NBA Live 14 Ultimate Team Details

[BizDevConglomerate]

Quote: Originally Posted by SoAwesome

I think both player rating scales are bad. 2k all over the place, while Live too bunched together. Both need big improvements.

Think you hit the nail on the head. But, after a month we will see the ratings make proper adjustments. The ratings aren't controlled by brains, it's done by the actual stats. So the ratings will only affect tendencies.

As for a PF VS. PG we can't compare the two. The PG is the QB on the team, where the PF is the DE or OT. They have different strengths. John wall did get pref. Treatment imo. But he's nice. Lil hint put him at SG on 2k And trade em lol. Bigger returns.

[yaboythecib]

Quote: Originally Posted by PiNOYPANDEMiK

Blake Griffin is a top10 PF easily, so I don't know what you are talking about. John Wall on the other hand should not be considered better than Blake Griffin. Seriously Blake Griffin an 84 and Wall 85? I know it's only a video game, but those numbers pretty much says John Wall is more valuable than Blake. If CP3 is an 88 and Wall (who is not even a top10 pg in the game) is an 85, then what about the other pg's that are better than Wall? You're telling me we have a lot of PG's in the 85-88 ratings? Terrible.

both of them was are subpar at there poistions......both of us don't really have a case for either of them agreed..

[DIRK41NOWITZKI]

In one of the pictures it says 2001 draft class......hmm..... With a draft class in the 2000 era we could maybe see players like VC, Reggie, TMAC? Lets hope so.

[royounggoku]

Quote: Originally Posted by DIRK41NOWITZKI

In one of the pictures it says 2001 draft class......hmm..... VC? Reggie? TMAC? Lets hope so.

But none of those people were drafted in 2001

[DIRK41NOWITZKI]

Quote: Originally Posted by royounggoku

But none of those people were drafted in 2001

Yes I understand that, I'm just speculating on possible players that could be in the game with a draft class in the 2000's. If they had teams with players from 2000 and up then players like VC, TMAC, and Reggie would most likely be in the game.

[PiNOYPANDEMiK]

Quote: Originally Posted by westview33

Blake is a top 10 PF in terms of dunking the ball.But he's sub par in rebounding, defense and creating any offense outside of a dunk.So why would it be a crime for him to be a 84 when he plays no defense, doesn't rebound and can;t hit a shot without dunking?Unless of course your one of those guys who only watch highlights and dunking is all that counts when rating a player.

One of the dumbest statements I've read on any basketball message boards. Blake Griffin's rebounding per game over his career is 10.5 RPG. How the hell is that sub par rebounding? He had less rebounds last year because he played significantly less minutes.

I never said he deserved to be rated higher. I actually think his ratings is perfect for him. Considering all the other stars like CP3 and Melo seems to be at 87-89. What I did have a problem with was John Wall rated higher than Blake and closer to CP3. Dude sucks at everything besides his ability to push the tempo and finish in the fast break.

[PiNOYPANDEMiK]

Quote: Originally Posted by yaboythecib

both of them was are subpar at there poistions......both of us don't really have a case for either of them agreed..

Blake Griffin subpar at his position? WTF? 18/8 is subpar in today's game now?

[royounggoku]

With all these big names in the 80's I wonder what Lebron rating is. I'm guessing like 94