Home
News Post


By now you've heard the news on Clippers owner Donald Sterling.

Banned from the NBA for life? Check. Fined the maximum $2.5 million? Check. Forced to sell the team? Possibly in the works.

In dropping the ban-hammer, NBA commissioner Adam Silver suggested he would seek a forced sale of the team from Sterling's hands due to racist comments by the current Clippers owner. It's hard to imagine an individual who would want to simply own a franchise without being allowed involvement in league or team activities, but can the league force someone to sell their property?

In the United States there are many constitutional and legal protections like free speech which also includes an implied right to say stupid things as well. If a stubborn Donald Sterling refuses to remove himself from an awkward situation, there may not be much more the NBA can do.

Sound Off: Should the NBA be allowed to "force" Donald Sterling to sell the Los Angeles Clippers?

Sports Headlines for Month 1, 2014

Game: NBAReader Score: 9/10 - Vote Now
Platform: SportsVotes for game: 2 - View All
Member Comments
# 21 23 @ 05/01/14 10:40 AM
Owning a team in the NBA is a privilege not a right so yeah once you start damaging the business you're on the way out one way or another.

Galaxy Note 2
 
# 22 da ThRONe @ 05/01/14 11:20 AM
Since they legally have the right to do so I guess that means the answer is yes. I struggle with it because I'm not a person who feels that legal and right are mutually exclusive.


Taking my humane hat off and putting my business hat on* They have to get away from Sterling. Sterling is toxic and his association with the NBA(or any other business) would hurt the league financial. Those owners will vote him out because of self-interest. This precedence is not something they want to set, but it's the overwhelming lesser of the two evils to their long and short term profits.
 
# 23 LowerWolf @ 05/01/14 11:25 AM
Sterling has a right to be a bigoted idiot. The NBA has a right to not have bigoted idiots in its league.
 
# 24 aholbert32 @ 05/01/14 11:30 AM
locked...no political/race discussion in OS forums.
 
# 25 da ThRONe @ 05/01/14 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEFAULTCAMERA
To answer the question no he should not be forced to sell his team if he does not want to. The real question here is why was Chris Paul, Doc Rivers and the rest of the team not upset before they signed with the team? They're saying he had a prior history of racist actions before this tape came out why did all these players go there. Where was all this outrage for Mr. Sterling back in October when the season started if they knew he was such a bad guy already. Everyone is just jumping on the bandwagon right now because it seems like the cool thing to do. When in reality they're missing the whole point of what he was saying.


The last person I want to defend is Chris Paul after he decided my team wasn't "good enough" for him. However there's a difference between he said she said evidence and hearing it from the horse's mouth.


I'm sure Sterling never said those things to his players. It's not like Sterling said these things out in public. These were his private conversations being recorded. And again all his racial history while documented were never things he said in public. I would rather judge a person by the one I meet rather than the one people tell me about.
 

« Previous 12Next »

Post A Comment
This thread has been closed for new comments.