Operation Sports Logo Header
Home
Operation Sports Logo Header
Madden NFL 17 News Post

Madden NFL 17 Team Ratings - NFC (Overall, Offense & Defense)

  12:14 PM - August 5, 2016 by jpdavis82

After releasing the Madden NFL 17 team ratings for the AFC teams yesterday, EA Sports have posted the Madden NFL 17 team ratings for the NFC teams today. They have included the overall team rating, as well as offensive and defensive team ratings.

Check them out below and post your thoughts!
  • Carolina Panthers - Overall 87 (Offense 91 - Defense 87)
  • Green Bay Packers - Overall 85 (Offense 89 - Defense 85)
  • Seattle Seahawks - Overall 85 (Offense 83 - Defense 89)
  • Arizona Cardinals - Overall 84 (Offense 91 - Defense 81)
  • Dallas Cowboys - Overall 84 (Offense 89 - Defense 83)
  • Atlanta Falcons - Overall 81 (Offense 89 - Defense 79)
  • Minnesota Vikings - Overall 81 (Offense 81 - Defense 87)
  • Detroit Lions - Overall 80 (Offense 81 - Defense 83)
  • New York Giants - Overall 80 (Offense 83 - Defense 83)
  • Philadelphia Eagles - Overall 80 (Offense 83 - Defense 83)
  • New Orleans Saints - Overall 80 (Offense 83 - Defense 79)
  • Washington Redskins - Overall 79 (Offense 83 - Defense 81)
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Overall 79 (Offense 83 - Defense 81)
  • Los Angeles Rams - Overall 78 (Offense 79 - Defense 81)
  • San Francisco 49ers - Overall 75 (Offense 75 - Defense 79)
  • Chicago Bears - Overall 74 (Offense 73 - Defense 77)

Game: Madden NFL 17Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 17 - View All
Member Comments
# 21 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
[emoji849] GB dominated the first game and took them lightly in the second game plus they weren't near the same team they will be this year. Rodgers will have another MVP season and GB will maybe lose 1-2 division games.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL Okay. If you say so.

Sounds like the Packers are at least splitting the series if not getting swept by the Vikings then.
 
# 22 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
LOL Okay. If you say so.



Sounds like the Packers are at least splitting the series if not getting swept by the Vikings then.


Please, GB will at worst split


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 23 J.Cole @ 08/05/16 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
Please, GB will at worst split


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Saving this for future reference.
 
# 24 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 12:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
Please, GB will at worst split


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not trying to hate, but I think you're way overrating GB.

I'd give the Packers the edge at QB, WR, OL, and Punter.

Vikings at RB, TE, DL, LB, and Coach.

They tie at DB and K.
 
# 25 underdog13 @ 08/05/16 12:54 PM
Lets get the NFC North rivalry talk started early this year!

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
# 26 solmon @ 08/05/16 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
Not trying to hate, but I think you're way overrating GB.

I'd give the Packers the edge at QB, WR, OL, and Punter.

Vikings at RB, TE, DL, LB, and Coach.

They tie at DB and K.
^ This post is tied for the most subjective post of 2016 lol
 
# 27 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by solmon
^ This post is tied for the most subjective post of 2016 lol
Please, tell me where I am wrong.
 
# 28 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
Not trying to hate, but I think you're way overrating GB.



I'd give the Packers the edge at QB, WR, OL, and Punter.



Vikings at RB, TE, DL, LB, and Coach.



They tie at DB and K.


GB has better DB and K and Coach


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 29 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
GB has better DB and K and Coach


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Coach I 100% disagree. He's underachieved with Rodgers.

Kicker - I would argue Walsh but I'm trying to be subjective. He had a better fg % last year and is 10th best all time.

DB - No. Vikings have the best one in Smith and quite a bit of depth in Rhodes, Captain, Newman, Waynes, Blanton, Sendejo, Griffin, Alexander, Kearse (he's going to be a stud). I do think Packers probably have the 2nd and 3rd best DB's, but Vikings have more depth imo.
 
# 30 jsteele14 @ 08/05/16 01:00 PM
No respect for the Redskins. Worse than the Eagles?? How do they figure that?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
# 31 kehlis @ 08/05/16 01:00 PM
Can you two take this to PM so everyone else can discuss all the other teams please.
 
# 32 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
Coach I 100% disagree. He's underachieved with Rodgers.



Kicker - I would argue Walsh but I'm trying to be subjective. He had a better fg % last year and is 10th best all time.



DB - No. Vikings have the best one in Smith and quite a bit of depth in Rhodes, Captain, Newman, Waynes, Blanton, Sendejo, Griffin, Alexander, Kearse (he's going to be a stud). I do think Packers probably have the 2nd and 3rd best DB's, but Vikings have more depth imo.


I'll take Shields over Rhodes and yes Smith is elite but I'll take our two Safeties combined over Vikings. We have a lot of young talent at CB, Randall is going to be a stud, Rollins isn't far behind.

BB and Brady went 10 years between SB victories, we will discuss this again in another five years and see how many more SB's GB has won by then. I like Zimmer but McCarthy has been around longer and GB has 7 straight years in the Playoffs, could have easily won it all 2 years ago and were a blown coverage by a rookie away from a real shot at going to the NFC championship last year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 33 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/05/16 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
Please, tell me where I am wrong.


I like the Bears LBs more than Minny no homer but only Barr the LB I'll take over a Bears LB
 
# 34 noplace @ 08/05/16 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsteele14
No respect for the Redskins. Worse than the Eagles?? How do they figure that?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I'm convinced ratings guy has a issue with the Skins. Outside of RB I'd put the Skins offense up against any team in the league talent wise. I'm ok with the defensive ratings until they prove otherwise. Thank god for edits because theres some serious shafting going on with alot of teams.

Another thing to note is that once cuts are made ratings will go up after releasing low grade players.
 
# 35 jfsolo @ 08/05/16 01:37 PM
Kane has basically admitted on Twitter that team ratings are created from some voodoo mathematical formula that can't really be explained. When you play through many CFM seasons this is readily apparent.
 
# 36 Gilley @ 08/05/16 01:43 PM
I usually don't care about ratings, but jeez, these are really strange.
 
# 37 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehlis
Can you two take this to PM so everyone else can discuss all the other teams please.
Sorry. I'll be done.
 
# 38 Birdman18 @ 08/05/16 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfsolo
Kane has basically admitted on Twitter that team ratings are created from some voodoo mathematical formula that can't really be explained. When you play through many CFM seasons this is readily apparent.


That shows you right there that they've built madden continuously on legacy code dating back probably to Madden 06 on 360. Which also is why I believe there's still so many legacy issues with the game that they haven't been able to fix.
 
# 39 underdog13 @ 08/05/16 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman18
That shows you right there that they've built madden continuously on legacy code dating back probably to Madden 06 on 360. Which also is why I believe there's still so many legacy issues with the game that they haven't been able to fix.
Heck I bet the ovr formula goes back to the ps2 days.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
# 40 Hova57 @ 08/05/16 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by noplace
I'm convinced ratings guy has a issue with the Skins. Outside of RB I'd put the Skins offense up against any team in the league talent wise. I'm ok with the defensive ratings until they prove otherwise. Thank god for edits because theres some serious shafting going on with alot of teams.

Another thing to note is that once cuts are made ratings will go up after releasing low grade players.
Lol our defense gives better rating..unknown at rb Te is the best position for you guys then tackle. Other than Norman who do you have on defense other than a group of guys historically injured.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.