Madden NFL 13 Team Ratings from E3 Build

[sheaday30]

Quote: Originally Posted by CatMan72

Panthers = 76 while the Redskins = 78? LOL, good old fashioned NFC East bias is alive and well in Madden 13.

Yea Panthers are hands down better than the Skins (they beat them) and Jets.

[sheaday30]

Quote: Originally Posted by Madwolf

Based on what? Newton being awesome and the defense being terrible? I'm a Panthers fan, and the rating we have in the new system is more than fair.

Not fair being worse than the Skins and the D isn't horrible. If you were indeed a Panthers fan you would know that we were starting 3rd stringers in every position except the DB's (who actually do suck besides Gamble).

I would give the Panthers an honest 79-81 range

[sheaday30]

Quote: Originally Posted by LiL_MiK3Y

How the blue hell are Raiders only a 70 ? We went 500. Below 500. teams are higher ? Someone explain to me how that works .

It depends on the teams you play obviously. Anybody can play scrubs and get a better record than a team that plays elite teams... Common sense

[themassacre771.1]

Lets not forget how injured that Panthers team was last year.

[mizzou852]

Im gonna say the actually ratings at release will be higher for every team. You cant tell me not one team will be 90 and expect me to believe that.

[chronoxiong]

These ratings are lower than the team ratings in NCAA Football 13. What the hell? Lol...I don't get it. The 49ers should be higher than 81 by the way. Should be near mid 80's just like the Patriots and Steelers.

[Aftershock9958]

Maybe this has been pointed out. Has anyone taken into account that there are a couple of new ratings that might be worked into the equation now?

Also that this could mean that there's more of a gap in overalls than there has been in the past (which I think a lot of people were hoping for).

I feel as though the high experience costs may be a sign of that. It would be unreasonable for the 90's attributes to cost so much experience if the stock rosters had too many players with ratings in the 90's - the draft class players would never reach those levels, so the players from the 2012 season at their peak would always be better than the future players. Speculation of course.

[balcobomber25]

Quote: Originally Posted by sheaday30

Not fair being worse than the Skins and the D isn't horrible. If you were indeed a Panthers fan you would know that we were starting 3rd stringers in every position except the DB's (who actually do suck besides Gamble). I would give the Panthers an honest 79-81 range

As a fan you would give them that grade which is expected because you have a biased opinion we all do when it comes to our teams. As a Patriots fan I have no biased against or for the Panthers, I can look at it objectively and see they are a team in transition, they have a lot of young talent but they are still a few years away from being a contender. I would say a rating in the 70-75 range is more than generous.