Is strike zone off the way to go?

[ThaShark28_316]

I want to know...trying to find better ways to pitch...can anyone who uses this method of play give me some ideas? thanks.

[josereyes4mvp7]

strike zone off ball marker off pitcher view...if u like realism this is the way to go

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by josereyes4mvp7

strike zone off ball marker off pitcher view...if u like realism this is the way to go

You forgot no vibration!

[fullmetal2405]

Ooo never thought of no vibration. But I go strike zone off, ball marker off, pitcher view. with the marker and the strike zone and everything... It's just too easy to throw strikes. You need some walks in there. In older games before you could turn these off (or before I thought to) I'd go an entire game with 64 pitches, 3 of them balls. It's the only way to go, IMO, but that's just that. An opinion. This is a preference thing. If you like to get through games quickly and will sacrifice realism, then go with it and get with the strike throwin'

[chuckm1961]

However, if you keep pounding the strike zone, you will be one of the people who posts later wondering whether the game has a "comeback" code ... since the CPU will eventually figure you out, and start pounding your pitches!

[jim416]

Exactly. You can't play this game just throwing in the zone, nipping the corners. This game actually requires you throw balls out of the K zone, on purpose, in situations and set the batters up.

I read a post where a gamer said that the CPU will NOT swing at balls out of the zone. Absolutely not so. This game requires some time to play it right.

[bobeureally27]

Quote: Originally Posted by josereyes4mvp7

strike zone off ball marker off pitcher view...if u like realism this is the way to go

This plus no vibration is the only way to go.

[Ljm623]

Yep classic pitching with everything off is the most realistic way to go imho