NBA 2K11: Starting Five Roster Ratings

[Dougmoto]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeebs9

Stop comparing the FIBA with the NBA. The title is NBA 2K11. Not FIBA 2K11.

That's fine. Kleiza's last NBA season, he had a PER of 13.2 and averaged 10/4/1 in 22 minutes a game shooting 45% and 32.5%. Pretty crappy, but definitely not a '55' caliber player. It's fine though, I can see his rating being bumped up to a low 60 (where it probably should be) fairly quickly.

[ThatSacTownKingsFan]

Quote: Originally Posted by lmarshalljr04

Here is the rating scale for 2k RATING GUIDE 95-99: Goats (Greatest of All-Time. Not the animal.) 90-94: Superstar (All-NBA First Team mainstays) 85-89: Perennial All-Star (All-NBA Second Team) 80-84: All-Star Caliber (possible All-Stars or even All-NBA Third Team) 75-79: Average NBA Starter (or Sixth Man of Year contenders) 70-74: Below Average Starter (or typical 6th/7th men) 65-69: Rotation Player (8th-10th men) 60-64: End of Bench (11th-15th men and most D-League callups) 55-59: Should not be in NBA (i.e. training camp invites w/ non-guaranteed deals) 50-54: Hopefully earned their college degree.

Since when was 75 - 79 classed as average? I'd say people with that rating should be great players.

I'd say 65 - 70 is "average".

[davidrc517]

Dirk is a perennial all-nba first team so according to that scale should be between 90-94.

And to whoever said it's not FIBA 2k11, that's pretty obvious. But that doesn't mean Eric Gordon is a different player internationally than when he's playing in the NBA.

[ThatSacTownKingsFan]

Ya'll do know you can edit these rating, right? (Even 2k might when the season kicks off.).

[Beneezy]

WOW!

KOBE
WADE
LEBRON

97s!!! This is when you know KOBE at 31 years of age and can still dominate the youngins! hAHAHA

[elprez98]

Quote: Originally Posted by davidrc517

Dirk is a perennial all-nba first team so according to that scale should be between 90-94. And to whoever said it's not FIBA 2k11, that's pretty obvious. But that doesn't mean Eric Gordon is a different player internationally than when he's playing in the NBA.

He may not be different the but the offensive and defensive talent in the NBA is.

[jeebs9]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dougmoto

That's fine. Kleiza's last NBA season, he had a PER of 13.2 and averaged 10/4/1 in 22 minutes a game shooting 45% and 32.5%. Pretty crappy, but definitely not a '55' caliber player. It's fine though, I can see his rating being bumped up to a low 60 (where it probably should be) fairly quickly.

This guy scored 50 in a game once. So lets boost him up. Thats what I see...lol jk

[RocketTMac1]

I think people are forgetting what was mentioned in the last update. They said there is a difference between a journeyman that is rated a 75 and a allstar player that is rated a 75. Basically if you aren't atheletic you are going to get slighted in the ratings.

My only gripe is that people forget Kleiza was a force when he was with the nuggets. 55 is not a good rating at all. and again it is your game CHANGE THE RATINGS TO WHAT YOU THINK THEY SHOULD BE!!! People will complain when they get roster updates. Realize the game has been changed 360 degrees. See how the player play then come back and complain.