More Links

Jenkins · 09-01-2010, 01:24 AM

Has the progression problem been fixed in dynasty? Are there a lot less amounts of throwaway type players now? I've been wanting to get this game but the progression problem is a huge turnoff.

Adamantium · 09-01-2010, 01:44 AM

Yeah it's been fixed since the beginning of August, when all the teams' grades slowly withered away until you were left with 50+ teams at or below a D+ overall.

It's still difficult to build a loaded team very fast, but that's probably a good thing. After a few years, you'll only see a select few teams above an A- overall.

I'm not sure, but it seems like progression is tied either to Coach Experience, Coach Prestige, or Athletic Facilities. I say this because I'm in an offline dynasty with my roommate. I'm Stanford and he is Cal, and in the first offseason, my team had the standard progression of about 3-3.5 OVR points per player, but his averaged more like 4-5 OVR points per player. We're both 3 Star programs, but his recruiting grades were considerably higher in all three categories above, which leads me to believe that one of those is responsible.

Jenkins · 09-01-2010, 01:57 AM

Are there still a lot of upsets? By upsets I mean FCS directional teams taking out FBS teams.

Adamantium · 09-01-2010, 12:56 PM

I've never seen it happen. Maybe if it's FCS vs. Eastern Michigan or something, but I've never seen it.

jello1717 · 09-01-2010, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenkins


	Are there still a lot of upsets? By upsets I mean FCS directional teams taking out FBS teams.

Those weren't upsets. FCS teams are D- teams. Before they fixed the progression, there were tons of D- FBS schools so it was a D- team beating a D- team which isn't an upset.

I haven't noticed FCS schools beating FBS schools any more, but I haven't looked hard.

jbrew2411 · 09-01-2010, 09:23 PM

I like what EA has done with the progression now. At first I had huge issues with all the "throw away" players as they are called. I'm now in year 3 with Notre Dame and have a 3* Juco SoRs QB starting. He came in at 79 overall and after a red shirt year he's now a 82ovr. That same player would have been a 68ovr before the fix. I have seen some good 3* players and have a few starting for me. It is much harder to build a stud team in one class. I'm really having fun with this game now. I have played this game since 98 and never had this much fun. Just wish I had more time to play but have a full plate and very little time.

Buckeyes_Doc · 09-02-2010, 09:43 AM

Has this really been fixed? I just started year 4 of my Indiana dynasty and I only see 3 or 4 A- teams. My Indiana team started out as a B- and is now a C. This isn't my ideal way of running a dynasty where my team is declining every year, even though I'm pulling in decent recruiting classes.

My kickers and punters both progessed 10 points but everyone else progressed from 1 point to 4 points.

09-01-2010, 01:24 AM	#1
Jenkins Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Jan 2010	Progression Has the progression problem been fixed in dynasty? Are there a lot less amounts of throwaway type players now? I've been wanting to get this game but the progression problem is a huge turnoff.

09-01-2010, 01:44 AM	#2
Adamantium Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Jul 2010	Re: Progression Yeah it's been fixed since the beginning of August, when all the teams' grades slowly withered away until you were left with 50+ teams at or below a D+ overall. It's still difficult to build a loaded team very fast, but that's probably a good thing. After a few years, you'll only see a select few teams above an A- overall. I'm not sure, but it seems like progression is tied either to Coach Experience, Coach Prestige, or Athletic Facilities. I say this because I'm in an offline dynasty with my roommate. I'm Stanford and he is Cal, and in the first offseason, my team had the standard progression of about 3-3.5 OVR points per player, but his averaged more like 4-5 OVR points per player. We're both 3 Star programs, but his recruiting grades were considerably higher in all three categories above, which leads me to believe that one of those is responsible.

09-01-2010, 01:57 AM	#3
Jenkins Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Jan 2010	Re: Progression Are there still a lot of upsets? By upsets I mean FCS directional teams taking out FBS teams.

09-01-2010, 12:56 PM	#4
Adamantium Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Jul 2010	Re: Progression I've never seen it happen. Maybe if it's FCS vs. Eastern Michigan or something, but I've never seen it.

09-01-2010, 09:23 PM	#6
jbrew2411 MVP OVR: 13 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: In a van down by the river!!!	Re: Progression I like what EA has done with the progression now. At first I had huge issues with all the "throw away" players as they are called. I'm now in year 3 with Notre Dame and have a 3* Juco SoRs QB starting. He came in at 79 overall and after a red shirt year he's now a 82ovr. That same player would have been a 68ovr before the fix. I have seen some good 3* players and have a few starting for me. It is much harder to build a stud team in one class. I'm really having fun with this game now. I have played this game since 98 and never had this much fun. Just wish I had more time to play but have a full plate and very little time.

	A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
	NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
	College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own

09-02-2010, 09:43 AM	#7
Buckeyes_Doc In Dalton I Trust OVR: 32 Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Chicago Posts: 11,927	Re: Progression Has this really been fixed? I just started year 4 of my Indiana dynasty and I only see 3 or 4 A- teams. My Indiana team started out as a B- and is now a C. This isn't my ideal way of running a dynasty where my team is declining every year, even though I'm pulling in decent recruiting classes. My kickers and punters both progessed 10 points but everyone else progressed from 1 point to 4 points. __________________ Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

More Links

Progression