MLB 14 The Show Screenshots (PS4)

[Madden's Jowels]

Quote: Originally Posted by cubby blue

I've got a question for one of the devs. I use timing hitting. I think I read somewhere that the ps4 controller buttons are no longer pressure sensitive. My question is when using timing hitting how do you check swing a pitch? I loved that about 13.

I'm pretty sure check swinging was not about pressure, it was about the duration you held the button. If you hit the button to swing and then immediately realize it's going to be a ball and release the button, you check your swing.

[cubby blue]

Quote: Originally Posted by Madden's Jowels

I'm pretty sure check swinging was not about pressure, it was about the duration you held the button. If you hit the button to swing and then immediately realize it's going to be a ball and release the button, you check your swing.

I hope you are right. Before I had a ps3, I had to play mlb 2k. It was really hard to check swing. I think you had to press the button twice to do it. I was never able to do it.

Anyway, I can't wait to get the show on the ps4!!!!

[RandyBass]

Boy we could really use some new screenshots, or preferably a video, if only to get a new thread going.

[MrOldboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Woodweaver

I was responding to your post, not Ryan's. But to respond to your new post, yes the animation rig/skeleton is the same. So in that sense, yes, they are the same as the PS3...proportional to a human body. We decided against the tails! :-)

Does that mean that the PS4-only animations aren't limited by the tech (i.e. Japanese & slap batting styles)? Just work that was done only on the PS4 version.

[tnixen]

Must be a really hot day in LA with all that sweat on his hat

[Knight165]

Quote: Originally Posted by Woodweaver

They are not the same player models. Take a look at the comparisons shots posted earlier in the thread...pretty obvious.

Thank you Woodweaver, for confirming what most of us know to be true.
Perhaps this will stop the broken record cries of some.
(and before panties start getting in a bunch....this post is NOT about whether or not the graphics/models/art/ANYTHING can't be improved upon....but about the fact that they were not "ported over" from the PS3....or "the same" as the PS3)

M.K.
Knight165

[Woodweaver]

Quote: Originally Posted by MrOldboy

Does that mean that the PS4-only animations aren't limited by the tech (i.e. Japanese & slap batting styles)? Just work that was done only on the PS4 version.

If I understand your question correctly, you're wondering if the new PS4-only animations could have been used in the PS3 version of the game.

The answer is yes, but there is essentially no more room.

[Moegames]

Quote: Originally Posted by CMH

Consider it a pledge of quality development when posters are beginning to look at things like that. Why is it wrong to complain about the dirt if the poster feels it can look better? Didn't someone once complain about the grass? Look at it now. If the grass didn't matter to the gameplay , why would the developers spend time improving it? Likely to make a better looking overall game. So why not dirt? You can call the complaint ridiculous or you can actually admire the fact that dirt is the biggest issue a poster has in a game that has very little else to complain over. But attacking the person for it? His complaints are legitimate and isn't the mantra "we should continue to push developers" something gamers abide by? So again, explain to me why not dirt? Why not the Jays blue? Why not facial detail? Why not franchise mode? Why not whatever someone will eventually complain about because that's all they can point to when everything else looks so good? Sent from my mobile device.

Agreed but there is a way to complain and a way not to complain. I think that some people just don't know how "important" it is to be polite and respectuful rather than rude and arrogant when pointing out something that should be fixed or adjusted.

Its sorta like how some women moan and whine (even men) ...it never helps when they come with that kind of garbage with a snotty attitude...but when they come with respect and humility which a lot of people like these days lack > (humility) it makes a word of difference in listening and putting effort in improving. Do we honestly think most developers want to listen to criticism that is harsh, mean and disrespectful? Or "constructive criticism" that comes from a humbled person?