NBA 2K11: Starting Five Roster Ratings

Feature Article

Submitted on: 09/23/2010 by

2K Sent us the overall ratings for every player in each team's starting five. Give the list a look through and let us know what you think! Did 2K rate your team right? Any surprises? Let us know!

NBA 2K11 Videos

Member Comments

# 81 Dougmoto @ 09/23/10 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeebs9


	Stop comparing the FIBA with the NBA. The title is NBA 2K11. Not FIBA 2K11.

That's fine. Kleiza's last NBA season, he had a PER of 13.2 and averaged 10/4/1 in 22 minutes a game shooting 45% and 32.5%. Pretty crappy, but definitely not a '55' caliber player. It's fine though, I can see his rating being bumped up to a low 60 (where it probably should be) fairly quickly.

# 82 ThatSacTownKingsFan @ 09/23/10 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lmarshalljr04


	Here is the rating scale for 2k RATING GUIDE 95-99: Goats (Greatest of All-Time. Not the animal.) 90-94: Superstar (All-NBA First Team mainstays) 85-89: Perennial All-Star (All-NBA Second Team) 80-84: All-Star Caliber (possible All-Stars or even All-NBA Third Team) 75-79: Average NBA Starter (or Sixth Man of Year contenders) 70-74: Below Average Starter (or typical 6th/7th men) 65-69: Rotation Player (8th-10th men) 60-64: End of Bench (11th-15th men and most D-League callups) 55-59: Should not be in NBA (i.e. training camp invites w/ non-guaranteed deals) 50-54: Hopefully earned their college degree.

Since when was 75 - 79 classed as average? I'd say people with that rating should be great players.

I'd say 65 - 70 is "average".

# 83 davidrc517 @ 09/23/10 02:40 PM

Dirk is a perennial all-nba first team so according to that scale should be between 90-94.

And to whoever said it's not FIBA 2k11, that's pretty obvious. But that doesn't mean Eric Gordon is a different player internationally than when he's playing in the NBA.

# 84 ThatSacTownKingsFan @ 09/23/10 02:42 PM

Ya'll do know you can edit these rating, right? (Even 2k might when the season kicks off.).

# 85 Beneezy @ 09/23/10 02:43 PM

WOW!

KOBE
WADE
LEBRON

97s!!! This is when you know KOBE at 31 years of age and can still dominate the youngins! hAHAHA

# 86 elprez98 @ 09/23/10 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidrc517


	Dirk is a perennial all-nba first team so according to that scale should be between 90-94. And to whoever said it's not FIBA 2k11, that's pretty obvious. But that doesn't mean Eric Gordon is a different player internationally than when he's playing in the NBA.

He may not be different the but the offensive and defensive talent in the NBA is.

# 87 jeebs9 @ 09/23/10 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dougmoto


	That's fine. Kleiza's last NBA season, he had a PER of 13.2 and averaged 10/4/1 in 22 minutes a game shooting 45% and 32.5%. Pretty crappy, but definitely not a '55' caliber player. It's fine though, I can see his rating being bumped up to a low 60 (where it probably should be) fairly quickly.

This guy scored 50 in a game once. So lets boost him up. Thats what I see...lol jk

# 88 RocketTMac1 @ 09/23/10 02:45 PM

I think people are forgetting what was mentioned in the last update. They said there is a difference between a journeyman that is rated a 75 and a allstar player that is rated a 75. Basically if you aren't atheletic you are going to get slighted in the ratings.

My only gripe is that people forget Kleiza was a force when he was with the nuggets. 55 is not a good rating at all. and again it is your game CHANGE THE RATINGS TO WHAT YOU THINK THEY SHOULD BE!!! People will complain when they get roster updates. Realize the game has been changed 360 degrees. See how the player play then come back and complain.

# 89 chunt04 @ 09/23/10 02:47 PM

Sorry but Kevin Durant > Carmelo Anthony... the 91 and 93 respective ratings need to be reversed. And Brandon Jennings = way underrated, while Wall = way overrated

# 90 SaC_KiNg09 @ 09/23/10 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cedd311


	These ratings all seem a little off... It is insulting that Ray Allen is ranked a 79. And Paul Pierce is almost as bad. Stephen Jackson is ranked higher than piece? Come on now......

Different positions....cant compare the two

Even though SJack does play a little 3 it seems that they have him listed as a 2 on the roster breakdown

# 91 Rello91 @ 09/23/10 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cedd311


	These ratings all seem a little off... It is insulting that Ray Allen is ranked a 79. And Paul Pierce is almost as bad. Stephen Jackson is ranked higher than piece? Come on now......

thats wierd get put out in first round of the playoffs and better than pierce i dont see stephen jackson being better than paul pierce this year

# 92 jeebs9 @ 09/23/10 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidrc517


	Dirk is a perennial all-nba first team so according to that scale should be between 90-94. And to whoever said it's not FIBA 2k11, that's pretty obvious. But that doesn't mean Eric Gordon is a different player internationally than when he's playing in the NBA.

ahhh... yes he is...lol A totally different game being played out in the FIBA. Where he probably faced more zones than he has in his whole NBA career. Yea I can see he was a different player....SMH

# 93 Xetron @ 09/23/10 02:50 PM

Kleiza was 2nd best SF behind Durant in worlds and is only 55? C'mon..

# 94 Furq @ 09/23/10 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngfaze01


	-Rondo 87 > Rose 85? Don't think so. Defensively yes, overall no. -Nash an 85? He could be atleast a 91/92. He is still one of the best PGs in the league right now. He doesn't get credit as much as Deron & Paul. -Chris Paul- 95 > Deron Williams- 92? I say Deron is the better PG. -Ray Allen can stay at 79. He's inconsistant. Brandon Jennings could be atleast an 80 IMO.

I know the point isn't who is better but how is rose better overall than rondo right now?

Rondo is better at rebounding passing and is worse at athleticism traits and shooting. Defense is half the game and so it makes sense his overall is slightly better

# 95 LingeringRegime @ 09/23/10 02:51 PM

Stephen Jackson and Gerald Wallace both 84 again. I can live with that.

# 96 blues rocker @ 09/23/10 02:53 PM

good god...cheesers are salivating looking at that Heat roster. two players at 97....yikes.

# 97 jerseyballer7 @ 09/23/10 02:55 PM

wtf rose a 85

and rhondo 87

and wall 81

# 98 davidrc517 @ 09/23/10 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeebs9


	ahhh... yes he is...lol A totally different game being played out in the FIBA. Where he probably faced more zones than he has in his whole NBA career. Yea I can see he was a different player....SMH

So Eric Gordon is not as good a shooter in the NBA as he was in FIBA? Am I missing something? He barely slashed in FIBA bc of zone but that's an additional aspect of his game in the NBA. He's a great shooter, a strong slasher, and a solid defender. He should be higher than 74, period.

# 99 Nephilim @ 09/23/10 02:57 PM

Why do you guy equal this with power rankings? This is just video game skill points. Face it, some of our beloved players lack big time in some areas. If it wont show on court it wont matter (if they play like they do IRL).

# 100 toomerk @ 09/23/10 02:57 PM

Decent ratings. My problems are with Wall being rated higher than a rookie Jordan??? Also, I think Noah is rated too low. The Bulls are refusing to trade him for your "93" rated Anthony, yet he is somehow a 73??? Well, as long as Noah plays like Noah, with stingy defense, and dominating the boards, it should be ok.

Now, to all of you doubting Chris Paul. The only gripe anyone can have about him, and the only legitimate reason for ranking him lower than D Williams, is the fact that he can't stay healthy. But when he is healthy, he is a dominating player. We all seem to have forgotten this, but in '09, he was considered the second best player in the league, getting a lot of MVP talk. 95 is right on point for him.

« Previous 1 2 3 456 7 8 9…26 27 Next »

More Links