Slider tweaking NCAA Michigan State 2013 season

[Eiskrap]

Michigan State Spartans at Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Sep 30, 2013	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Michigan State Spartans (3-0)					28
#14 Notre Dame Fighting Irish (2-1)					51

Team Stats Comparison
	MSU	ND
Total Offense	319	600
Rushing Yards	91	238
Passing Yards	228	362
First Downs	13	26
Punt Return Yards
Kick Return Yards
Total Yards
Turnovers	2	0
3rd Down Converstion	4-12	8-16
4th Down Conversion	0-0	1-2
2-Point Conversion	0-0	0-0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals
Penalties	4-33	1-8
Posession Time	18:58	21:02

Michigan State Spartans PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Maxwell 24/40 228 2 1 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Hill 16 60 3.7 1 Williams 4 20 5.0 0 Maxwell 2 11 5.5 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Burbridge 8 62 7.7 0 Mumphrey 4 48 12 0 Lippett 4 69 17.2 1

Notre Dame Fighting Irish PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Rees 31/40 362 3 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Atkinson III 23 175 7.6 1 Rees 17 43 2.5 2 Carlisle 5 16 3.2 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Brown 9 107 11.8 1 Welch 8 65 8.1 0 Atkinson III 4 79 19.7 0

Passing
CPU were able to move the ball through the air in big chunks. Lots of open receivers, however some of the time there was good coverage. We got two sacks on Rees, both of which looked pretty good. Rees was on the money all of the time, with the only incompletions due to throwaways or broken up passes. Lots of 20 yard completions but not many deep attempts.

We struggled in the pass game with ND dominating the line, leading to quite a few broken plays (no sacks). Curl and crossing routes generally open. Couple of errant throws from Maxwell, didn't look realistic but happy to have.

On both sides of the ball streaks were well defended, and defenders more aggressive then receivers. Not sure how to fix this.

Not many drops on either side, only when contact came just after making the catch.

Suggestions:
Raise user Pass Block 5
Raise User/CPU Pass coverage by 5
Lower CPU accuracy by 5

Rushing

ND were able to run the ball effectively often getting 8-10 yards. Seemed like the blockers were able to get to the linebackers every play. No spin moves or jukes from any ND ball carriers.

We struggled to run the ball. ND dominated the line and we couldn't get the edge. 30 yards of our rushing came on one TD run. One fumble by Maxwell.

Suggestions:
Lower CPU run blocking by 5
Raise CPU run ability by 5

Kicking Game
Seemed fine, ND got it deep into the end zone or a touchback on most kicks. We were able to run one back for a TD for 106yds with one wicked block.

Suggestions:
Lower CPU Kickoff power by 5

General

Field feels to small and not enough big plays. No separation on streak routes

[Eiskrap]

Michigan State Spartans at Iowa Hawkeyes
Oct 2, 2013	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Michigan State Spartans (3-1)	14	17	0	7	38
Iowa Hawkeyes (3-2)	7	10	0	7	24

Team Stats Comparison
	MSU	IOWA
Total Offense	327	305
Rushing Yards	161	50
Passing Yards	166	255
First Downs	22	14
Punt Return Yards	32	25
Kick Return Yards	142	128
Total Yards	501	458
Turnovers	0	1
3rd Down Converstion	4-9	6-14
4th Down Conversion	0-0	2-4
2-Point Conversion	0-0	0-0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals	5-5-0	2-1-1
Penalties	1-4	0-0
Posession Time	24:28	15:32

Michigan State Spartans PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Maxwell 20/25 166 3 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Hill 23 102 4.4 2 Williams 13 74 5.6 0 Maxwell 5 -21 -4.2 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Hill 5 24 4.8 2 Lippett 4 27 6.7 0 Mumphrey 4 43 10.7 0 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD Team 4 1 0

Iowa Hawkeyes PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Rudock 20/35 255 2 1 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Weisman 20 80 4.0 1 Rudock 6 -31 -5.1 0 Plewa 2 1 0.5 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Smith 5 72 14.4 1 Fiedorowicz 5 59 11.8 1 Cotton 3 45 15.0 0 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD Team 2 0 0

Passing
Maxwell had a good game, was efficient and receivers were quite open. Got sacked twice and pressured another 3/4 times. Not enough time in the pocket for plays to develop, and so usually end up in dump offs.

CPU had a few off target throws and suffered quite a few drops, although a lot of these were forced. 4 sacks but they were all genuine, no rushes into DE.

For both CPU and User the main pass catchers are tight ends and running backs. Screens, crossing routes and curls are the best way to generate yards 10-15 at a time. Not enough plays open for WR due to lack of separation. Might try playing with pass interference sliders to see if we can generate anything here.

Suggestions:
Raise user/cpu pass coverage by 5
Raise user pass blocking by 5
Reduce threshold by 5

Running

We had a good game on the ground, generating yards in the first half. Second half was tougher but we came through with a tough drive in the 4th to seal the win.

CPU ran efficiently but didn't break any big gains off.

Suggestions:
Raise CPU rush defense by 5

Kicking

Should have run another kick back on opening kick off, seem to be knocking a lot of defenders to the ground on returns.

Suggestions:
None

Changes:
Raise user/cpu pass coverage by 10
Raise user pass blocking by 5
Reduce threshold by 0
Raise CPU run ability 5
Raise CPU rush defense by 5

[Eiskrap]

Indiana Hoosiers at Michigan State Spartans
Oct 5, 2013	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Indiana Hoosiers (3-2)	3	3	0	0	6
Michigan State Spartans (4-1)	3	0	14	0	17

Team Stats Comparison
	IND	MSU
Total Offense	288	350
Rushing Yards	177	223
Passing Yards	111	127
First Downs	18	23
Punt Return Yards	6	21
Kick Return Yards	52	55
Total Yards	346	426
Turnovers	1	2
3rd Down Converstion	3-12	5-13
4th Down Conversion	0-2	1-2
2-Point Conversion	0-0	0-0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals	3-0-2	4-2-1
Penalties	4-49	2-19
Posession Time	14:49	25:11

Indiana Hoosiers PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Roberson 10/21 111 0 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Roberson 21 52 2.4 0 Coleman 15 108 7.2 0 Roberts 4 3.4 3.4 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Hughes 4 62 15.5 0 Wynn 2 23 11.5 0 Latimer 1 11 11.0 0 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD Team 2 2 0

Michigan State Spartans PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Maxwell 17/29 127 1 2 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Hill 26 181 6.9 1 Williams 12 71 5.9 0 Maxwell 6 -33 -5.5 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Hill 4 13 3.2 0 Mumphrey 4 36 9.0 0 Burbridge 3 53 17.6 1 DEFENSE TACK SACK INT TD Team 10 0 0

Changes
Reduce user run ability 5
Reduce user run blocking 5
Increase Rush defence 5
Increase tackling 5
Reduce run ability 5
Reduce run blocking 5
Increase Rush defence 5
Increase tackling 5
Increase defensive pass interference by 50

[Eiskrap]

3rd and 2...