Donny Moore, the 'Madden Ratings Czar', Leaving EA

[khaliib]

Quote: Originally Posted by StefJoeHalt

Kane I have a question..if using PFF as a major source are u likely to move more towards there scale..cause as of right now, Madden still weighs a lot higher..see below Sent from my broken iPhone using my data I can't afford

The game already uses this format in CFM (under the hood) to represent team/league value.
(**is not the seen OVR)

90-99 = Icon (i.e. Team Cornerstones)
82-89 = Award Winner (i.e. Pro Bowler)
76-81 = Captain
70-75 = Marquee
60-69 = Regular
59 & under

[StefJoeHalt]

Quote: Originally Posted by khaliib

The game already uses this format in CFM (under the hood) to represent team/league value. (**is not the seen OVR) 90-99 = Icon (i.e. Team Cornerstones) 82-89 = Award Winner (i.e. Pro Bowler) 76-81 = Captain 70-75 = Marquee 60-69 = Regular 59 & under

Ok...but wouldn't it be better if there was a scale or this scale used for players true value..similar to what u see with FBG ratings


Sent from my broken iPhone using my data I can't afford

[khaliib]

Quote: Originally Posted by StefJoeHalt

Ok...but wouldn't it be better if there was a scale or this scale used for players true value..similar to what u see with FBG ratings Sent from my broken iPhone using my data I can't afford

My answer is that "Ratings" function in various roles within the overall scope of the game, beyond just a "player value" system.

What doesn't get discussed when talking about what mechanism/model should be used, is the "functionality" implication of a rating/model change upon years of coding, especially since Madden is not being rebuilt from the ground up. (per say)

A changed ratings model has implications upon these aspects of coding.
1) Player Contracts

2) Depth Charts

3) Animations
- triggering levels
- ability to expand/add hundreds or more upon a "particular" rating, there by, limiting the ability to make an aspect of gameplay more fluid

4) Die Roll/Win Loss

5) Coach's/Staff. (they're part of the current model used)
- they impact player ratings

6) Subjective Areas
- Stamina
- Injury

Again, ratings go beyond the scope of just "player value" and have a multitude of implications upon the "functionality" of Madden as a whole.

To be honest, if Madden was built to a 100% replication of the NFL, most wouldn't enjoy themselves while playing, because our perspectives of the sport vary for a plethora of reasons, an element of "fantasy" must be present in Madden to capture such a broad stroke of perspectives.

That's the beauty of video games!!!

[SECElit3]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

Ah yes, the same PFF who declared Brad Jones as a budding star right before GB cut him. https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...ar-brad-jones/ If I may ask, where did you learn to break down game film? Did you coach or serve as a GA somewhere? Just asking because I first learned from Mike O'Connell (http://www.wifca.org/news_article/sh...rrer_id=480362) while coaching at EC-Regis about a decade ago before being formally taught by David Te' Thomas (http://bleacherreport.com/users/153363-dave-te-thomas) while serving as a midwest regional scout at NFLDS from 2005-2009. It just goes to show you that everyone gets a start somewhere and I wanted to know where you got yours.

Did you actually expect a response Dan? Again, uniform guys should stick with uniforms. Kane does a fair job at them. Ratings should be handled by someone who only has that responsibility.

The process in it's current state is destined for failure, as indicated by some of the late season ratings.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[SECElit3]

90-100 should be Hall of Famer territory. And as stated, by an earlier poster, Dallas is extremely overrated.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by SECElit3

Did you actually expect a response Dan?

This is not at all fair.

The question was asked at 3 pm on friggin Christmas.

I'm all for fair criticism but lets not say something like this when the guy hasn't even been given a fair chance to respond.

[SECElit3]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

This is not at all fair. The question was asked at 3 pm on friggin Christmas. I'm all for fair criticism but lets not say something like this when the guy hasn't even been given a fair chance to respond.

Agreed... We will await the response


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[roadman]

I thought it was Christmas time when one spreads good cheer and good will all around.

Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if people aren't working during the holidays and enjoying time off with their families.