more options to choose from and more camera angles this year? Does anyone know anything? Not being able to zoom in or out or having just 4 or 5 cameras to choose from is extremely weak.

[vtcrb]

My reasoning for adding editing: http://theeditorscorner.com/forum/thread-1686.html

I dont want to drive the DEVs away from OS, so feel free to comment there as well, as I am Tweeting the DEVs.

[WTF]

Quote: Originally Posted by mlp111

why does everyone keep saying this game was built from scratch... that's so not truth. the game is still built of code of elite 11 and thus far......

I didn't say it was built from scratch, but a ton of the code was. When you omit it in the earlier games, and add new code on top, it gets more difficult to code in.

It stinks, I know. Big time. I have asked til I'm blue in the face. Unfortunately, for those like us, we aren't getting what we desire. But for the games own good, they put the resources where it needed to go, to cater to that crowd.

[Mauer4MVP]

I just don't get it. Does Live even want to compete? I mean I'll admit, I think 2k has been superior for a long time, but it looked like the graphics were improved and it was finally establishing something that the Live followers would like.

And then they go ahead and do this...

[KingTocco]

I've just been sitting back and reading a lot of the comments, some of them are funny to me.

It went from OH MAN IM SO HYPE to Dude EA is awful this is a definite NO to me.

Is there no middle ground? Can't you all just at least try the demo they are giving us and see if you like it. I'm sure if the gameplay is tight you can find some things you like about this game.

I've always been a 2K guy myself but I like Live too and want them both to be successful. I just hate seeing all the absolutes in here.

Just a thought


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LionsFanNJ]

^ I agree with the sentiment to try it. However for me, if the franchise modes aren't up to par with the things i like/need/want, then i really don't want to play. It ends up being a bunch of exhibition games that i'll lose interest in very quickly no matter how good it is on court.