Home
Feature Article
NHL 15: Reviewer Impressions (PS4/XB1)


After a delayed and protracted PR schedule, people are finally getting to play NHL 15 on Xbox One and PS4. To say that there has been a lot made of the missing EASHL and other features would be an understatement. Fans have made their feelings known that the absent features and modes are going to impact purchasing decisions, while EA has remained steadfast in their belief that the game will stand on its own merits and make people believers (well, only for so long, as EA plans to patch in certain elements).

After playing the game for some time, three things remain clear in my mind: this is the best-looking version of the game to date, it plays very well, and it’s not worth the full asking price.

Those three things may create a dissonance for some, but the fact is that the game feels like a situation where the priorities were completely skewed towards presentation, with some emphasis on gameplay improvements as well. What this means is that game modes and functionality (read: reasons to play) have been put on the chopping block, creating an experience that’s really hard to reconcile. It’s one thing to create “a foundation” for the future; it’s another to strip out 70 percent of the modes in order to ship a product on time.

This creates a really difficult scenario for someone reviewing the game, as there are possibly other factors at play over at EA HQ. One might reasonably ask: “Why wasn’t the dev team given more time? Why were they asked to do so much with not enough resources (money, people, tech)?” These questions, and others, may never truly have answers, but we’re left with a game that, at first glance, does a lot right in some key areas, but then it just omits any reason to play it (online or offline). On top of this, it’s got some baffling omissions of basic functionality that we’ve come to, reasonably, expect as automatic in a game like this.
 


What it comes down to is that this game seems like something that would only be enjoyed by those who just want a barebones hockey experience, with one-on-one versus play or a simplified season mode. If that’s all you’re after, then maybe NHL 15 is up your alley. The problem is that this is 2014, and users have come to expect a certain amount of functionality for both their offline and online experience, and NHL 15, from what I can see so far, just doesn’t have anything resembling that experience.

Fans of the series would likely have understood if a small handful of features went on hiatus for a year (GM Connected and Live the Life, for instance), but when those things are absent as well as about 20 other modes and features, it just dispels any notion of NHL 15 possessing long-term value.

The sad thing is that my experience with NHL 15 on the ice has been quite good so far. I enjoy the pace of the game this year, and there is a lot more weight to the players and the shots. Turning the settings up to all-star or superstar and moving the gameplay slider to “hardcore” manages to create an experience where the CPU will act aggressively in certain scenarios (still not enough in the neutral zone) and force the odd turnover. They are even able to score on cycle plays in the offensive zone, which makes hit timing and poke-checking a must.

The revamped puck physics seems to have reduced the absurdly high and wonky bounces of the past and replaced them with more moderate puck bobbling and bouncing that’s closer to the ice. This means that passes will actually need to have some measure of control before they are made, and setting up one-timers can be quite difficult if under duress. The new physics have made certain passing situations a bit frustrating, but I’d rather have some possibility for error as compared to auto passes all day.
 


The types of goals being scored are a bit more familiar, with lots of sniped short-side wristers, some one-timers and some deflections. It’s a little disappointing seeing the short-side stuff still go in with such velocity and regularity, but there is still some variety thanks to the new puck physics. There is now a separation with upper and lower body for deking, and this changes the timing slightly when approaching the net and moving side to side. You’ll still be able to rifle shots, but there is a bit more pace on the dekes now, meaning things feel more deliberate.

Goalies animate somewhat better this year, but that doesn’t mean they don’t still have some odd behaviours. The puck-covering reach still happens, resulting in the odd goal, and they also still wander from the net to go after pucks they shouldn’t. Then again, hybrid icing being present this year helps with some of that, and the 12-man collision physics creates for some hilarious pile-ups in front of the net.

Defense, generally speaking, seems relatively similar to before, with strafing and hitting feeling slightly more heavy and deliberate. The poke-check has a deeper lunge now, and it seems tuned about right. It is frustrating that you can no longer seem to bump the puck away from offensive players, as jostling into them rarely seems to clash with the puck, creating scenarios where players are able to sort of roll off you and still have the puck.
 


From what I’ve seen of the presentation, it certainly looks like a good deal of effort went into that, creating a dramatically better game day experience (video of arena flyovers, voiceovers, graphics). The NBC branding and commentary team give that piece of the game a good shot in the arm, but the commentary does seem like a first-year effort, thanks to some docile line reads and less-than-ideal audio stitching. Mike Emrick actually falls behind the play quite a bit, which can be bothersome. I do like the three-man team, though, as Ray Ferraro adds some solid insights from down at ice level. The arenas themselves look tremendous, as does the revamped crowd tech. There is fantastic detail in each of the arenas, as the stairways, banners, jumbotrons, boards, ice and sightlines all feel unique from one another. This detail is amplified by the new crowd, which gets copious screen time on goals and period breaks, showing unique character models who add a great deal of frenzy to the game. Kudos on that crowd. Of course, the player models also look dramatically better, often presenting a strikingly similar facsimile to their real-life counterpart.

But then we’re left with reality of the situation: there just isn’t much to do in NHL 15. Be-A-Pro has basically been untouched — you know, except for the fact that you can’t sim shifts anymore, making the mode effectively useless. There is no Live the Life or meaningful career equivalent, and Be-A-GM is basically season mode with trades (no drafting). Add on to this the slew of smaller modes and features that are missing, such as Shootout, Winter Classic, Battle for the Cup, custom music or player creation, and things just start to seem really off.

Everything feels similarly wrong online, with just one-on-one play available (and even that has had a few lag hiccups). But don’t worry about any of the previous stuff, because Hockey Ultimate Team (HUT) is prominently displayed for all to see. Of course it is. The fact that this mode has been included (and many other things haven’t) speaks volumes about EA’s priorities right now. I feel sad for the dev team having to prop up EA's ridiculous moneymaker in the face of such a (seemingly) incomplete product.

Final Thoughts

Our review of NHL 15 will be posted during the week, but these impressions obviously don’t paint a very good picture for the new generation of hockey. It’s frustrating, disappointing and sad, because I know so many people who were hopeful for this game. Well, the game seems to be there, but the reasons to play it are apparently not.


NHL 15 Videos
Member Comments
# 41 Inflict @ 09/08/14 11:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christian9
Dude do you work for EA??? Seriously. You just joined here and seem to have no clue what you're talking about. Your quoting other games with somewhat inaccurate information.
Nah. Long time lurker who is trying to bridge unrealistic expectations. What inaccurate information are you talking about?
 
# 42 Sheba2011 @ 09/09/14 01:13 AM
Most of the outrage would have been quelled if they released the game for $29.99 or $39.99. Most of us would have still bought it on day 1 and accepted that it was basically a very beautiful but limited game and happily waited for the content updates to make it at least somewhat playable. Some of us even would have paid for DLC like a full featured GM Mode. EAC messed up monumentally with this in two ways, charging full price for half a game and complete breakdown in communication.
 
# 43 Sheba2011 @ 09/09/14 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gsanda
Thank you for this article. Since I read this, I read many comments of frustrated consumers on Google, twitter, etc. I have purchased EA Sports hockey games nearly every year, but now I cancelled my order through Amazon. I emailed Amazon and asked them to consider assuming some responsibility for promoting and selling an incomplete and unfinished product for FULL PRICE. Maybe when retailers start standing up for consumers, Manufacturers would present better products before trying to sell them.
I understand your frustration but it's not the responsibility of Amazon, GS, Best Buy or any other retailer. If any of those stores removed products everytime customers complained they would all be out of business. The responsibility is entirely EA and the consumer. EA to not charge full price for an incomplete game and the consumer not to purchase it.
 
# 44 Sheba2011 @ 09/09/14 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spidertour02
Unless you live in New York City like I do, where there IS no Walmart.
I live in Thailand where none of these stores exist and you have to buy the game imported from Hong Kong with import tax. Usually new games cost between $65 and as much as $85 depending on the title. American sports games are usually sold at cost otherwise they won't sell here. Needless to say I won't spending that much on this game. I'll wait till I'm back in the US and it's in the $20 bin at GS.
 
# 45 CheapyD @ 09/09/14 02:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba2011
Most of the outrage would have been quelled if they released the game for $29.99 or $39.99. Most of us would have still bought it on day 1 and accepted that it was basically a very beautiful but limited game and happily waited for the content updates to make it at least somewhat playable. Some of us even would have paid for DLC like a full featured GM Mode. EAC messed up monumentally with this in two ways, charging full price for half a game and complete breakdown in communication.

My guess is their contract with the NHL specifies a "full-priced" retail release.
 
# 46 EliJ27 @ 09/09/14 03:59 AM
in create a player you can't even edit a goalies pad color, custom faces are gone, you have to pick from the generic faces they put in the game, the word bank for your player name is really shrunken down, idk i'm really bummed right now..
 
# 47 EliJ27 @ 09/09/14 04:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliJ27
in create a player you can't even edit a goalies pad color, custom faces are gone, you have to pick from the generic faces they put in the game, the word bank for your player name is really shrunken down, idk i'm really bummed right now..
man I just wish that if they keep charging you almost $70 for these games they'd let you have full control over your game that you buy..
 
# 48 AdamJones113 @ 09/09/14 04:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliJ27
man I just wish that if they keep charging you almost $70 for these games they'd let you have full control over your game that you buy..
Did you just reply to yourself?
 
# 49 Nate99 @ 09/09/14 06:28 AM
I can't believe they couldn't even get edit player in the game, how incomplete is this game!
 
# 50 EliJ27 @ 09/09/14 08:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJones113
Did you just reply to yourself?
lolol i didnt mean too, and then i figured it'd just look like i was adding on to what was previously said and i could play it off cool ha.
 
# 51 DBMcGee3 @ 09/09/14 10:57 AM
I played the demo for a few minutes this morning and thought it was pretty blah. It should be noted that I'm not a hockey enthusiast, but it plays exactly the same as the last couple, iterations I played. Graphics are pretty good, but nothing to write home about. I have no idea what all they've 'stripped down' for the game, but I can definitely see how that would upset people and kill sales numbers.

EA has its moments, but all in all they're a pretty terrible company from a consumer's standpoint.
 
# 52 russ99 @ 09/09/14 12:00 PM
I'm still getting it.

The commitment to add missing modes works for me. If they bring back the AHL games/management to Be-A-GM, that will satisfy 95% of what I get out of the NHL series, since I don't really spend a lot of time with online play or EA's cash cow (HUT).

So I'll play two GM seasons this year, start with the bare bones one, then start over when they fix it.

If people want to boycott, that's understandable. But let's hit them where it hurts. A one-year boycott on microtransaction purchase across all EA games.
 
# 53 enice128 @ 09/09/14 12:35 PM
I completely understand how a lot of people feel regarding the game launching with very important modes not included. However, myself as a huge hockey fan am in love with the new upgrades such as presentation especially with the addition of my 2 fav commentators. Gameplay still needs some work but c'mon people....it's a f****g video game! I love the nhl way too much to not be playing this game & I know what a lot u r gonna say.....that I'm giving in to EA by purchasing this game at launch, a game which is flawed & incomplete. My main point being is that just watch......when this game is finally updated by i believe in Oct with all of its modes all the haters & bashers will eventually purchase......I promise!!!
 
# 54 enice128 @ 09/09/14 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by russ99
I'm still getting it.

The commitment to add missing modes works for me. If they bring back the AHL games/management to Be-A-GM, that will satisfy 95% of what I get out of the NHL series, since I don't really spend a lot of time with online play or EA's cash cow (HUT).

So I'll play two GM seasons this year, start with the bare bones one, then start over when they fix it.

If people want to boycott, that's understandable. But let's hit them where it hurts. A one-year boycott on microtransaction purchase across all EA games.
Haha...me too!
 
# 55 Sheba2011 @ 09/09/14 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheapyD
My guess is their contract with the NHL specifies a "full-priced" retail release.
I would imagine it's either a certain percentage of sales or a set amount of money every year, not so much a set price for the game.
 
# 56 SGMRock @ 09/09/14 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by statnut
And that was then. When Madden and FIFA hit next-gen, they managed to get everything in and add things like coach glass, etc.
I think FIFA and Madden have a bigger dev team and bigger budget though. Also I think that Madden 25 on the Xbox One was basically a port from the 360 because they didn't do much with the graphics game play unlike Madden 15 where you can see they actually used the power of the new consoles, I would expect FIFA 15 will be he same where we will see them dig into the power of the new consoles. Next year I would expect Madden 15 and FIFA 15 to do that even more.

As for NHL 15 I think they will keep patching in modes as they can while they recreate them for NHL 16 as I expect NHL 16 to basically be this years play and presentation with all the missing stuff added back in. They will leave some stuff out of 15 for sure to make us by 16 to get everything back we missed from 15.
 
# 57 BCDX97 @ 09/09/14 06:14 PM
Seems like the reviewer went in wanting to complain about stuff and so he complained.

I wonder how many people here actually play sports video games and how many just complain about them on the internet.

Before the internet, did you all sit around with your friends complaining about games?
 
# 58 statnut @ 09/09/14 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCDX97
Seems like the reviewer went in wanting to complain about stuff and so he complained.

I wonder how many people here actually play sports video games and how many just complain about them on the internet.

Before the internet, did you all sit around with your friends complaining about games?
Of course he would complain about stuff, there's a legit beef there.

And for the record, I play sports games all the time. Played Madden earlier today, NHL 14 last night. Have been getting NHL Day 1 for a long time and still own NHL 94.
 
# 59 Rhinoboy50 @ 09/09/14 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba2011
Most of the outrage would have been quelled if they released the game for $29.99 or $39.99. Most of us would have still bought it on day 1 and accepted that it was basically a very beautiful but limited game and happily waited for the content updates to make it at least somewhat playable. Some of us even would have paid for DLC like a full featured GM Mode. EAC messed up monumentally with this in two ways, charging full price for half a game and complete breakdown in communication.

EXACTLY! I look at games like recently released The Golf Club which sells for $34.99. It, like NHL 15, intend to add more post release but it is priced accordingly both as a lesser game and being from a smaller studio. Similarly, when Gran Turismo Prologue arrived, it was reduced significantly in price due to the amount of content. That NHL 15 is being sold for full price adds to the already established "money grubbing" reputation of EA.
 
# 60 8iron @ 09/09/14 06:52 PM
This strikes me as nothing but EA hate. Everyone on these boards is fawning over the Golf Club (probably deservedly), for focusing on game play and not putting in a bunch of fluff that would have sacrificed quality game play.

EA Canada made decisions to use the resources they had to produce a game that the most people would enjoy. They came right out and said they had data that one mode they axed didn't get played all that much. Huff huff but they got in HUT...yeah...people like HUT. UT is a microtransaction champ for EA because people love it.

I'm not the typical OSer...I believe however that I'm much more the typical EA franchise buyer. I play Ultimate Team until contracts would cost me money, then I play a few seasons as GM or player. I wish a few things were different in every game (more frequent penalties would be nice in all of them) but those absences don't ruin the experience for me.

$60 is too much for almost every game. $120 is certainly too much to pay for COD every year but tons of people do it. Plenty of people pay $60 a year for "roster updates" in one or more sports games of their choice. And they play Play Now games or they go online and "cheese" and have a ton of fun doing it, then they trade in this year's copy next year for a few bucks off the next roster update.

People on boards like this are delusional with their inaccurate sneakers rage and their missing modes meltdowns. Its become impossible to get accurate information about whether the game itself is actually fun. I think the fact that most of you seem to need so many bells and whistles to distract you suggests that for you, the answer is no.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.