NBA 2K16 Screenshots - Steph Curry, James Harden & Anthony Davis

[The 24th Letter]

Just want to point out....with all due respect to MikeGSW, what me and him are saying are completely different, lol

Im pretty much on board with the gist of HowDareI's post TBH, I was commenting on how much that same message needs to essentially be copied and pasted. All good though...i'll move on.

Re: Stephs hair....didn't 23 post that the reason his hair is like that is because of how it was when he was scanned, and that Ronnie said it would be updated? Seem's like a lot of folks missed that post.

[MikeGSW]

" I was commenting on how much that same message needs to essentially be copied and pasted. All good though...i'll move on."

That's all I'm saying. Posting the same thing over and over isn't a discussion. It's just repeating yourself. Steph's hair could be better, we get it. We don't need to read about it for 40 pages.

As I said. People are thirsty for info. I get it. But people need to just relax and learn to enjoy this. It's only a game. One guys hair isn't going to stop you from playing it and it sure as hell doesn't require a 40 page discussion.

I'm not even opening this thread again. What a waste of time this has been hahaha. Hopefully we get some more interesting 2k news today.

Enjoy your weekend everyone. Try not to lose any sleep over Steph's hair.

[ForeverVersatile]

Quote: Originally Posted by MikeGSW

People have been discussing Curry's hair for 30+ pages. It must be this whole "modern man" and "metrosexual" movement like Glee and Jersey Shore and the other stuff I don't get. It's his hair. How often are you going to look at that in the game? It seems a little off yeah and if they were to scan his head again or edit it then great. If not whatever. As a basketball fan I'm more concerned about his jump shot. **** his hair. Shave him for all I care, can he ball?

That's your opinion dubby, visuals come first for me. I guess your eyes are going to be closed or you're going to be playing on a super zoomed out camera. It's all about the immersion and If gameplay is off you speak on it right?

Steph isn't even my favorite player, but if he's a cover guy it should be corrected. Everything about that hair just looks screwed up.

The keyword is "video"game, so without visuals it's nothing.


Edit* I just saw the ig video and it looks way better than the screenshot. Forgot what whatever I said.

[J_Posse]

Quote: Originally Posted by ojandpizza

The lighting in 2k14 was great and vibrant, but not that realistic. No court has that much shine sitting live at a real basketball game, and players don't look like they have shiny wax smeared on them when they sweat. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed OJ, my main gripe with both titles is that every arena is lit like Madison Square Garden and Staples Center. The crowd lighting has took a huge step back since jumping to next (current) gen. I would like 2K to focus on individual arena lighting, but overall I like the (dulled) lighting on the court.

from Spurs Nation/Bills Backer HQ

[J_Posse]

Quote: Originally Posted by Bexthelegend

What are you talking about? It has nothing to do with preference. 2k is attempting to realistically replicate the nba in a video game. The lighting in 2k14 is closer to the lighting in a real nba game. It has nothing to do with preference. There is a right answer, you go with whatever lighting gets you closest to an accurate representation of an nba arena

Thing is neither example (2K14 or 2K15) is completely accurate to how a NBA arena is lit. Most NBA arena courts aren't as reflective as ice (2K14), while other than MSG and Staples Center the crowd, banners and arena details are visible passed the 5th or 6th row of seat (2K14 & 2K15).

from Spurs Nation/Bills Backer HQ

[IGhostUlt]

Quote: Originally Posted by J_Posse

Thing is neither example (2K14 or 2K15) is completely accurate to how a NBA arena is lit. Most NBA arena courts aren't as reflective as ice (2K14), while other than MSG and Staples Center the crowd, banners and arena details are visible passed the 5th or 6th row of seat (2K14 & 2K15). from Spurs Nation/Bills Backer HQ

Although not as much as 2k14, the reflections in the stadiums are very visible. It just depends on the color and brightness of the led lights in the stadium. Look at these videos for example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uRN7iJ5CqQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROB-7MC4qvE

[J_Posse]

Quote: Originally Posted by IGhostUlt

Although not as much as 2k14, the reflections in the stadiums are very visible. It just depends on the color and brightness of the led lights in the stadium. Look at these videos for example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uRN7iJ5CqQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROB-7MC4qvE

Good post, buddy. It is something they need to improve overall, apparently.

from Spurs Nation/Bills Backer HQ

[Sundown]

Quote: Originally Posted by MikeGSW

LMAO... I was leaving this but since you insist on dragging me back into it. 1. How does he not resemble himself? He looks awesome his face is staggeringly realistic it's insane how on point he looks.

He looks great. He could use a few tiny tweaks. I was addressing you stating that you don't actually care how accurate he looks and that he could be bald for all you cared. I happen to be slightly more demanding. I'm not a big fan of folks dictating how much others' should post based on how little they personally care about a topic, even if it's a regular or a mod that does it.

Quote:

2. His hair looks exactly like it did when they scanned his head, go see the old vine of him being scanned. If he didn't brush it out that's on him.

If his hair was longer when he was scanned, I'm fine with it.

Quote:

3. You hardly see players that close during the game.

That's a somewhat weak argument. Highlights happen all the time. If they're going to put effort into, then do it right. I'm not saying 2K isn't doing a great job-- they are-- but I think the critiques might be more in line with what 2K IS actually trying to accomplish than complaints about critiques and stating one doesn't care about accuracy.

Quote:

4. I'm more concerned with them getting Steph's jump shot and dribble animation right. But hey, keep salivating over his hair. I'll stick to basketball. Agree to disagree and move on. Each to their own.

Posting what's coming on 10+ posts on your disagreement with others disagreeing is kind of an odd way to go about agreeing to disagree isn't it?

Quote:

5. It doesn't require a 40 page discussion to say "his hair could be better". It's a one page discussion at most, then another 9 pages for lighting. People are being nit picky as ****. Appreciate what you've got because overall he looks incredibly realistic. That's not up for debate.

It doesn't require double digit posts cluttering a thread you already feel is too long to say that you think folks should be less nitpicky. 2 at most. See how that works?

Maybe a lot of posters wanted to express their thoughts in a couple of posts? Maybe that interest from a number of posters resulted in 40 pages? You do realize that your own posts repetitively shouting them down may added 3-4 unnecessary pages, right?

If you want to talk about something else, then go start a thread and talk about something else. I for one can't figure out what's supposed to be accomplished by complaining about critiques and observations about graphics in a thread about graphics.