Park Rep Should Be Soley Based On Winning Games

[cablexdeadpool]

I don't know why Park is based on how many games you play.

Park Rep should be based on how many games you win and the your winning percentage.

At least that way it makes some sense.

You got guys running around with massive losing records and high rep.

[AshamanCarnage]

Quote: Originally Posted by cablexdeadpool

I don't know why Park is based on how many games you play. Park Rep should be based on how many games you win and the your winning percentage. At least that way it makes some sense. You got guys running around with massive losing records and high rep.

So if you play a really good game but your teammates just couldn't do anything and you lose because of it...you're just out of luck? Sounds awful.

[Inzombniac]

To add onto the above, it would just encourage people to be even more selfish in terms of scoring because teammate grade wouldn't matter as much like it does now. It's already bad enough as it is when you play with randoms who decide to try and take 90% of the shot then give it to you when they got nothing and the shot clock is running down.

I think it's based off of teammate grade more than anything else. I can win games and get very little rep for a C+ grade but I can lose games and get a ton of rep for a A+. I do think however to your point think that win streaks should contribute to more rep. If you go on a 10-20 game win streak, you should be getting more and more rep each time for it. I've never noticed a difference with a streak and it seems like it just gives you the same rep and VC. That way it rewards the whole team for doing something good while rewarding winning as well.

[Ownal0t]

my record is negative due to teammates not knowing how to play ball + 2k being 2k more than my own faults. (when I'm actually trying)

if we ran your idea all people would do is squad up with unbeatable squads, avoid playing anyone who seem decent and would just cheese all damn game and park would be more serious than a GB FINALS MATCH.

[Thunderhorse]

Nah, keep it how it is.

If you're winning games at a high enough percentage anyway, you'll get the higher rep faster than someone who is losing games at the same rate you're winning them.

It's a grind, but they are rewarding the guys who stay out there in the park all day.

[Mike2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by Thunderhorse

Nah, keep it how it is. If you're winning games at a high enough percentage anyway, you'll get the higher rep faster than someone who is losing games at the same rate you're winning them. It's a grind, but they are rewarding the guys who stay out there in the park all day.

You can play walk on pro am and get more park rep there than from park lol that's how i became a superstar so quick

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

[Mike2001]

But yeah that's a bad idea. In 16 i had a losing record because i played with alot of randoms than friends, in 17 i play with mostly friends but occasionally randoms and i have a better record this yr than last

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

[Jhawkfootball06]

They need to reintroduce the "Hold Ball for Too Long" grade deduction in MyPark, at least for 3 on 3 games. If it's already there, make the time shorter.

Make it so that if anybody has the ball for let's say 8 seconds or longer in the red areas, they get a grade deduction.