Madden NFL 16 News Post

Madden NFL 16 NFC North Team Ratings, Along with a Few More Player Ratings

02:42 PM - August 8, 2015 by Steve_OS

EA Sports has released Madden NFL 16 team ratings for the NFC North today, along with a few more player ratings.

Green Bay Packers (90 OVR)

Offense

Aaron Rodgers (99 OVR)
Jordy Nelson (93 OVR)
Randall Cobb (91 OVR)
Eddie Lacy (90 OVR)
Josh Sitton (97 OVR)
T. J. Lang (92 OVR)

Defense

Clay Matthews (90 OVR)
Julius Peppers (88 OVR)
Casey Heyward (85 OVR)
Ha Ha Clinton-Dix (81 OVR)

Detroit Lions (83 OVR)

Offense

Matthew Stafford (84 OVR)
Joique Bell (80 OVR)
Calvin Johnson (95 OVR)
Golden Tate (88 OVR)

Defense

Haloti Ngata (92 OVR)
DeAndre Levy (93 OVR)
Glover Quin (90 OVR)
Stephen Tulloch (87 OVR)
Ezekiel Ansah (88 OVR)

Minnesota Vikings (77 OVR)

Offense

Adrian Peterson (95 OVR)
Mike Wallace (86 OVR)
Cordarrelle Patterson (73 OVR/90 SPD)
Teddy Bridgewater (82 OVR)

Defense

Harrison Smith (93 OVR)
Xavier Rhodes (86 OVR)
Robert Blanton (86 OVR)
Everson Griffen (89 OVR)
Sharrif Floyd (87 OVR)

Chicago Bears (75 OVR)

Offense

Jay Cutler (79 OVR)
Martellus Bennett (90 OVR)
Alshon Jeffery (90 OVR)
Kevin White (78 OVR)
Matt Forte (90 OVR)

Defense

Pernell McPhee (87 OVR)
Jared Allen (79 OVR)
Kyle Fuller (78 OVR)
Jon Bostic (75 OVR)

Previously released Madden NFL 16 player ratings:

Game: Madden NFL 16Reader Score: 7/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 24 - View All

Madden NFL 16 Videos

Member Comments

# 21 grodbetatted @ 08/08/15 08:20 PM

by the end of the season the vikings will win the division its cool, they they have them number 3 for now. It won't last long

# 22 The JareBear @ 08/08/15 08:22 PM

I really think the Vikings are gonna be one of the best Madden Teams this year. Lot of upside

# 23 D13 @ 08/08/15 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	by the end of the season the vikings will win the division its cool, they they have them number 3 for now. It won't last long

Nobody's beat Green Bay in 7 years. Let's step away from the ledge and be reasonable.

# 24 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/08/15 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redsox4evur


	Cool he is a fan favorite. I don't care about Pro Bowl Voting because it's a popularity contest and most of the best players don't play in the game. Hell 2 of the top QBs, FSs, CBs, and the top SS, TE in the game didn't make the game last year.

Bennett had 90 catches for 916 yards and 6 Tds last year , he's also a good blocking TE . 5 TEs got rated higher than him this year , he's def a top 8 TE and deserve this rating or at least a point or 2 lower .

# 25 grodbetatted @ 08/09/15 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D13


	Nobody's beat Green Bay in 7 years. Let's step away from the ledge and be reasonable.

last time we had a decent QB, we swept greenbay... Now we have a decent QB again and more offensive fire power we will be ok.. that was less than 7 years ago... that was 2009-2010 season and the year before that we won the Division at 10-6

# 26 Godgers12 @ 08/09/15 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	last time we had a decent QB, we swept greenbay... Now we have a decent QB again and more offensive fire power we will be ok.. that was less than 7 years ago... that was 2009-2010 season and the year before that we won the Division at 10-6

Except the Packers have one of the best QBs ever in his prime and a much better supporting cast.

# 27 ClayCuckolds @ 08/09/15 03:32 AM

vikes win division this year.

# 28 Birdman18 @ 08/09/15 09:38 AM

Pernell McPhee was the 2nd highest rated OLB in a 3-4 last year.. Limited snaps, yes.. But dude is a beast

www.techraptor.net

# 29 jmallymav @ 08/09/15 10:29 AM

Cordelle Patterson's a 73? Somebody please help me understand that?

# 30 grodbetatted @ 08/09/15 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmallymav


	Cordelle Patterson's a 73? Somebody please help me understand that?

cordarrelle patterson had a subpar season last year thats why... he may not even be a starting receiver this year unless he can learn to run routes better... hes still explosive tho.

# 31 grodbetatted @ 08/09/15 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godgers12


	Except the Packers have one of the best QBs ever in his prime and a much better supporting cast.

We have the best back in the league and 1 of the fastest receiving cores in the nfl and a better tightend then GB, not to mention our defense is waaaaaaaay better than GB, and the last time we swept them Aaron Rogers was the QB

# 32 roadman @ 08/09/15 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	We have the best back in the league and 1 of the fastest receiving cores in the nfl and a better tightend then GB, not to mention our defense is waaaaaaaay better than GB, and the last time we swept them Aaron Rogers was the QB

Just hope that OL, which ranked at the bottom of the league, holds up for Bridgewater and Peterson.

# 33 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/09/15 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmallymav


	Cordelle Patterson's a 73? Somebody please help me understand that?

He sucks - NFL players

# 34 Godgers12 @ 08/09/15 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	We have the best back in the league and 1 of the fastest receiving cores in the nfl and a better tightend then GB, not to mention our defense is waaaaaaaay better than GB, and the last time we swept them Aaron Rogers was the QB

Please stop. Packers have probably 3 WRs better than anyone the Vikings have, a HB who isn't about to decline and a much much much better OL. Not to mention your D isn't much better if at all. And the last time you swept us Favre was your QB. So you needed an exiled Packer playing QB just to beat us lol.

# 35 grodbetatted @ 08/09/15 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Godgers12


	Please stop. Packers have probably 3 WRs better than anyone the Vikings have a HB who isn't about to decline and a much much much better OL. Not to mention your D isn't much better if at all. And the last time you swept us Favre was your QB. So you needed an exiled Packer playing QB just to beat us lol.

Peterson isn't on a decline not even close... and we are poised to have a top 10 defense this year... you must've forgotten that your O-Line isnt that good either i remember aaron rogers sitting on his butt a few times last year. Honestly your receivers arent as good as they think, if they played for another team they wouldnt be nearly as good. So again out defense is waaaay better than yours, the only thing you have is a high powered offense, defense is subpar at best. Clay matthews oh ok cool... Our OL was hurt last year, remember we have the same O-line we had when peterson rushed for over 2000 yds and they are healthy now

# 36 roadman @ 08/09/15 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	Peterson isn't on a decline not even close... and we are poised to have a top 10 defense this year... you must've forgotten that your O-Line isnt that good either i remember aaron rogers sitting on his butt a few times last year. Honestly your receivers arent as good as they think, if they played for another team they wouldnt be nearly as good. So again out defense is waaaay better than yours, the only thing you have is a high powered offense, defense is subpar at best. Clay matthews oh ok cool... Our OL was hurt last year, remember we have the same O-line we had when peterson rushed for over 2000 yds and they are healthy now

Now you are reaching big time.

Our OL isn't that good? Josh Sitton is an all-pro. Rodgers is on his butt because he holds onto the ball too long sometimes to make a play, not because of the OL. Last year, the team gave up 30 sacks, 2013 45 sacks. Yeah, that OL didn't improve or isn't very good.

# 37 Godgers12 @ 08/09/15 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	Peterson isn't on a decline not even close... and we are poised to have a top 10 defense this year... you must've forgotten that your O-Line isnt that good either i remember aaron rogers sitting on his butt a few times last year. Honestly your receivers arent as good as they think, if they played for another team they wouldnt be nearly as good. So again out defense is waaaay better than yours, the only thing you have is a high powered offense, defense is subpar at best. Clay matthews oh ok cool... Our OL was hurt last year, remember we have the same O-line we had when peterson rushed for over 2000 yds and they are healthy now

Packers have a top 3 OL in the NFL bud.

# 38 grodbetatted @ 08/09/15 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadman


	Now you are reaching big time. Our OL isn't that good? Josh Sitton is an all-pro. Rodgers is on his butt because he holds onto the ball too long sometimes to make a play, not because of the OL. Last year, the team gave up 30 sacks, 2013 45 sacks. Yeah, that OL didn't improve or isn't very good.

didnt say they didnt improve, but they arent that good at all... rogers takes sacks period, but your boy just said blasphemy. he said peterson is on a decline, he is the best for a reason. He isn't on a decline and the packers know that first hand. he puts on a show everytime we play them

# 39 roadman @ 08/09/15 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grodbetatted


	didnt say they didnt improve, but they arent that good at all... rogers takes sacks period, but your boy just said blasphemy. he said peterson is on a decline, he is the best for a reason. He isn't on a decline and the packers know that first hand. he puts on a show everytime we play them

You are still reaching when you state the Packers OL isn't that good at all. That means they are below mediocre and they are well above that. Not sure why you keep down playing the line with two all-pro guards, a great center and two good tackles.

Peterson hasn't played vs Matthews in the middle, either.

The Packers run D was improved over the last 9 games when Matthews moved inside.

That is a fact.

Yes, Peterson, is a beast and has been a beast vs the Packers, let's wait and see on the gridiron before declaring the trend will continue with Peterson vs the Packers.

Edit- Now, I see why you are reaching on the OL, because one Packer fan said Peterson is on the decline. I'm not ready to dig the shovel on Peterson, yet, I'll wait to see how he performs with a year off and if he can stay healthy.

# 40 Godgers12 @ 08/09/15 04:00 PM

I never said AP was on a decline . Believe what I said was s9nn to be decline.

« Previous 123 4 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 16 NFC North Team Ratings, Along with a Few More Player Ratings