Home
Feature Article
Five Toughest NCAA Football 09 Dynasty Jobs

Each year, NCAA players try to pull off the impossible by bringing teams like North Texas and Eastern Michigan to the promised land after just a couple of seasons. Every NCAA gamer contemplates what the toughest jobs in college football are, and I am no different.

If you are looking for a tough challenge this year with the NCAA Football 09 Dynasty Mode, I want you to check out my list of challenging schools and then give me some feedback on which schools you think would be toughest to take over. So without further adieu, here are the top 5 toughest schools to actually turn into a powerhouse.

5. North Texas (Sun Belt)

Right off the bat, I am sure many of you are crying foul since North Texas has not only won its conference in recent memory, but the team also dominated Sun Belt play for a few years earlier this decade. How quickly things change in the Sun Belt. North Texas is now one of the worst teams in the worst Football Bowl Subdivision conference (for the uncool kids, this is the NCAA's new way of saying division I-A), and things do not look to be getting any easier.

Coming off of a 2-10 season, the Mean Green has to replace tons of starters while fielding a very young team. The out-of-conference slate includes Kansas State, Tulsa, LSU and Rice, all of which could very well be losses. The biggest positive about this team it its youth. You will be able to build for the future with sophomore quarterback Giovanni Vizza.

Some might consider recruiting to be an easy task since North Texas is located in the high school football capital of the world. However, when you are the worst team in the state of Texas, the best recruits are long gone before you get to them. Considering the youth, the tough schedule, and the tough recruiting challenges you will be faced with, expect North Texas to take a few years to make a comeback.

4. Utah State (WAC)

What do you get when you lose a bunch of key players off a really bad team in a really bad football state? You get a long and brutal road ahead for anyone who decides to take over the reigns at Utah State. Right now, the most experienced player on the Utah State offense is tight end Rob Myers and center Ryan Tonnemacher. Neither guy is going to have a very high rating in the final version of NCAA Football 09. In the end, expect a tough job ahead while rebuilding the Aggies.

"It does not help that the WAC is not an easy conference by any stretch of the imagination. Prepare yourself for frustration."


The first big concern you will have to deal with is the fact that you are going to have to try to surpass Hawaii, Boise State and Fresno State to achieve dominance. Climbing the mountain will not be easy considering the fact that Utah State has not won a conference crown in over 11 years. The recruiting trail should be rather tough as well since there is not that much in-state talent, and what little there is will go to cross-state rival Utah or BYU.

In all reality, getting Utah State above Boise, Fresno, Utah or Hawaii is going to be very tough. It does not help that the WAC is not an easy conference by any stretch of the imagination. Prepare yourself for frustration.

3. Syracuse (Big East)

The Orange not only sport some incredibly ugly uniforms, they also sport a program which is in dire straights right now. Right now the Orange are stuck in a position that has them looking way up at the current class of the Big East. Passing West Virginia, South Florida, Pitt and Rutgers in the Big East is going to be near impossible within a couple of years.

The good news is head coach Greg Robinson brought in a decent recruiting class, which features some skilled talent as well as some decent defenders. However, returning to the bad news, you are going to have to deal with the inevitable increased expectations of a program which has won in the past. The expectations to perform will be fairly high as the virtual Syracuse fans will be looking to relive the days of Donovan McNabb at the helm.

Your biggest plus will be being the biggest program in a very populous state, but your road to success will not be easy. Expect to lose for a year or two before starting to see a turnaround. But with the added expectations of a more prestigious school, you better have a great third year to stick around as the coach of the Orange in year four.

2. Idaho (WAC)

Idaho is a program that could be defined as the pit of college football coaching careers. The Vandals play in the smallest FBS stadium (Kibbie Dome at 16,000); they also call a bad football state home; and above all other things, it has been a decade since anyone has won a conference title at Idaho -- the team has won just 16 games since 2001. The Vandals last winning season? All the way back in 1999, when Idaho finished 7-4, which was nine years ago and five coaches ago. Yikes!

 

"So what do you have to work with at Idaho? The answer is, nothing really."


Also, do not expect to be stopping too many opponents in year one, as the Vandals return just four starters to a defense which ranked 110 in scoring defense last year. The offense is returning experience, but the offense was just bad last year, averaging just 349 yards a game.

So what do you have to work with at Idaho? The answer is, nothing really. You will have to spend a ton of recruiting points to find any decent talent outside of Idaho, and you may not have many points to spare. You are also going to be recruiting against in-state heavyweight Boise State. You are going to be challenged early and often at Idaho and you are not going to have an easy road to meeting expectations.

A bowl appearance by year three will be your first challenge, while a conference crown a year or so later would be your next.

Before I list number one, let me just post a few teams that didn't quite make the cut, but are still on a short list of hard teams to make into a powerhouse: Baylor, Vanderbuilt, UNLV, San Jose St, Rice, SMU, Eastern Michigan, Florida International.

1. Duke (ACC)

And the toughest job of them all? That would be coaching Duke, a team which has not won a conference title in nearly two decades and has not had a winning season since the early 1990s. The program had its best years during the 1930s -- the best year was 1938. Any future coach of the Blue Devils will also be looking way up at the rest of the ACC, which will result in a huge gap between your team and the top teams in the ACC.

Your first task as coach of the Blue Devils will be to try to wrestle wins away from Northwestern and an Football Championship Subdivision (again, the NCAA's new cute way of saying Division 1-AA) team. Starting off 2-0 would do your program wonders, although they may be your only wins in year one. The talent gap between Duke and the rest of the ACC is enormous, which might explain why no coach sans Steve Spurrier has won there in recent memory.

The recruiting trail will be very difficult as well, with you having to compete in the Carolinas against several quality football programs as well as southern heavyweights Georgia and Florida. The problem with recruiting at Duke is you are not going to be able to catch the better talent from your region since the heavyweights will be taking the best talent first. Thus, your rebuilding process will take some time.

Your boosters will expect you to win just as quickly as an Idaho or a Utah State since the talent is just a bit higher than those schools, with the added caveat of being in a major BCS conference. The lack of talent means your success early and often will be predicated by how you manage the talent gap between your Blue Devils and your ACC opponents. In the end, there is a reason no coach has succeeded in getting Duke near a bowl game in some time. For you to succeed and reach the top of the ACC, it is going to take some skillful recruiting and coaching.

This article is also featured on Bleacher Report. Bleacher Report is where the sports bar meets the press box, the place for fan-journalists to create and critique high-quality sports analysis. Visit Bleacher Report for more video games news.


NCAA Football 09 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 TheGamingChef @ 06/30/08 03:46 PM
I'm glad Iowa State isn't on this list... I'm sure they just missed the list of teams that didn't make the cut though
 
# 2 Village Idiot @ 06/30/08 03:47 PM
What an utter embarrassment that Syracuse is on this list. That cute little dome they play in used to be one of the tougher venues in the country. I even vividly remember them being the preseason #2 one year (McNabb days). There's no reason why they shouldn't be on par with programs like BC, Iowa or Michigan State - instead, they're on this list. Just wow.
 
# 3 xboxfever @ 06/30/08 03:53 PM
Iowa State has to much upside. ISU, Kansas State, and Baylor on paper are the three worst teams in the Big 12, but they are still better than 1/3 of the teams in the country with the exception being Baylor.
 
# 4 callmetaternuts @ 06/30/08 03:55 PM
Good article, and some other teams could easily be on that list.
 
# 5 RaychelSnr @ 06/30/08 04:06 PM
Thanks guys. Here are the other teams that just barely missed the cut.

Baylor, Vanderbilt, Iowa State, UNLV, San Jose St, Rice, SMU, Eastern Michigan, Florida International
 
# 6 Brandwin @ 06/30/08 04:09 PM
No Baylor? They have not been in a bowl game since 94 and their record over the last 8 years has been 37-101
 
# 7 auburntigersfan @ 06/30/08 04:14 PM
Maybe I will start a dynasty with Syracuse or Duke now.
 
# 8 auburntigersfan @ 06/30/08 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DookieMowf
No Baylor? They have not been in a bowl game since 94 and their record over the last 8 years has been 37-101
so, your essentially saying they your team is worse than they thought? lmao
 
# 9 RaychelSnr @ 06/30/08 04:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DookieMowf
No Baylor? They have not been in a bowl game since 94 and their record over the last 8 years has been 37-101
I don't think Baylor would be all that tough to turn around in Dynasty mode. Realistically, they play in the Big XII and could be one of the top 6 schools actively seeking talent in the state of Texas with just a solid 6-6 year. Out on the real recruiting trail it is tougher since Baylor is a private school with higher academic standards, but NCAA doesn't take those standards into account. I would say the mountain isn't quite as tall as it is at the other five schools on this list.
 
# 10 thudias @ 06/30/08 04:57 PM
Since I only play NCAA for around 30 days or until Madden is released I am going with UNLV. I usually pick back up with NCAA when I get sick of madden until March Madness/NCAA2k is released.
 
# 11 BoomerSooner11 @ 06/30/08 05:03 PM
Good article...Ya ISU and Baylor will lose like three games in a row all losing by like 7 points or less..shoot Baylor put OU in double OT about two yrs ago and OU also had a hell of a time with ISU last year.
 
# 12 Scott @ 06/30/08 05:07 PM
No Western Kentucky?
 
# 13 Solidice @ 06/30/08 05:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott
No Western Kentucky?
yup, they have a tougher schedle than last year.

@Indiana, @Kentucky, @Alabama, and @Virginia Tech will be tough for WKU this season.

they also play Eastern Kentucky which they should win, Ball state, and Murry state(which i know nothing about).

the rest of their games are against their future(2009-10 season) conference foes, North Texas, FAU, Troy, MTSU(WKU beat them last year 20-17), and FIU.
 
# 14 nikka @ 06/30/08 05:29 PM
I personally like to bring a 1-AA (FCS) team up to the independents replacing Army with school/teams that are on the brink of being a 1-A school.. like Montana, UMass, Delaware,
& Villanova... I always find it a much harder road to take
I normally schedule three 1-AA teams mainly the rivals of my school & schedule somewhat local games against some good programs I play the games on heisman don't normally win those in first couple of years & simulate against 1-AA teams (95% of the time it's a W) try to land a couple of top recruits during the regular season and build off of them.

I don't know if anyone else likes to do this but for me doing an Ole Miss dynasty gets old I can build them up in 1 year and it isn't very fun or much of a challenge either.
 
# 15 Computalover @ 06/30/08 05:30 PM
I always scan the 3 2 and even 1 star ranks to find that "diamond in the ruff player" for my maryland dynasty. i can usually secure 3 star players with 4 and 5 star once in a while @ maryland. but i have in games past found some players like a 1 star kid who had 99 speed 98 agility and 98 acceleration.. but bricks for hands.. and he was about 5'8.. 176 or something.. i put him in as the KR/PR and DB.. 4 years later this kid was all over the place! slapping balls.. still couldnt catch for crap.. but his cover skills and his jump wow!

I found many players like this and slowly built maryland up to the national championship in 2016, with some secondary bowls and a few BCS bowls along the way... also.. in your schedule, schedule powerhouse teams as often as possible, that helps with the prestige.. (you will suffer some thumpings early on) but playing USC is better than Temple if you want to woo some players!

oh.. temple is another team to add to the list lol!
 
# 16 Ruffy @ 06/30/08 05:50 PM
Not sure about #5 at all....

Sure its North Texas......but hell it's Texas and no one expects to grab a top recruit but you can accumalte and build more quality 3 star players than most other states....

Last Yr I'd agree Utah was pretty hard....

But I honestly stay away from states where football is a staple.

I used to enjoy bringing a 1-AA team.....say SE Missouri State for example and dragging them into either the Sunbelt for a pretty good challenge or replace a team in the Big 12 for a sickly challenge.

I'd think the indepndents have the worst time...other than ND as they have less chances to build points from winning their confernce etc.

Temple would have to be up there.
 
# 17 Jas8099 @ 06/30/08 06:02 PM
Nice! Go ORANGE! I was already planning on seeing what I could do with a 'Cuse dynasty, and now I'm absolutely determined to make the most of it.

Just need to determine how quickly to flood the lineup with freshmen. Do most of you drop your top recruits into the starting lineup right out of the gates or let them work as understudies for a year or 2 before taking over as starters?
 
# 18 vanderbiltfan87 @ 06/30/08 06:12 PM
i'm kind of surprised vandy didn't make the top 5. we haven't been to a bowl game since 1982. after that year we are a combined 76-200. lol. only 3 bowl appearances in school history and haven't won a conference title since 1923.

but i will go on the record and say this could be the year we make it to a bowl game. i feel optimistic for some odd reason.
 
# 19 RaychelSnr @ 06/30/08 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruffy
Not sure about #5 at all....

Sure its North Texas......but hell it's Texas and no one expects to grab a top recruit but you can accumalte and build more quality 3 star players than most other states....

Last Yr I'd agree Utah was pretty hard....

But I honestly stay away from states where football is a staple.

I used to enjoy bringing a 1-AA team.....say SE Missouri State for example and dragging them into either the Sunbelt for a pretty good challenge or replace a team in the Big 12 for a sickly challenge.

I'd think the indepndents have the worst time...other than ND as they have less chances to build points from winning their confernce etc.

Temple would have to be up there.
I agree with your point and it was something I thought about long and hard. There are tons of FBS schools in Texas and North Texas is at the bottom of the list. When you add to the fact Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Arkansas, and LSU have precedent, perhaps even New Mexico and Colorado...there just isn't that much recruiting talent left. I think North Texas is tough because you have to try to find diamonds in the rough in the state of Texas that no one else wants, and if a Texas or Oklahoma decides they want that player, that could very well mean (if the recruiting is spot on) that you have lost that player.
 
# 20 Steelerfan2k1 @ 06/30/08 07:16 PM
Oh man - where is Temple? They were the second worst rated team in the game in NCAA 08 (just ahead of Eastern Michigan). It took me years to make them a respectable team.

I loved playing as them though, and I now follow them a little bit. I would be happy if they went to a bowl in real life, and I am going to play as them again this year.
 

« Previous123Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.