NBA 2K9 Screenshots: Player Ratings

[ryumeijin]

posey 84, kirilenko 80? even though ak47 struggled last year i would always pick him over posey... and rondo at 83 IMO is high.. champs do get a lot of love... lol..

[GSW]

Damn,

OS has gone downhill.

[stillatin]

Quote: Originally Posted by ImmortalD24

All of those players are clearly better than Iverson. Iverson was drafted the same year Kobe was drafted.. the same exact miles on both players(Kobe actually has more miles since he played more playoff games and had carried weaker teams).. Eric Snow has always been nothing more than a role player and has been past his prime for years.. while many suggested Iverson is not even remotely falling off his game and would produce as much with a defensive team... this was said by many nba commentators just last season... Kobe at 2003>>> now IMO, but he's still the best player in the league... Because his prime years(25-33) was with the Sixers...... What does Shaq have to do with anything?? Obviously Shaq was the best player in 2000.. but we're talking about today's lakers vs iversons 76ers/lebrons current cavs... Anybody who watched both series would admit that the Cavs were a better matchup against the Celtics zone defense and strong perimeter play.. The Lakers outside of Kobe have defensive liabilities at every single position.. and remember the Lakers were also missing their starting center who was also their second best defender. When did I bring up Shaq?

dude said kobe was carrying more weak teams than iverson.....what in the hell have you been smoking?

[Stumbleweed]

Sweet, my dude J.R. Smith at 80 with an A for outside shooting and Kleiza bumped up to 76.

[X*Cell]

Zo is an 82... Kurt Thomas is an 80...?

what the hell was this ratings guy smoking?

[M.I.M.L.]

Quote: Originally Posted by Brolic

You've been here much longer than I have, so you would know what this site use to be like, but yeah, I joined for the simple fact that a friend said that this is a great site for sports video game discussion, but all I've seen thus far since joining is bitchin about stupid ****, over analyzing, and people who try to make it seem like they aren't biased fanboys, but it couldn't be more obvious. Now I've only been here for a month so I'm waiting to see if things get better, but this is not what I thought this site would be.

the os has always over analyzed things especially when it comes to 2k, really it is just a video game but this game has evolved into something so real(starting with 2k7) people come to expect for everything in the real game to be in the video game, but i must say

i feel the criticism here goes a long way into making the game that os will be satisfied with

i think it started when 2k4 came out, the series was going in a bad direction now i dont think 2k can do anything but get better

[CelticBalla32]

You guys think this is bad?

Ha. Go visit the 2k boards, then come back here to OS. It'll be a breath of fresh air.

[ehh]

Quote: Originally Posted by Brolic

You've been here much longer than I have, so you would know what this site use to be like, but yeah, I joined for the simple fact that a friend said that this is a great site for sports video game discussion, but all I've seen thus far since joining is bitchin about stupid ****, over analyzing, and people who try to make it seem like they aren't biased fanboys, but it couldn't be more obvious. Now I've only been here for a month so I'm waiting to see if things get better, but this is not what I thought this site would be.

All things pro basketball (the NBA forum or the 2K/Live forums) are always the worst on OS. Cept maybe the Madden forum around release time.