Home
Feature Article
NBA Elite 11 Interview With Creative Director David Littman
We recently had a chance to interview David Littman, creative director at EA Canada for NHL Slapshot, NBA Elite and the NHL series. He helped to oversee the re-imagining of the NHL series when the current-generation consoles were released, and he is now filling a similar role for NBA Elite 11. We wanted this interview to focus on the differences between the rebuilds of NHL and Elite, and we also wanted to get a bit deeper into why NBA Elite is going in a different direction this year.

Operation Sports: When I look back at how the NHL franchise was rebooted on the current-gen consoles, it almost seems like the same blueprint is being used to reboot the Live/Elite series. What I mean is that it seems like there is a heavy focus on physics, controls and graphics. Is this a fair and mostly accurate comparison?

David Littman: It is the same blueprint. But, it isn’t about physics, controls and graphics.
  • It is about giving the gamer the exact same tools that a pro athlete has and letting gamers create their own brilliance.
  • It is about giving you the feeling that you are on the ice/court in front of 20,000 fans.
  • It is about making the gamer the star online and becoming the best virtual athlete in the world.
  • It is about making a shot with no time left to win a game for your team, knowing that it was YOUR skill that did it.

Before doing anything we ask ourselves: “What makes playing real life basketball fun? What makes playing real life hockey fun?” It is fun in real life to run around on a basketball court and shoot a basketball all by yourself. It is fun in real life to skate around on a hockey rink and shoot a hockey puck all by yourself. So before we do anything, we have to get this right. How can we make dribbling, stick handling, and shooting in our sports games MIMIC real life? Because if we do, then it will be fun also.

It is fun to do these things in real life because there is SKILL involved. Making a 3-pointer takes skill. Stick handling a puck and shooting top corner takes skill. Before ANYTHING else, these things need to be fun to do. I think that has been part of the problem with basketball games of this generation. The basics of playing the sport were not the main focus. The main focus was on signature styles, more and more animations, player likenesses, broadcast presentation and making the game LOOK like an NBA basketball game. Before I get flamed for saying this, I am not saying these things are not important, nor am I saying that these games were not enjoyed by many basketball fans. But the issue is that these things don’t matter much if we haven’t nailed the basics first. Elite still has signature shots. We still have team-specific play styles. We can even have player-specific signature behavior with our REAL AI technology (see below). But first and foremost, we need to nail the basics of what makes PLAYING basketball fun.

Specifically though, all gamers expect top-notch graphics, so it is a given that we must have that. Controls and physics are a huge part of the reboot for NHL and NBA because:
  • We need to mimic the controls as closely as possible to real life (that is where the Skill Stick and Hands-On control come in)
  • There needs to be skill involved in succeeding, because that makes people feel good (skill based shooting)
  • You should always be in control of your character (real physics instead of long collision animations and two-player animations)
  • We want the game to be totally unpredictable and move towards emergent gameplay instead of anything canned (real physics, ball is loose)

OS: From a quality standpoint, do you feel like you're in better shape to capitalize with Elite on the first go-round than you were with NHL? To clarify my own position, I would say while NHL 07 was a nice first effort, it was not as feature-rich or nearly as deep on the gameplay front as it is today -- or compared to the competition at the time.

Littman: NHL 07 was basically starting from scratch on brand new consoles. People think we had two years to build NHL 07, but we actually only had one. We were using incredible new EA developed technologies (ANT – Animation Tool Kit, for example) that were in its infancy. Other companies just ported their PS2 and Xbox sports games to the PS3 and 360 and up-ressed the graphics. As a company, we took our lumps for a year or two. Since we didn’t port our games, we had to start over with our feature sets. But, over the last couple of years it has really started to pay off for us (NHL, FIFA and now Elite, for example). Our technology has attracted some of the best people in the industry. So when we combine incredible people with incredible technology, we have the building blocks to make great sports games.

The big difference between NHL 07 and NBA Elite 11 is that on NBA Elite 11, we are not starting from scratch. NBA Live 10 was considered the best Live game of this generation of consoles. A lot of what people loved in NBA Live 10 is still in the game…we just improved a lot of it. So even if you play the game in the broadcast camera (yes, it is still there, just not the default) and use button controls (yes, it is still in there, just not the default), you will still have a much improved NBA Live 10 experience.

We have also done a much better job of sharing technology at EA Sports over the last few years. Besides ANT, an example of this is the REAL AI technology we are using on Elite 11. You will hear more on this soon. This technology was something we developed on NHL 08 and it makes the AI play like a human. It does this because humans -- mostly producers and software engineers (SEs) -- can play the game and the AI can then use the best most successful moves themselves when the time is right. With our new one-to-one movement and dribbling, and the new physics, the AI would not be able to pull off new, creative on-the-fly moves without this technology. Fight Night Round 4 also used this tech to help them get each fighter to fight like their real-life self.

I was playing a game of Elite the other day and someone walked by and said “Oh, you’re playing online? Who are our playing against?” It is because the CPU team looked like a human opponent.

The other big difference is that we are adding two new game modes this year on Elite 11. It took us three years on NHL to get these two game modes.

1. The new Become Legendary is our take on Be a Pro modes that starts with the Jordan Brand draft showcase game that is in the demo, and takes you on a journey to become a basketball legend.

2. The new EA Sports Basketball Association (EASBA) is an online league where you create your character, with your name on the back of your jersey, create or join a team with your friends, and take on all challengers to become the best basketball team in the world. It is based on the EA Sports Hockey League (EASHL) which has over 500,000 gamers playing in it. For the EASHL, we even flew the top 360 team and top PS3 team to Vancouver for a worldwide Championship (more details to come for the EASBA).

OS: This might be a bit hard to quantify, but if you were to compare NHL and Elite at this point, which franchise had to go though the bigger first-year rebuild?

Littman: As stated in my last answer, we are in a much better position for Elite 11. Besides the mature technology and using NBA Live 10 as the base, it is the people that make the biggest difference. NHL 07 was a team that was quickly put together with a bunch of people from NHL 06 (PS2/Xbox) and people from around the studio. So the NHL leadership team led by Dean Richards (NHL 07 line producer), Jeff Atienza and I knew that we needed to put together an all-star team to execute on the three-year plan that we had for the franchise. Dean is amazing at putting together great teams. By NHL 09, we had that team and we still do.

The people on NBA Elite 11 are already an all-star team. We have basketball experts and some of the best SEs that I have ever worked with. There are many heroes on the team, some of them you already know, as they are on the forums interacting with the community. But there are also some that you never hear about, but are just as important. Nick Channon is running the team day to day, and he and I talk all the time about how passionate this team is about making a great playing, authentic basketball game. I am really proud to be part of this team, just as I am proud to be part of the NHL team.

OS: In general, has this been more of a challenge than the one undertaken with NHL?

Littman: They each have separate challenges. As stated previously, NHL’s reboot had the challenge of starting from scratch, brand new technologies and a new team.

The big challenge with NBA is we are fundamentally changing the way people play basketball games. The one-to-one control of dribbling and defense, the skill-based shooting system, the real-physics system instead of canned animations, are all game changers. But all of that isn’t even the toughest part.

The toughest part is convincing the hardcore basketball fans that this is the most realistic basketball game we have ever made. The reason this is so difficult is because basketball gamers have become used to a certain type of basketball game. These are basketball games where the most important part of the game was that it LOOKED like real basketball. It needed to be from the TV-style broadcast camera. It needed every signature animation that real players have. It needed two-player animations, so that it could use mo-cap (motion capture) animations exactly like they were captured in the studio. It became an animations arms race. Which game could have more animations became the focus. No other sports video games have had this animation battle. While animation is obviously important in FIFA, NHL and MLB: The Show…that is not why people love these games. People love them for the overall gameplay feel. It feels like you are PLAYING the sport, not just influencing the sport.

Henry Ford once said that if he asked the public what they wanted, they would have said, "a faster horse." That is how I feel. The games I have worked on have done a decent job of interacting with the community, and I can honestly say that many features in NHL and NBA are based on community feedback. But before this year, if we had asked the basketball community what they wanted, it would have been more signature shots, more animations, better presentation…in other words, "a faster horse."

Now I just hope that the Hands-On control and real physics take off like the automobile did.

OS: Before you folks decided that the NBA franchise was going to be overhauled, how long was it discussed? Was this a change that was decided on while NBA Live 10 was still being completed?

Littman: Just before and just after NBA Live 10 came out, there was a lot of discussion as to why basketball games are among the lowest-rated sports games on the market. Hockey, soccer, football, Baseball, boxing, UFC, etc. all have games that have higher Metacritic scores (average review scores across many media outlets). There was also a lot of discussion as to why the basketball category has been shrinking over the last few years (overall revenue/sales), and categories like hockey and soccer have been growing.

Are these two points related? Of course they are.

So while all of this was being talked about, I walked into Brent Nielsen’s office (NBA executive producer) and I showed him a PowerPoint deck that I put together. It had Hands-On control, Be a Pro, EA Sports Basketball Association, a bullet point that said, “Absolutely NO two-player animations,” and a few other things. At around the same time, Geoff Harrower (known on Operation Sports as rEAnimator) had an amazing demo in our ANT technology showing real physics for all player interaction. Brent gave me the go ahead to work with him on a prototype for Hands-On controls. A week later we had one, and everyone on the team and around the studio played it, and everyone absolutely loved it. That was the beginning of NBA Elite 11.

OS: When I've spoken with you in the past, you have pointed to Metacritic as a sign of progress and a reason why NHL and FIFA have been so successful. Do you feel like this change to the controls might give Elite a bit of a ratings push by default? For example, when NHL 07 came out, many argued that NHL 2K7 was the more polished/deeper game, but plenty of people were still immediately drawn to NHL 07 even though it was a relatively bare-bones title in comparison. In addition, while NHL 07 did not hit 80 on the Metacritic scale, it still beat out NHL 2K7 by a point on that same scale.

Littman: That is true. NHL 2K7 had more modes and overall was more polished because of how each company went about the transition to the next generation (as stated above).

The fact that we almost hit 80 Metacritic with NHL 07 really shows you the power of giving gamers the same tools that athletes have in real life. The one-to-one movement for deking and the act of shooting on the goalie instead of pressing a button was so compelling that people forgave us for the rest of the game. When I go back and play it now, it is kind of scary how bad it is compared to now. It was at 30 frames per second. It had very few game modes. But when you deked a goalie out of his jockstrap on a breakaway like you could in real life, people jumped off the couch with excitement. We also had a very clear three-year plan with gameplay (Year 1 – skill stick offense vs. goalie, Year 2 – skill stick offense vs. defensemen, Year 3 – skill stick defense). We have an awesome three-year plan for the Elite franchise also.

But overall, it is not specifically the control change that I expect will give Elite the push.
  • It is when you dribble for the first time and you realize that it is the closest thing to really being on the court in real life.
  • It is when you hit your first shot to win a game and you realize it was your skill that did it.
  • It is when you go up for a dunk, make contact with an opponent, and adjust to your left hand for the lay-up.
  • It is when you block your first shot and realize how powerful defense is.
  • It is when you see your name in ESPN-style headlines in Dynasty mode.
  • It is when you step out onto an NBA court in Become Legendary (Be a Pro) and see the arena from your point of view.
  • It is when you create yourself, create a team with your buddies and win a monthly Championship in the EASBA.

OS: As a developer, is rebuilding a franchise the most exciting and at the same time most frightening thing you get to do? Or does building a franchise from "scratch" fit that description a bit better?

Littman: The best part of my job is that there are always new challenges. The NHL and NBA have different challenges. Getting people who don’t like hockey to play a hockey video game was a tough challenge, but we succeeded. I was the creative director on NHL Slapshot for the Wii this year also. Trying to make a great playing Wii sports game with a peripheral or accessory was a tough challenge, but we succeeded. Getting NBA gamers to try something new when they are used to something different is a tough challenge, but I believe we will succeed there also.

Is the game going to be perfect this year? Of course not, but that will always be our goal.

All I care about is making the best, most authentic sports games that as many people as possible will enjoy. My job is to make sure that it happens.

OS: Are you concerned at all people might view the new controls as a gimmick to "save" the franchise? And this has to be a game you want to get to the people in the form of a demo way before its official release date, right?

Littman: We have been saying all year that people need to try Elite to really understand how close to reality the new Hands-On controls really are. I said before that we are making a game that FEELS like you are playing real basketball as opposed to watching a game on TV. So seeing videos and reading this interview might not change people’s minds. But playing it will.

The demo is really important to us this year. It is a very deep demo this year that we will discuss soon, but there is an interactive tutorial and practice mode where you will learn the basics and experiment to find new moves.

The biggest reason that I know this is no gimmick is this story. I lost a game a couple of weeks ago to Novell Thomas, our gameplay producer (It was a late night at work, and we play a lot at night so we can prioritize things to improve for the next day). I was missing a lot of outside shots. I missed a 3-pointer with no time left that would have tied the game. On my way home from work, I was practicing my shot with my thumb. Straight up, hold and release. Straight up, hold and release. I did it about 10 times and that is when it hit me. This is a real sport. I was practicing my shot like players do before a free throw or that golfers do even without a club. You have a technique and you need to practice it to become the best. Never before in a sports video game have I ever practiced my technique like it was a real sport. That is how I know we will succeed.


A big thanks goes out to David Littman for answering our questions.
NBA Elite 11 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 Jano @ 08/24/10 05:23 PM
Great interview!! This exactly the direction I've been wanting to see a basketball game go in. It hit on so many points I've been thinking about for years now, the whole animations arm's race bit in paticular.

To some this interview won't sound like much but the things he was talking about here are what I've been wanting to see in bball games since I played Live 2003.

This interview was so in-tune with my view of how a basketball game should be played its scary lol
 
# 2 mlp111 @ 08/24/10 05:34 PM
nothing new, still losing interest in this game more and more as the days past by!!!!!!!!
 
# 3 noshun @ 08/24/10 05:48 PM
I thought this was about basketball..read so much hockey info...didnt even finish reading.
 
# 4 TreyIM2 @ 08/24/10 05:49 PM
I can't wait to test this pup out in the demo. I just hope that the animations, smoothness and fluidity is there unlike much of what I've seen in the vids shown thus far. By far, this is my most anticipated game for the rest of the year.
 
# 5 ehh @ 08/24/10 06:03 PM
This was much more in depth but still pretty much the same, and only, thing EA has been talking about in regards to Elite.
 
# 6 brs2305 @ 08/24/10 06:15 PM
Great interview! Always interesting to see things from a producer standpoint.

Of course there are doubts, but think about the past. Whenever somebody came up with something absolutely new to people, these guys got laughed at at first or in many cases even worse (think about the world is round not flat kind of stuff).

Of course this will be far from away from a "round world theory", but it's the same problem (convincing people).

So all what I am saying is, that I will definitely try this game out. The worst thing that could happen is that it blows. But there is also a chance that it might be the beginning of something great like NHL 11.
 
# 7 nccomicfan @ 08/24/10 06:58 PM
I am first to admit I am not a stick virtuoso, I win or lose by strategy and knowledge of the sport..The more I hear from these guys, the more I worry that my enjoyment of this title may be hindered by the totally stick driven gameplay

Before you say it, I know I can use the button controls, but somehow I doubt that will be enabled for head to head online, which is where this game beat it's competition last year
 
# 8 nccomicfan @ 08/24/10 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehh
This was much more in depth but still pretty much the same, and only, thing EA has been talking about in regards to Elite.
agreed, it just keeps the theme that this is the year for the new controls and this title may not be fleshed out overall
 
# 9 tdplaya04 @ 08/24/10 07:01 PM
I'm not sure I like this new shot stick mess, remember this is a video game not real life basketball, i should be able to make shots according to how good the player can shoot, I dont want to miss open shots with ray allen all the time because I didnt aim strait on shot stick!!!
 
# 10 scottyp180 @ 08/24/10 07:11 PM
This is pretty much what we have been hearing from EA all summer. It seems like they are really banking on the demo to attract fans. Personally I'm a 2k fan, but I am a basketball fan first and foremost, I buy the game that I enjoy most. Last year Live's demo had me considering buying the game but I chose 2k in the end. I'm really anticipating this demo, as everyone should. I never understood fanboys who stand by just one game, both Elite and 2k11 have potential to be great this year, could be the first time since 05 that I actually buy both games.
 
# 11 Live_4real @ 08/24/10 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyp180
This is pretty much what we have been hearing from EA all summer. It seems like they are really banking on the demo to attract fans. Personally I'm a 2k fan, but I am a basketball fan first and foremost, I buy the game that I enjoy most. Last year Live's demo had me considering buying the game but I chose 2k in the end. I'm really anticipating this demo, as everyone should. I never understood fanboys who stand by just one game, both Elite and 2k11 have potential to be great this year, could be the first time since 05 that I actually buy both games.
The problem is people don´t care about basketball, they don´t look for the best basketball/NBA experience, they look for that specific company experience regardless

Good read, I just hope that people that qualified this guy as the "Hockey guy" realize that he is a intelligent dude and he nows what to do to revolutionize sports gaming by giving extra user control, even if he is not a basketball brain, they have people at EA that are, so that "problem" invented in the beginning was non existing

Time will tell if this 3 year project will put Elite series in the 90`s regularly, and time will tell if NBA ELITE 11 will be a TOTAL experience, knowing that the 1 year dev cycle could be short, to do the necessary changes that NBA live 10 NEEDED

PeAcE
 
# 12 scottyp180 @ 08/24/10 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdplaya04
I'm not sure I like this new shot stick mess, remember this is a video game not real life basketball, i should be able to make shots according to how good the player can shoot, I dont want to miss open shots with ray allen all the time because I didnt aim strait on shot stick!!!
I feel you but what worries me is the complete opposite. If shooting is as skill based as they say then I should be able to perfect any players shot. So if I have kobe or ray allen's shot down pat will I not miss a shot with them unless I make a mistake or the computer blocks me? My guess is that the players hot spot (the point you release the stick/ball) will change depending where you are on the court and how well someone is defending you.

I just hope that good shooters shouldn't ruin the game. I shouldn't be able to just rain down shots all day just because I am good with a player's shot. Whether I am someone as good a Kobe or a poor shooter like rondo learning and knowing someones shot should not make them better than they actually are.
 
# 13 Tha_Kid @ 08/24/10 07:56 PM
Thing is there is a lot I like in this interview, but the game footage just hasn't been living up to it. I'm looking forward to better footage and a demo of (hopefully) the final build.

As far as the Skill Stick (cute name), I have to say I am in favor of it. Shooting in basketball games is generally kind of up in the air but usually rewards strategy & execution, etc. Whatever Live 10 was doing wasn't rewarding for a lot of gamers and it showed on these forums. I look forward to skill based shooting as there are situations in 2K where I know (or feel strongly) that a player probably has no chance of making a certain shot (see J.R. Smith, once his shooting streak hit blue in the new video). That shot going in is a rarity, but I'm excited about being in complete control of whether or not he can shoot himself back in the game.
 
# 14 nccomicfan @ 08/24/10 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Murder
Well aim strait, otherwise its your fault.
I think that is his point, the shot should be made or missed based on ratings, not purely on his stick movement
 
# 15 thesniper321 @ 08/24/10 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyp180
I feel you but what worries me is the complete opposite. If shooting is as skill based as they say then I should be able to perfect any players shot. So if I have kobe or ray allen's shot down pat will I not miss a shot with them unless I make a mistake or the computer blocks me? My guess is that the players hot spot (the point you release the stick/ball) will change depending where you are on the court and how well someone is defending you.

I just hope that good shooters shouldn't ruin the game. I shouldn't be able to just rain down shots all day just because I am good with a player's shot. Whether I am someone as good a Kobe or a poor shooter like rondo learning and knowing someones shot should not make them better than they actually are.
tbh I absolutly disagree!! I mean did you read how shooting in the game works before posting? The sweet spot is not always same , it changes with the distance, it changes if you're well guarded. Which means 1 player doesn't have 1 release but MULTIPLE ones!!
And as littman said it shouldn't be underling stat and a random dice and roll effect which decide if I make a shot with rondo or kobe it should be ME and only ME.
If I work HARD to shoot well with a poor shooter that's MY choice. Because the fact that he's not reliable reflects in a higher difficulty to hit a jumper. Nobody would be mad if someone hits 6/6 mid range jumper with rondo because we would all know how hard it is to shoot with him.
And the last sentence of your comment annoys me so much!! Each nba player has his weapons and weaknesses like I said it shouldn't be the game BUT ME who decide how good is Rondo, me me and nobody or nothing else because in the end I will be the guy who uses Rondo skills and therefore MY decisions and of course the situations will determined how good he is.
Let's take a very simple example. Rudy Fernandez is a good shooter but he doesn't drop a lot of points because of his PT and the blazers doesn't runs a lot of play for him. If I decide to shoot a lot with him, run a lot of plays for him and burn you with 30 points will you pm me and say "you're a cheater rudy isn't that good in real life??"
hhhmmmm think about it again
 
# 16 Haval93 @ 08/24/10 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nccomicfan
I think that is his point, the shot should be made or missed based on ratings, not purely on his stick movement
This is a hard subject for different people but I agree with the team on this. If I make the shot thats because of and if I miss thats on me as well. Also remember that each players sweet-spot is different. Ray Allen will be more forgiving then other shooters so you can still make a bit of error and drain the shot. This is for the best, I don't want the CPU to decide whether or not I should make the shot. Anyways the interview was nice but how come OS couldn't cop a couple new screens for us
 
# 17 Tha_Kid @ 08/24/10 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haval93
This is a hard subject for different people but I agree with the team on this. If I make the shot thats because of and if I miss thats on me as well. Also remember that each players sweet-spot is different. Ray Allen will be more forgiving then other shooters so you can still make a bit of error and drain the shot. This is for the best, I don't want the CPU to decide whether or not I should make the shot. Anyways the interview was nice but how come OS couldn't cop a couple new screens for us
I agree. Also, for the Rondo example, if you practice his shot and get good with it, aren't you just doing what Boston fans want Rondo to do? Don't you find it cool to potentially have a direct hand on his shooting progression in a Dynasty?

There was a thread about skill vs. ratings gameplay : http://www.operationsports.com/forum...-gameplay.html

rEAnimator had a very good post on it: http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2041362898

Quote:
Originally Posted by rEAnimator
This discussion is a good one. I'm excited that people are as passionate about gameplay as I am

I'm hearing quite a bit of concern over the "stick skills" aspect of the game so I wanted to comment on that a little bit.

Yes, how well you execute your shot with the right stick will determine if the shot goes in or not. If you execute the *perfect* shot every time the shot will go in every time.

Having played the game, seen data on shots made by people who are playing the game for the first time or have been playing the game since we started development last year I can say with confidence that we can tune a difficult shot to be almost impossible to make.

We can also tune an easy shot to be so easy my grandma could hit the shot (with a little instruction and practice maybe).

The difficulty of the shot will be determined by player ratings and context (contested, settled, distance, momentum, etc).

What this means is that if you want to try and master the stick skills, go right ahead. You'll hit a higher percentage of difficult shots and you may have an edge. But you would have to be super human to hit every shot. I don't think it's going to happen, and if it does we'll know and we'll re-tune things to correct it.

However, if you know your personnel, understand what makes a high percentage shot, you can overcome poor stick skills with superior strategic skills and patience.

For me this mirrors real life. Some players may not have a good basketball mind, but they can use raw skill to make their mark. Other players may not be the most skilled, but their basketball knowledge makes them effective.

The best players will be the players that master both. But if you get good enough on either extreme you should still be able to compete.

And the game is not all about shooting either. Defense plays a huge role, more so than ever before in my opinion.

Playing defense is fun, and I could not say that about last years game.

Bottom line is I'd like to reassure you that the game is not just about stick skills. Basketball strategy and defensive skill play a huge component.

We're trying to make it as close to real life as possible, and balance skill vs. strategy as best we can to give you guys the best experience possible.

Stick skills are being emphasized because this is a first for basketball games and should make playing the game more consistent and rewarding as a player. It is not meant to take away from the strategic elements of the game. It should in fact make them even more realistic and relevant.
 
# 18 neptuneniq @ 08/24/10 08:37 PM
dude kept talking about NHL, nobody cares
 
# 19 Jano @ 08/24/10 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neptuneniq
dude kept talking about NHL, nobody cares
Lol wow you obviously didn't read the interview. There was a reason he talked about that game..
 
# 20 Tha_Kid @ 08/24/10 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neptuneniq
dude kept talking about NHL, nobody cares
Quote:
We wanted this interview to focus on the differences between the rebuilds of NHL and Elite
The answers are going to reflect the questions. Read the thread.
 

« Previous123456Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.