Madden NFL 13 News Post

Clint Oldenburg Explains the Strength Rating For Linemen in Madden

03:10 PM - January 4, 2013 by ABR173rd

EA Sports Designer, Clint Oldenburg has explained the strength rating for lineman in Madden, which includes a detailed look at how players strength ratings are determined and how gamers see it in-game.

Quote:


	For the linemen, STR is a match-up between a blocker and a defender who are engaged with each other. If the disparity is largely in the blocker's favor, he will be able to hold his block for a longer-than-average amount of time based on the size of the disparity (not every time). If the STR rating matchup is in favor of the defender, he will be able to disengage from the block much quicker than normal on average (again, not every time). And if the two players have similar STR ratings, you'll see varied results in wins and losses over the course of game, but neither will dominate in this one specific area.

Make sure you give it a read, plenty of good details inside.

Source - Madden Strength Rating for Linemen (SOTL)

Game: Madden NFL 13Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii U / Xbox 360Votes for game: 77 - View All

Madden NFL 13 Videos

Member Comments

# 41 Phobia @ 01/07/13 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingV2k3


	BINGO! I've been following this thread with great interest, because frankly I'm kind of amazed that some of the "best and brightest" on this forum are operating under the assumption that the developers "intentions" are in line with the "result" for the end user... What the rating team "intend" to have happen will ALSO, ultimately, be affected by the guys who develop the gameplay... The gameplay guys have there own set of "intentions" that are also subject to end "results" that are unintended consequences of layered code... As my LT / RT example illustrates, the ratings team isn't even aware of the "age old" mess that the gameplay guys created, which makes the OL / DL position assignments "backwards"... There's been a lot of desire to get "confirmation" on everything from ratings to gameplay over the past couple years and: 1) (Based on the past decade plus) That's NOT likely to happen 2) Because: They don't KNOW how all of this stuff actually / really / really works... The various departments DO know what THEY (seemingly alone) "intend", but once again, that's a far cry from the actual / on filed end result... Every once in a great while, a "chestnut" like this blog pop up and folks hang on every word, but to me, it just confirms the disconnect between "intention" and result"... Now, how about something they CAN affect...like that RT / LT mess, that should be an easy, attainable fix... By coordinating the "intentions / results" of BOTH the ratings AND gameplay departments...and then they can let the commentary guys know that they're FINALLY on the same page...

FANTASTIC post King!!!

A decade of layered code on top of code has rendered the gameplay & rating connection to be by far the biggest head scratching debacle.

Instead what we see each year is a "section" of code rewritten or modified to get new intended results, like the passing changes of this year. Because of how much layered code has been compounded on top one another going in and simply fixing how the ratings interact with the gameplay is a massive undertaking.

Honestly how the ratings interact with one another need to be greatly simplified. It should not take a degree from MIT to breakdown the logic of the ratings. Plus the interactions with the ratings is so interwoven if makes for a mess of randomness.

A simple explanation of what I mean is this.

Strength should mean just that pure strength. So a 350 pound offensive lineman with a 90 strength should completely man handle a 160 pound CB play in and play out. Just powering him back. Where the CB can turn the tides is his speed to get around him before the lineman can get a hand on him. Instead what we get is a 350lb lineman standing up patty caking a 160lb CB as if they hand fighting.

Quit making our NFL players into girly man-women.

Now where things get really complicated for the user is when you got to assess all these ratings together. Ok so he is a 80 awareness, 75 pass block, ohhhh but he is a 93 run block so he is a run blocker, but wait he is only a 79 in strength so he is weak, oh but wait he is a 90 in impact block so he must do something good right??? Then you are not only comparing all these different intangibles to how they apply in the game yet you are trying to decipher this among hundreds of players and who to start, who to draft, etc.

Strength should be just that, speed should be just that, pass block skill should be just that, block shed skill should correlate against their block skill, and on and on. Yet even with all this comparison it should be in a easy form to look at and process. Showing a DT ratings then see everything from his throw power to his kick accuracy is just flat out DUMB and wasted time and space for the user to see how the player "SHOULD" perform.

I personally think ratings are hard to turn into "on-field" actions and it appear realistic. Real players are not rated, it is speed, power, agility, and mental ability against one another. Of course you have the specific abilities such as throw strength and accuracy but most players are not defined in this manner.

A 6'2" big CB such as Browner with the Seahawks naturally has a better time being physical and jamming WRs because of his physical size. Yet in madden this has to be accomplished by adjusting 6 or so ratings just to "appear" as if it will affect how he players like this. His natural WEIGHT and STRENGTH should dictate how he will battle a WR against their WEIGHT and STRENGTH. Then once the jam is finished his SPEED, AGILITY, ACCELERATION, and AWARENESS should dictate how well he can cover the corner versus his same physical and mental skill set.

My point is that all these ratings confuse things and do not reflect how players play naturally on the field. About the only rating I can see differently as a "subjective rating" would be something like "play maker" and have it give bonuses to the other abilities to mimic guys who are just naturally that superstar ability or that "IT factor" we hear about, someone like Polamalu, Suggs, Manning, etc. Isn't this how real players are challenged against one another?

# 42 LBzrule @ 01/07/13 07:23 PM

And Phobia, I would like to add, if I have a player with a specific trait, he should be performing with it WITHOUT me controlling him. I did a test on this last night with Haloti Ngata. I performed the Bull Rush several times when I controlled him. When I left him in the hands of the A.I. and controlled Ed Reed, Ellerbe or Lewis, he did NOTHING

# 43 Phobia @ 01/07/13 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LBzrule


	And Phobia, I would like to add, if I have a player with a specific trait, he should be performing with it WITHOUT me controlling him. I did a test on this last night with Haloti Ngata. I performed the Bull Rush several times when I controlled him. When I left him in the hands of the A.I. and controlled Ed Reed, Ellerbe or Lewis, he did NOTHING

I know LB it is just frustrating on so many levels.

# 44 Phobia @ 01/07/13 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big FN Deal


	This in the sad truth. While I appreciate all the deep thoughtful discussion that goes on around OS about Madden, the game completely overlooks so many basic elements. The depth of ratings aside, it absurd that the AI doesn't perform adequately to its' real life counter parts. In last gen football games I had a saying "I don't User control Pro Bowlers" because it made sense that the AI for those players should be better than me. However with Madden this gen, stars don't play like stars controlled by the AI and the game just has very little rhyme or reason behind it. So many things in Madden at this point come across as gimmicks with very little substance to them. There is simply no excuse for Madden be such a poor representation of NFL football.

Big it stems from the fact a realistic direction was not taken from the creation of the code. Now they are trying to go back and attempt to fix poor code decisions. The problem that is like building a house with untreated wood. When it starts to rot and decay you cover it with paint instead of doing it right the first time by using the right building materials.

My point is now there is no way to really make this code work in way you would like to see. As painful as it is and how much they don't want to do it but a entire new game needs to be built from the ground up with strictly the mind set of competing with the top dog franchises like The Show and NBA 2k in the realism department. This current engine and design I just don't see if ever being able to do that.

# 45 at23steelers @ 01/07/13 10:20 PM

The more I think about this thread and what Phobia is saying, wouldn't the smartest thing to do is announce this year they will add Madden 2014 rosters for $10. However, the annual Madden won't come out since it will give them more time on next gen games. That way it won't turn out like previous gen conversion. That way, they don't play with bad code of this gen and have full 2 years to work on next gen game!! Prove to us this game is on level of other EA sports games. But who knows, nothing they do is ever logical!

# 46 simfballcritic @ 01/07/13 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia


	Big it stems from the fact a realistic direction was not taken from the creation of the code. Now they are trying to go back and attempt to fix poor code decisions. The problem that is like building a house with untreated wood. When it starts to rot and decay you cover it with paint instead of doing it right the first time by using the right building materials. My point is now there is no way to really make this code work in way you would like to see. As painful as it is and how much they don't want to do it but a entire new game needs to be built from the ground up with strictly the mind set of competing with the top dog franchises like The Show and NBA 2k in the realism department. This current engine and design I just don't see if ever being able to do that.

What up Phobia,

I agree with you 100%. At some point they will have to re-write codes in order for the game to perform in a way that us sim heads would like it to. In my talks with the Devs I know they are focusing on simulation, but like you said they must do what is necessary to achieve that goal.

# 47 Phobia @ 01/07/13 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simfballcritic


	What up Phobia, I agree with you 100%. At some point they will have to re-write codes in order for the game to perform in a way that us sim heads would like it to. In my talks with the Devs I know they are focusing on simulation, but like you said they must do what is necessary to achieve that goal.

Whats good Sim! I know we on the same level! Get at me when you get a chance, need to get my number from Smitty and holla at me.

# 48 RandyBass @ 01/07/13 11:36 PM

Making player ratings meaningful would go a long ways with this game. Add in a greater variety of animations and player models to match those ratings and you would have yourself a nice foundation, with players being well distinguished from one another. Top it off with some well coded AI that had those players playing to their ability, and you'd have a game that would absolutely capture people's attention.

Is that... Too much to ask?

# 49 splff3000 @ 01/08/13 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia


	FANTASTIC post King!!! A decade of layered code on top of code has rendered the gameplay & rating connection to be by far the biggest head scratching debacle. Instead what we see each year is a "section" of code rewritten or modified to get new intended results, like the passing changes of this year. Because of how much layered code has been compounded on top one another going in and simply fixing how the ratings interact with the gameplay is a massive undertaking. Honestly how the ratings interact with one another need to be greatly simplified. It should not take a degree from MIT to breakdown the logic of the ratings. Plus the interactions with the ratings is so interwoven if makes for a mess of randomness. A simple explanation of what I mean is this. Strength should mean just that pure strength. So a 350 pound offensive lineman with a 90 strength should completely man handle a 160 pound CB play in and play out. Just powering him back. Where the CB can turn the tides is his speed to get around him before the lineman can get a hand on him. Instead what we get is a 350lb lineman standing up patty caking a 160lb CB as if they hand fighting. Quit making our NFL players into girly man-women. Now where things get really complicated for the user is when you got to assess all these ratings together. Ok so he is a 80 awareness, 75 pass block, ohhhh but he is a 93 run block so he is a run blocker, but wait he is only a 79 in strength so he is weak, oh but wait he is a 90 in impact block so he must do something good right??? Then you are not only comparing all these different intangibles to how they apply in the game yet you are trying to decipher this among hundreds of players and who to start, who to draft, etc. Strength should be just that, speed should be just that, pass block skill should be just that, block shed skill should correlate against their block skill, and on and on. Yet even with all this comparison it should be in a easy form to look at and process. Showing a DT ratings then see everything from his throw power to his kick accuracy is just flat out DUMB and wasted time and space for the user to see how the player "SHOULD" perform. I personally think ratings are hard to turn into "on-field" actions and it appear realistic. Real players are not rated, it is speed, power, agility, and mental ability against one another. Of course you have the specific abilities such as throw strength and accuracy but most players are not defined in this manner. A 6'2" big CB such as Browner with the Seahawks naturally has a better time being physical and jamming WRs because of his physical size. Yet in madden this has to be accomplished by adjusting 6 or so ratings just to "appear" as if it will affect how he players like this. His natural WEIGHT and STRENGTH should dictate how he will battle a WR against their WEIGHT and STRENGTH. Then once the jam is finished his SPEED, AGILITY, ACCELERATION, and AWARENESS should dictate how well he can cover the corner versus his same physical and mental skill set. My point is that all these ratings confuse things and do not reflect how players play naturally on the field. About the only rating I can see differently as a "subjective rating" would be something like "play maker" and have it give bonuses to the other abilities to mimic guys who are just naturally that superstar ability or that "IT factor" we hear about, someone like Polamalu, Suggs, Manning, etc. Isn't this how real players are challenged against one another?

Excellent excellent post!!!! I have felt this way for years.

# 50 at23steelers @ 01/08/13 12:23 AM

That hand-fighting imitation is pure gold!!! Epic post!!

# 51 Phobia @ 01/08/13 12:59 AM

Thanks guys.

Next thing we need to discuss is player movement and how it should "feel". We all know currently that the running feels twitchy and far from realistic. It is literally the most important feature in the game. It makes up 100% of the game every single play.

One of my biggest pet peeves with the game is how defenders literally mimic the ball carrier. If you weave or aka twitch your way up field, watching the defenders mimic the movement EXACTLY at the same moment is terrible and greatly highlights how bad we need weight affect momentum and change of direction then tie that into awareness how fast a defender can "react" to those change in directions. Bottom line they should not mimic they runner like we are playing old school tecmo bowl.

Sent from da lil phone.

# 52 KBLover @ 01/08/13 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LBzrule


	If the bolded is the case then how do you explain a 92 STR offensive tackle not holding a block for at least 1 second on a 65 STR CB? It doesn't compute. I do think there are some MAGIC plays in Madden that overshoot ratings which takes us back to Madden 10. That year everyone ran Strong Close out of their minds because the personnel did not matter on Off Tackle and the Toss. Those two plays dominated Madden 10 no matter which defender was there and no matter the TE. The case is clearly evident when you move out of that formation. In Madden 10 line up in a basic I form and watch the OLB always destroy the TE and stop the run in the backfield. EVERY PLAY. But then in strong close the OLB/DE is nowhere to be found.

Plays do influence the AI, absolutely, and it does mess up ratings/abilities.

I think it might be why PRC is "the most important" defensive rating, because it can break the player out of this influence.

It goes back to the 'forced' nature of things to an extent. Some plays probably 'force' a certain start, which can disregard ratings. Some players (those with high PRC?) might not "go with the script" and they can blow up the whole play.

I think sliders mess with this, too. It can cause some "starts" to completely screw up, or it can make it go off without a hitch every time. That's part of why it can be hard to find a good balance. What you see might be because the team isn't running any of these kinds of plays...but the next time, the next team has a lot of them, and I wonder why Ray Lewis can get 15 tackles one game, then 4 the next - even replaying the same team.

# 53 KBLover @ 01/08/13 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia


	Now where things get really complicated for the user is when you got to assess all these ratings together. Ok so he is a 80 awareness, 75 pass block, ohhhh but he is a 93 run block so he is a run blocker, but wait he is only a 79 in strength so he is weak, oh but wait he is a 90 in impact block so he must do something good right??? Then you are not only comparing all these different intangibles to how they apply in the game yet you are trying to decipher this among hundreds of players and who to start, who to draft, etc.

I'd interpret that as he's not going to push Wilfork around and will need help (low STR for an OL), and heaven help him against a bull rush from Wilfork (low STR, low PBK, Wilfork is a monster). With that IBL, though, I'd want to get him on the edge so he can run over some poor CB or something.

Personally, I have no problem with this. I wish DBs were rated on how they handle individual routes - more situational separation of ability, the better, imo. To me, the problem isn't that there's too many ratings, it's that the game doesn't consider them at all times (the 'magic play' type thing LB was talking about, among other things like fundamental football intelligence in the players, etc.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia


	I personally think ratings are hard to turn into "on-field" actions and it appear realistic. Real players are not rated, it is speed, power, agility, and mental ability against one another. Of course you have the specific abilities such as throw strength and accuracy but most players are not defined in this manner.

They aren't "rated" against each other, but if Ngata is trying to blow up a run play, his speed, power, agility, instincts, etc are going to determine how well he'll do. He has a certain level of these things. These are better or worse than other players. That can't be thrown out, imo. In computer games, that's ratings.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia


	A 6'2" big CB such as Browner with the Seahawks naturally has a better time being physical and jamming WRs because of his physical size. Yet in madden this has to be accomplished by adjusting 6 or so ratings just to "appear" as if it will affect how he players like this. His natural WEIGHT and STRENGTH should dictate how he will battle a WR against their WEIGHT and STRENGTH. Then once the jam is finished his SPEED, AGILITY, ACCELERATION, and AWARENESS should dictate how well he can cover the corner versus his same physical and mental skill set.

A strong corner doesn't mean he can use press coverage. It would help him if his technique is correct, just like being fast enough to run with any WR is a big help going up against a blazing fast WR, but it's not enough alone.

There is always a technique difference among players. It shouldn't just be "I have high strength, so I should always jam the receiver."

Physical ability should, of course, be a significant factor. All the technique in the world can't help a guy if he's too physically overmatched. It just shouldn't be the sole determining factor.

IMO:

Physical ratings = what physical prowess/abilities you have.
Mental ratings = how you read the field/what's happening
Technique ratings = how well you use what you have to do what you want to do.

To me, all three of these areas are at work in football. A player can have good physical ability, read the wrong thing, and do that wrong thing very well...to no positive effect. Some players can do the right thing with lesser physical skill, but do it SO WELL that it doesn't matter.

I'm not saying Madden "needs" all the ratings it has, but if ratings are going to get dropped/condensed, how are these areas going to be reflected realistically?

I still hold the thought that the number of ratings is not the problem. It's the game's use (or non-use) of them in various situations, the lack of physical considerations (i.e. the STR thing not helping push/overpower, just "hold") and overall player AI.

# 54 LBzrule @ 01/08/13 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KBLover


	Plays do influence the AI, absolutely, and it does mess up ratings/abilities. I think it might be why PRC is "the most important" defensive rating, because it can break the player out of this influence. It goes back to the 'forced' nature of things to an extent. Some plays probably 'force' a certain start, which can disregard ratings. Some players (those with high PRC?) might not "go with the script" and they can blow up the whole play. I think sliders mess with this, too. It can cause some "starts" to completely screw up, or it can make it go off without a hitch every time. That's part of why it can be hard to find a good balance. What you see might be because the team isn't running any of these kinds of plays...but the next time, the next team has a lot of them, and I wonder why Ray Lewis can get 15 tackles one game, then 4 the next - even replaying the same team.

By plays having MAGIC in them and overruling the ratings I'm actually referring to what's wrong with the game. When you look back at the short history of Strong Close, it did not matter what the defenders play recognition was, nobody was going to stop it. I remember vividly on this board Ian showing game play of the titans vs the Ravens and over and over again he ran Fk FB Dive HB Toss to CJ and getting major yards and I interjected, if Lewis and Reed have 99 PRC why does this keep happening? How are they getting fooled by the SAME play. Dig that thread up. I cannot remember what the response was at that point. It has nothing to do with ratings and everything to do with no football fundamentals being programmed into the game; and them always adding things on offense that the defense cannot stop or has to go head over heels trying to stop; and its still breaking away from that Tecmo Bowl perfect play match so my defense destroys your offense mentality.

I think you are giving them too much credit with the PRC rating in this regard. There offenses in the game that it doesn't matter what your defenders ratings are, the offensive formations put the defenders way out of position. Another formation that people have heavily abused over the last three years Snugs and Gun Snugs. It's because the defenders do not respond well to routes and runs out of it. So you have to make shift/micromanage a defense and take guys from doing what they do best to defend it. Another two year are Ace Close and Ace Pair Flex. You basically have to run 2 man rush/1 man rush F@G defense to deal with these formations. You certainly cannot stay with your basic rush defenses. They will get eaten alive with the quick passing and other routes from these formations. From what I recall you do not play online so this is something that you would not be aware of. Trust me it is a BIG OLE MESS when it comes to these things.

# 55 simfballcritic @ 01/08/13 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia


	Whats good Sim! I know we on the same level! Get at me when you get a chance, need to get my number from Smitty and holla at me.

No doubt man!

# 56 Phobia @ 01/09/13 12:05 AM

I agree with you on several aspects and disagree with you also on others KB. For instance I agree there is some "technique" associated with playing the game but where I disagree is this being represented in a rating.

I fully believe players should be designed to work from the same standards players do in real life.

Physical
- How fast can he run
- How long to get to top speed from a stop
- How strong is his upper body
- How strong is his lower body
- How much does he weight
- How tall is he
- How much agility does he have
-

Mental
- How is his football IQ (seeing things happen before they do)
- How prone is he to making mistakes (committing penalties, missing blitz pick ups, forgetting his coverage, etc)
- How prone is he to off field mistakes (missing practice, getting in legal trouble, making bad decisions)
- How good is he at prereading plays (don't think in madden terms, think bigger. Like Ed Reed studying the steelers and their tendencies. Then seeing a play he knows is coming and jumping the route.

Difference makers
- How prone is he to taking off a play (not running full speed or taking part in entire play)
- How much leadership does he bring (boost players drive and awareness)

Etc etc etc

You get the gist of it. I believe physical measures should dictate how a player plays. Then boosts, abilities, characteristics, whatever you want to call them change and separate how each other functions.

I feel the entire rating system leads to subjectiveness and is why the game has such a split personality and does not represent players like their real life counter parts.

For the sake of example APF ability system made players feel different. Nba 2k13 has also gone this route and it has helped to a extent.

Maddens current route there is not that separation between players. I think a decade of using ratings has proved this needs to be updated with a new direction. In that decade span it has never worked were players feel like they are different "supposed" people. Instead it is another jersey with a different number and little difference.

New ideas, new ways to approach the short comings need to be discussed. INNOVATION needs to shine through again!!!!

Sent from da lil phone.

# 57 SamoanSteelerFromAus @ 01/09/13 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big FN Deal


	Exactly, most of the game is a convoluted mess, imo. Not to bash too much but after not playing M13 for quite sometime or any video games, I was watching my gf's son playing NBA2k13 a few days ago. When it went to the Halftime Show/Report, I instantly just shook my head thinking of Madden again. EA Tiburion has taken creating a solid NFL video game and made it out to be some unreachable goal. Making sports simulation video games is not rocket science considering other companies are and have done it. They actually refer to Donny Moore as the "ratings czar" but if I were him I would be ashamed to be associated with the rating system in Madden. Real talk, everybody is not cut out to do everything and it seems many people working on Madden, aren't cut out to make a NFL video game. That said, I don't wish anyone out of a job and Lord knows I had to "fake it til I make it" before at jobs, so I understand. However, I hope the new consoles bring a better Madden and ultimately an end to the NFL exclusive license because I miss having a NFL video game that makes sense, which I can enjoy.

This happened to me. I've played football games all my life and sometimes the odd basketball game. Bought M13 and thought it was garbage for the many reasons you have already pointed out on this site.

Gave NBA2K13 a go and now I don't even know where my M13 copy is haha i think it's at someones house but I couldnt care less cause there is NO WAY i can go back to playing madden after playing 2K13.

The halftime show, the breaks at the quarters, the replays, the commentary, the stat overlays during the game, the all round presentation...EVERYTHING is done better by 2K and that's not even mentioning the gameplay.. Madden doesnt hold a candle to 2K and I am a much much bigger football fan than nba yet i have logged many hours into the my player mode which is how an "rpg type" sports mode should be and they didn't need to rave about their twitter feed cause obviously they had much more going then a scripted gimmick that EA hide their deficiencies behind.
The signature skills in 2K are brilliant. so many good ideas added every year.

Playing NBA isnt always a delight though, a lot of the times while i play I get depressed because I ponder how good an nfl game could be if Take 2 had a shot haha.

Madden should stop with trying to explain ratings because they are heavily flawed and animations have more of an impact in the game...animations that are very inferior to other sport games on this gen.
Scratch the engine and start a new or give up the license, its the only way we will get an adequate football game.

I play american football for real in Australia and nothing in madden immerses me in any type of realism or simulation i experience on the field. Nba 2K13 sends me to the local court to practice post moves because they are executed so well in that game, nuff said.

# 58 hanzsomehanz @ 01/09/13 02:08 AM

Phobia's last comment on physics and mass representation as well as the ai abuse that lbz expounded on were basically the topics I was going to drill into but they said it well... if you play online, especially MUT where you can experience the best of the best (ratings wise) - you will see how abusive some of these players can be - abusive in the sense that they literally abuse the ai gimmicks.. it really demoralizes the integrity of the game. I'm not a fan of the 2k football experience but it did have it's perks. I never did hear about that community complaining about AI abuse but that is a prevalent topic amongst the madden community.

About the ratings and blocking specifically.. I would have to say I am not pro-EA RAatings.. Using the blocking schematics for instance, there is so much crammed into blocking:

1 Run/Pass Block
2 Run/Pass Block Footwork
3 Run/Pass Block Strength
4 Impact Block
5 Strength
6 Speed
7 Acceleration
8. False Start
9. Off Sides
10. Holding
* Wildcard / X-Factor - Mass

Phobia touched on this and I just wanted to elaborate that they do need the physics of mass and momentum to be accessible and tweaked so we can know for sure how mass is being played out in the game. Until that becomes a factor we are really settling for dust..

As it stands right now, you have a package of potential in your ability tab as well as a hidden talent in your penalty tab. Re: the blocking schematics, if you wanted to emphasize impact - you would give one side of the trenches an edge - say 35 false start vs 15 off sides because these two penalties basically control the trench fight. Now at 50:50 you get a standstill - where anything is 50/50 you get a standstilll. Not because it is 50:50 but because of how the ratings and effacy of ratings are weighed.

It is this weighing and balancing of the metrics that is so all or nothing and if this aspect is not mastered the game fails. When these guys lab the game they are clearly generating ratings which they need to and tailoring them as they see fit however they are failing to have the game represent the proper animations at the default 50/50 level.

They are seeing what GOES INTO the ratings in the lab work they do but in the final stage they basically set everything to 50's and package the game and send it out... they are not testing the final product and seeing what the game actually represents at the most neutered - I mean neutral level of gameplay.

If they truly tested and approved the finished product they would see the errors and nuances and that is where the weighing comes in. You need to weigh the final product to ensure that a 50 for run block gives you enough of a dynamic challenge for a 50 block shed that you will see the neccessary animations by Default.. the same goes for WR/DB animations.. it all needs to be tested and approved at the level of all 50's so the user doesn't have to create a sim product himself - it does say NFL on the license right?

If you don't get what I'm saying yet - just understand that the game does have the potential imbedded in it but it requires major tweaking and investigating and pulling and stretching.. it's a laborious engineer job to go in there and create a sim product from the ground up using scraps and pieces you have no effective manual on..

If the game did apply and distribute mass appropriately and momentum appropriately - we would feel the difference in how each WR runs a route, how a physical buff db feels versus a scrawny 'don't want no problems' db.. we would see lineman driving each-other back with force back and forth on a consistent basis.. we would have no hyperactive interest in creating a simulation of real life because it would already be represented..

For too long the game has been governed by speed and agility. Phobia is absolutely justified in his statements re: a brandon browner experience versus a deion anders experience.. Deion himself admitted he didn't like to hit - it was a 'business decision' - that's the authenticity of sports.. it's not always skill but sometimes Will and that willpower needs to be expressed through these players as well as their Power in general..

Fake it till you make it should be there motto .. I aint jumping on their pump fakes though.. I'm enjoying the game through my own tailored experience but justice will be served.

I won't get into how they should make their ratings system - that's all arbitrary - I just say, make it work - the animations will tell the story.

# 59 hanzsomehanz @ 01/09/13 02:38 AM

Just alluding to what I said earlier concerning the cramming into a single ability. Here is more science on their passing technology.

http://www.madden-school.com/maddenalysis/

Some don't see the path of error in their programing and simply see it plain as print: THA = short, medium, long. done.

Nah, ain't nobody in their right mind going to say Vick is as accurate as Peyton! Give them a skills competition challenge. There is no GM or Scout who will scout Vick as being on the same level as Peyton in accuracy.

Before we get stuck on Passing though, take Catching for another example in theory.

You have Catching then you have:

Catch in Traffic
Spectacular Catch
Route Running
Release

You could even factor in Carrying - the ability to 'carry through a catch' into a football move.

If EA is going to divide their metrics, which they are, then they need to weigh them. This article above goes into detail on how the ratings are weighed. Everything has a different weight to it regardless of it's size.

In theory, this means, it is possible for a big empty box to weigh less than a small box containing a brick.

Not every rating in the rating system holds the same weight and this is what requires meticulous labbing - serious statistical engineering. Ea cannot with confidence speak on a single rating because their rating system lacks that type of integrity. In statistics, you deal with confidence which is basically the significance of a statistic - in this case, a metric or rating, be it player ability or penalty or variables such as subs, injuries, global game speed for min. speed threshold etc.

When you know how much one side weights than you can fairly balance the other side. This type of analysis is not completed in their lab work - it's clearly evident in the final product.

Because all these ratings are battling against one another - QBA versus INT's and Pass Reaction and Pass Rush etc - you naturally have a war zone with ammunition firing off in all directions and it can be a schizophrenic parade if you don't get a hold of it.

Everyone needs to play true to their self and true to the sport at that all 50's level. We understand that the game is designed for 5 minute and 6 minute QTRS for Online and as such the game has to simulate real life by using numbers that are higher than 'sim like' so as to create more chances in an effort to make up for time lost.

If we can understand the nature of that last paragraph, we can give them some leniency. BUT - that is only speaking to chance. Yes because it is online and not everyone can play 15 minute qtrs - not feasible nor plausible for matchmaking purposes and ranking but that doesn't mean Peyton should no longer play like Peyton and should be forced into situations. Nor should running backs who lack speed be exiled because they can't keep up in the six minute wind sprints of online play. Nahh.. that's what's gotta be changed it can't be used as an excuse. It's not a plausible one.

Peyton should play like Peyton out the box - regardless! AP should play like AP out the box REGARDLESS. And every player should stand a fighting chance regardless - these are pros and the sun shines on everyone - so does the rain.

If ratings were respected by default without any force or suction then we could all breath easy. If the interactions were not manipulated by outside forces and hidden mechanisms (LBz's rant) then we could all breathe easy.

Unfortunately, it is their very rating system and programming that is doing all this jockeying. You give every QB a rating but you also give them a penalty hit immediately to that rating which is 50% as well as to their ability by using a 50 across the board. So, when someone takes Peyton and makes the right decisions they can still succumb to failure because EA's hand in the pie decides that there should always be a 50/50 chance that any QB will throw a pick even if he makes the right read and has the appropriate accuracy however we will encourage users to overcome this hurdle by finding the latest and greatest exploits found in our playbooks! WTF?!

If physics and fatigue were truly represented we would immediately see the crazy zig zagging suffer. LB's zig zagging at the LOS non stop and then sharply blitzing through to hit the RB faster than you can hit a light switch - nah that would end up suffering too because that's, well.. not physically possible and defies all science of logic and gravity.. we are stuck to the ground by force and as such our bodies have limitations over them. These limitations need to be respected in the game at the most basic level. In NBA you will fatigue if you do this wacko running around job. If you don't, somethings wrong.. alot of tedious exploits and mishaps would be put to bed if player movements and player capabilities were simulated more artfully and not so outside the lines.

A player running frenetically behind the LOS should not be also capable of blitzing through a crowd of people and whilst maintaining his speed and not losing an ounce of pursuit. There needs to be more situations presented clearly observable where a player is 'out of the play'. I feel like its like telling a child, "ok, put down the glue.. put away the vacuum.. that's not what it's made for.."

EA needs to grow-up as a company and grow out of these childish ways of manufacturing what is supposed to be a simulated Pro. American football game. A sport players earn millions and ten millions of dollars to play. If they were as serious as AP was about recovering from his knee operation - they would surely overcome and calibrate a MVG (most valued game) of the Year.

# 60 rootofalleli @ 01/09/13 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hanzsomehanz


	If you don't get what I'm saying yet - just understand that the game does have the potential imbedded in it but it requires major tweaking and investigating and pulling and stretching.. it's a laborious engineer job to go in there and create a sim product from the ground up using scraps and pieces you have no effective manual on.

Some of what you're saying goes over my head, but I can get on board with this. I always feel like there could be a football game lurking somewhere in Madden. Usually someone around here comes up with a slider set that creates an experience I can live with.

But there's minimal effort from the other side - from EA - to support what we do. They don't explain anything in depth, they don't bother to adjust numbers once the game is out (loltuners!), and they don't have a long enough development cycle to do more than iron out the majority of hideous, game-killing bugs.

We say some bad stuff around here about the quality assurance work they do at EA, and I'm sure that if designers read it (slim chance!) they feel frustrated. The reality is that there must be some QA over there. But the short cycle and the need for new features to fuel the hype train mean that QA is devoted to catching really nasty crashes and glitches. I'm not talking about lousy coverage or suction blocking or psychic DBs - I'm talking about punts going down instead of up or linebackers warping 10 yards on every play or X-Boxes shutting down every time there's an interception. That's the level EA is operating on, and that's why we have the game we have, where any explanation at all is seen by them as a special treat and by us as a halfhearted joke.

« Previous 1 234 5 6 Next »

More Links

Clint Oldenburg Explains the Strength Rating For Linemen in Madden