Which RB is better?

[ostone]

RB A

Spoiler

Pablo parker

20 years old 93 spd, 87 str, 97 agi, 92 acc, 82 trk, 91 sta,78 spm, 86 jkm, 88 ctch and cit with 86 spc

OR

RB B

Spoiler

Keith Taimani

22 years old 91 spd, 92 str, 96 agi, 94 acc, 86 trk, 87 sta, 90 spm, 95 jkm, 76 cth and 82 cit with 78 spc

Have Rb A on roster, thinking of getting B.

Thoughts?

[ruttentud]

Well, those are pretty close. It really depends on how you use them. I'd probably go with A because he has the higher speed, which is the most expensive to upgrade and he's 2 years younger.

These are some super crazy rated RBs too. Holy cow. Those are like mini Lynchs. 87 and 92 STR!

[friscob]

I'd definitely prefer RB b. Better attributes, better acceleration, and just a touch slower. Speed isn't everything and he'd be a monster once you get him the fight for yards trait.

[MisterCoates]

For me RB B as well, for all the reasons friscob said hah, i'd lose a couple points of speed for that strength and acc.. brutal

[ggsimmonds]

Definitely B.

for RBs, acc is far more important than speed.

Also, 92 str and 96 agi? holy crap was he genetically engineered?

[Herbn]

I'd have to go B too. That guy looks like a freak of nature. What draft class is he in?

[ostone]

He's in the Lenzelle drake/gutierrez/connor phillip draft.

And I was thinking B as well, But A has wr like catching attributes. Does this not factor in the decision very much?

[Herbn]

Thanks, I'll have to keep an eye out for that class.

The catching stats for B are perfectly fine. They are more than high enough for him to reliably catch passes out of the backfield. Also, keep in mind that those attributes are easy to develop because they're cheap. Something like strength is incredibly expensive.

I have David Wilson and Eddie Lacy as my RBs, and their catching stats are much lower. However, they rarely ever drop passes, and when they do, it's usually because I made a bad throw.

It's always nice to have a RB that has great hands, but their main job is to run the ball.