NBA 2K16 Player Ratings & Screenshots - Day Four: Kobe, Wall, Ross & More

[LD2k]

Quote: Originally Posted by 23

Personal confession right there folks. I'll translate. BEDs had no choice. He couldn't go under 85

I told Stauff, if he does this, he gets no pink diamonds.

[King_B_Mack]

Good question on the jersey customization front. In the last few 2Ks they've been including those special team patches when teams wear them that season. However those patches which are meant to be there for one season are pretty much there forever in our games. With the new customization tools at our disposal, I wonder if we'll be able to remove those patches after the season they're meant to commemorate or even add our own special patches to the current jerseys to celebrate special seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ojandpizza]

LeBron dropped off somewhat with his extremely high shooting efficiencies.. But man after the finals I can't imagine a 94 being fair.

Curious to what TT's rebounding ratings are. LeBron out-rebounded him (and everyone else in the finals) even with Thompson being much closer to the basket more often that Bron, but I'm sure his rebounding ratings are slightly too low again like they always are.

Interesting what his guard capabilities are as well. Averaged more assists than anyone in the finals as well with his top 2 scorers OUT, and JR shooting about as well as Shaq does. Also less turnovers than Curry despite his ridiculous usage rate and playing against the top defense in the league.

I'm just not sure man. He was putting up stats like guys from the damn 60's in today's league, and against the best defense in the league, and drops to a 94 because his shooting percentages was a littler lower? So are we going to lower MJ for the year he played Seattle and his shooting/turnovers were ridiculous?

I get it that he's declined some from his "freakish" athletic stage, but he's still a top 5 athlete in the league. Feels like he's being over penalized ever since he left being the cover boy. Especially considering you simulate a season and he averages like 21, 5, 5.. 2K being fishy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Eman5805]

Not sure why this matters so much. These overalls aren't set in stone. Soon as some games are played, things will be adjusted accordingly.

[SteveQ]

Quote: Originally Posted by ojandpizza

LeBron dropped off somewhat with his extremely high shooting efficiencies.. But man after the finals I can't imagine a 94 being fair. Curious to what TT's rebounding ratings are. LeBron out-rebounded him (and everyone else in the finals) even with Thompson being much closer to the basket more often that Bron, but I'm sure his rebounding ratings are slightly too low again like they always are. Interesting what his guard capabilities are as well. Averaged more assists than anyone in the finals as well with his top 2 scorers OUT, and JR shooting about as well as Shaq does. Also less turnovers than Curry despite his ridiculous usage rate and playing against the top defense in the league. I'm just not sure man. He was putting up stats like guys from the damn 60's in today's league, and against the best defense in the league, and drops to a 94 because his shooting percentages was a littler lower? So are we going to lower MJ for the year he played Seattle and his shooting/turnovers were ridiculous? I get it that he's declined some from his "freakish" athletic stage, but he's still a top 5 athlete in the league. Feels like he's being over penalized ever since he left being the cover boy. Especially considering you simulate a season and he averages like 21, 5, 5.. 2K being fishy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I still feel he is the best in the league but honestly he did not have a good showing in the Finals. 94 for him is perfect. Keeping him the current best player while making him beatable.

[SteveQ]

Quote: Originally Posted by Eman5805

Not sure why this matters so much. These overalls aren't set in stone. Soon as some games are played, things will be adjusted accordingly.

Yeah and this too, people seem to forget that the ratings are always changing.

[derrtyRedd]

Quote: Originally Posted by redsox4evur

OK...I'm just comparing two players who put up decent numbers for a bad team. Or a better player is Kevin Martin. Played in a close amount games 39, averaged 20 ppgs, right around 3 apg and 3 rpg. Should he be close to an 80, in your opinion?

I'd give him a 73.....75 tops, capable of being a great bench scorer, but he's lacking majorly on the defense

[LO6IX]

Quote: Originally Posted by eko718

^^^Durant's decrease likely has much to do with his injury last year.

Durant's only real decline was in minutes played . That's it. His efficiency and production were typical for him if you factor his minutes. He showed his improved playmaking too. The only decline attribute-wise should be durability.