now don't get mad just because I said you're ratings are a little biased, I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking that
sorry my ratings aren't based around how fast each QB is or their ball carrying,
I hate to be the one who breaks this to you but a QB's speed and BC rating play into their OVR rating. That's great they don't for you, but they do for the game.
I hate to be the one who breaks this to you but a QB's speed and BC rating play into their OVR rating. That's great they don't for you, but they do for the game.
take into account my whole post, not just part of it.. What I was trying to say was that the guy has Miller rated higher than some of the better passers in the country and I believe it to be because Miller can scramble better than they can.. or that he was biased, which he claimed not to be
I think the ratings play more towards how good of an athlete players are rather than how well they can play a position
DAT and McCarron definitely seem to be the two most overrated players. I'm surprised people haven't said more about Thomas. He didn't even make 2nd team all-conference last year and he's rated as high as the Heisman trophy and Biletnikoff winners? That's a huge projection from Thomas and I think he'll have a pretty decent year.
I think it's hard to justify those two though when neither are even the best players on their team. That was easily Marcus Mariota (who's a 90??) and CJ Mosley for the Ducks and Tide respectively. I just wish EA would use more objective things to at least get the top players right. Forgiveness can be given for the middle of the pack guys, but how do mess up the top guys? All they have to do is look at the All-American team and All-conference teams. They really can't just get the top 20 guys right?