Home
Feature Article
Five Toughest NCAA Football 09 Dynasty Jobs

Each year, NCAA players try to pull off the impossible by bringing teams like North Texas and Eastern Michigan to the promised land after just a couple of seasons. Every NCAA gamer contemplates what the toughest jobs in college football are, and I am no different.

If you are looking for a tough challenge this year with the NCAA Football 09 Dynasty Mode, I want you to check out my list of challenging schools and then give me some feedback on which schools you think would be toughest to take over. So without further adieu, here are the top 5 toughest schools to actually turn into a powerhouse.

5. North Texas (Sun Belt)

Right off the bat, I am sure many of you are crying foul since North Texas has not only won its conference in recent memory, but the team also dominated Sun Belt play for a few years earlier this decade. How quickly things change in the Sun Belt. North Texas is now one of the worst teams in the worst Football Bowl Subdivision conference (for the uncool kids, this is the NCAA's new way of saying division I-A), and things do not look to be getting any easier.

Coming off of a 2-10 season, the Mean Green has to replace tons of starters while fielding a very young team. The out-of-conference slate includes Kansas State, Tulsa, LSU and Rice, all of which could very well be losses. The biggest positive about this team it its youth. You will be able to build for the future with sophomore quarterback Giovanni Vizza.

Some might consider recruiting to be an easy task since North Texas is located in the high school football capital of the world. However, when you are the worst team in the state of Texas, the best recruits are long gone before you get to them. Considering the youth, the tough schedule, and the tough recruiting challenges you will be faced with, expect North Texas to take a few years to make a comeback.

4. Utah State (WAC)

What do you get when you lose a bunch of key players off a really bad team in a really bad football state? You get a long and brutal road ahead for anyone who decides to take over the reigns at Utah State. Right now, the most experienced player on the Utah State offense is tight end Rob Myers and center Ryan Tonnemacher. Neither guy is going to have a very high rating in the final version of NCAA Football 09. In the end, expect a tough job ahead while rebuilding the Aggies.

"It does not help that the WAC is not an easy conference by any stretch of the imagination. Prepare yourself for frustration."


The first big concern you will have to deal with is the fact that you are going to have to try to surpass Hawaii, Boise State and Fresno State to achieve dominance. Climbing the mountain will not be easy considering the fact that Utah State has not won a conference crown in over 11 years. The recruiting trail should be rather tough as well since there is not that much in-state talent, and what little there is will go to cross-state rival Utah or BYU.

In all reality, getting Utah State above Boise, Fresno, Utah or Hawaii is going to be very tough. It does not help that the WAC is not an easy conference by any stretch of the imagination. Prepare yourself for frustration.

3. Syracuse (Big East)

The Orange not only sport some incredibly ugly uniforms, they also sport a program which is in dire straights right now. Right now the Orange are stuck in a position that has them looking way up at the current class of the Big East. Passing West Virginia, South Florida, Pitt and Rutgers in the Big East is going to be near impossible within a couple of years.

The good news is head coach Greg Robinson brought in a decent recruiting class, which features some skilled talent as well as some decent defenders. However, returning to the bad news, you are going to have to deal with the inevitable increased expectations of a program which has won in the past. The expectations to perform will be fairly high as the virtual Syracuse fans will be looking to relive the days of Donovan McNabb at the helm.

Your biggest plus will be being the biggest program in a very populous state, but your road to success will not be easy. Expect to lose for a year or two before starting to see a turnaround. But with the added expectations of a more prestigious school, you better have a great third year to stick around as the coach of the Orange in year four.

2. Idaho (WAC)

Idaho is a program that could be defined as the pit of college football coaching careers. The Vandals play in the smallest FBS stadium (Kibbie Dome at 16,000); they also call a bad football state home; and above all other things, it has been a decade since anyone has won a conference title at Idaho -- the team has won just 16 games since 2001. The Vandals last winning season? All the way back in 1999, when Idaho finished 7-4, which was nine years ago and five coaches ago. Yikes!

 

"So what do you have to work with at Idaho? The answer is, nothing really."


Also, do not expect to be stopping too many opponents in year one, as the Vandals return just four starters to a defense which ranked 110 in scoring defense last year. The offense is returning experience, but the offense was just bad last year, averaging just 349 yards a game.

So what do you have to work with at Idaho? The answer is, nothing really. You will have to spend a ton of recruiting points to find any decent talent outside of Idaho, and you may not have many points to spare. You are also going to be recruiting against in-state heavyweight Boise State. You are going to be challenged early and often at Idaho and you are not going to have an easy road to meeting expectations.

A bowl appearance by year three will be your first challenge, while a conference crown a year or so later would be your next.

Before I list number one, let me just post a few teams that didn't quite make the cut, but are still on a short list of hard teams to make into a powerhouse: Baylor, Vanderbuilt, UNLV, San Jose St, Rice, SMU, Eastern Michigan, Florida International.

1. Duke (ACC)

And the toughest job of them all? That would be coaching Duke, a team which has not won a conference title in nearly two decades and has not had a winning season since the early 1990s. The program had its best years during the 1930s -- the best year was 1938. Any future coach of the Blue Devils will also be looking way up at the rest of the ACC, which will result in a huge gap between your team and the top teams in the ACC.

Your first task as coach of the Blue Devils will be to try to wrestle wins away from Northwestern and an Football Championship Subdivision (again, the NCAA's new cute way of saying Division 1-AA) team. Starting off 2-0 would do your program wonders, although they may be your only wins in year one. The talent gap between Duke and the rest of the ACC is enormous, which might explain why no coach sans Steve Spurrier has won there in recent memory.

The recruiting trail will be very difficult as well, with you having to compete in the Carolinas against several quality football programs as well as southern heavyweights Georgia and Florida. The problem with recruiting at Duke is you are not going to be able to catch the better talent from your region since the heavyweights will be taking the best talent first. Thus, your rebuilding process will take some time.

Your boosters will expect you to win just as quickly as an Idaho or a Utah State since the talent is just a bit higher than those schools, with the added caveat of being in a major BCS conference. The lack of talent means your success early and often will be predicated by how you manage the talent gap between your Blue Devils and your ACC opponents. In the end, there is a reason no coach has succeeded in getting Duke near a bowl game in some time. For you to succeed and reach the top of the ACC, it is going to take some skillful recruiting and coaching.

This article is also featured on Bleacher Report. Bleacher Report is where the sports bar meets the press box, the place for fan-journalists to create and critique high-quality sports analysis. Visit Bleacher Report for more video games news.


NCAA Football 09 Videos
Member Comments
# 41 jfsolo @ 07/01/08 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMT
I'll agree with Duke being #1. It is hard not to get fired unless you are playing all the games.

North Texas is hard? No way. Small schools in California, Texas, Florida, and Ohio are simple to turn into powerhouses. Your recruit pool is so deep that other teams in your conference can't keep up.
I hope that someday this gets recoded to better reflect reality. Its gotten better over that last couple years, but I think it should be much,much harder to turn weaker schools into powerhouses even if they are in a talent rich state.

I know you guys don't want to make it too difficult for users to take their scrubby school and make them a juggernaut, but I would like to see a realistic recruiting difficulty level where getting a one star team to a 4 star team would be extremely difficult and quite an accomplishment. Getting that team to a 5 or 6 star prestige, should be almost impossible IMO.
 
# 42 RaychelSnr @ 07/02/08 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMT
Have you ever tried Wyoming or Hawaii?
Funny you should mention that, I have done both. I think with prestige, you can get a few decent recruits but you do bring up a great point.

Wyoming sucks recruiting in state as does Hawaii. But all recruiting outside of Hawaii is ultra expensive. I would say both of those jobs are pretty tough just based on the recruiting aspect of things. Wyoming was probably my hardest job ever in NCAA Football next to Temple.
 
# 43 Freezer Boy @ 07/02/08 03:51 PM
Cool this gives me some good ideas about who to use in my 09 dynasty.
 
# 44 KG @ 07/02/08 06:55 PM
With Hawaii's system it's much easier to put up huge stats and attract QBs & WRs

Plus Hawaii is on a different level prestige-wise than Wyoming
 
# 45 Gamecock @ 07/02/08 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMT
I'll agree with Duke being #1. It is hard not to get fired unless you are playing all the games.

North Texas is hard? No way. Small schools in California, Texas, Florida, and Ohio are simple to turn into powerhouses. Your recruit pool is so deep that other teams in your conference can't keep up.
I'm sure you just mean it isn't hard in ncaa, right?
 
# 46 Sportsbuck @ 07/02/08 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMT
I'll agree with Duke being #1. It is hard not to get fired unless you are playing all the games.

North Texas is hard? No way. Small schools in California, Texas, Florida, and Ohio are simple to turn into powerhouses. Your recruit pool is so deep that other teams in your conference can't keep up.
One thing that has annoyed me to no end about playing as a small school is that the CPU only looks at overall record and such when making the decision to fire you or keep you around. I know this would be extremely hard but it would be nice to see them take into account the experience and depth of your team, how you've done in recruiting, amongst other things.
 
# 47 skipwondah33 @ 07/05/08 11:28 PM
pretty sweet article, each year I try to find the toughest job out, Idaho has been a no brainer for years, but there dome is herlatious so I usually go with New Mexico State or alot others as we can think of I'm sure
 
# 48 4solo @ 07/06/08 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfsolo
I hope that someday this gets recoded to better reflect reality. Its gotten better over that last couple years, but I think it should be much,much harder to turn weaker schools into powerhouses even if they are in a talent rich state.

I know you guys don't want to make it too difficult for users to take their scrubby school and make them a juggernaut, but I would like to see a realistic recruiting difficulty level where getting a one star team to a 4 star team would be extremely difficult and quite an accomplishment. Getting that team to a 5 or 6 star prestige, should be almost impossible IMO.
Yea i agree istshould be very difficult to turn around these programs even if it's a football talented state. One thing i don't like about playing with a small school is that when your're doing in season recruiting it seems unrealistic that you would even be the last school on a 5 star recruit list competing with 4,5,and 6 star schools. No recruit is not going to be intrested in Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, ............ Rice. WTF?
 
# 49 TheGamingChef @ 07/06/08 02:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4solo
Yea i agree istshould be very difficult to turn around these programs even if it's a football talented state. One thing i don't like about playing with a small school is that when your're doing in season recruiting it seems unrealistic that you would even be the last school on a 5 star recruit list competing with 4,5,and 6 star schools. No recruit is not going to be intrested in Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, ............ Rice. WTF?
I had the same problem playing with Toledo before. After a 8-5 season with a bowl loss I absolutely dominated OH and PA in recruiting, taking everything away from Ohio State, Penn State, etc. It was weird. I got the #6 class in the nation.
 
# 50 servo75 @ 07/09/08 07:02 AM
I wonder though, are you just picking the five worst teams, or are these just the five toughest coaching challenges given the expectations. So could we find a team that's really bad but has either lower expectations for coaches or is in good recruiting territory?
 

« Previous 123Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.