Home
Madden 12 News Post


The Fantasy Football Informer has posted a new interview featuring new EA Sports Football GM Cam Weber. The interview touched many points, namely the changes to secondary play in Madden NFL 12.

Quote:
"Our defensive secondary play has received a major upgrade this year.” Cam went on to tell me how zone coverage behavior was addressed and that the AI(artificial intelligence) was tuned and given greater depth. “You’re going to see a major change in that (defensive secondary AI) in Madden NFL 12."

To read the full post, click here.

Game: Madden NFL 12Reader Score: 6.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 44 - View All
Madden NFL 12 Videos
Member Comments
# 21 TheFFInformer @ 04/23/11 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDKing
All the same stuff was said about Ian when he got here... Talk is cheap ! I'll believe it when I see it.
Your right TDKing's in the end the proof is in the pudding. I am not asking you to drink the kool-aid with this years Madden. But I am going to tell you Cam has ideas that speak to the core Madden fan. When Cam speaks about vision he is speaking about all of EA's football titles, present and future. That vision is not three years by the way he is thinking much further ahead than just three years. He detailed this vision in our interview and all that I am doing is painting a picture to you the reader of Cam and his ideas.

One more thing. If you're skeptic and want proof EA will begin to provide that proof starting April 28th at http://www.ea.com/madden-nfl some cool new features will be revealed.
 
# 22 jfsolo @ 04/23/11 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankdatazz22
I was about to say the same thing. You could've replaced Ian's name in many places in the interview and it wouldn't have changed a thing ("Cam/Ian gets it" "Cam/Ian wants to make a sim game for football fans"). I can see the "suits won't let him do what he wants" excuse easily rearing it's head.

The one thing I thought was interesting is where he said he feels they "significantly moved the needle" when it comes to gameplay in this year's game. He should be held to it. Instead of everyone making excuses for the series as they have year after year after year. At this point there's just no excuse whatsoever for the game to lag behind older/less advantaged games. They're so old that at this point they can't even be used as a barometer as to where Madden needs to be. Until people come into these games w/expectations instead of having none so they can be "pleasantly surprised" by modest improvements, Madden/NCAA will lag behind the great sports games of this generation imo.
"significantly moved" is, of course, a relative perspective for multiple reasons. Lets not be coy and dance around the issue. For people who feel as is 2K's gameplay/A.I. was/is vastly superior to Madden's the movement may not be significant in their eyes.

Ian often got caught up in a verbal battle of trying to "shut people up about 2K forever", or something to that effect. That was a losing battle for many reasons, not the least of which is, its really tough to defeat a game that was turned into a martyr and/or ghost.

Cam is probably just focusing on Madden's improvement vs. itself, so within that context he may be 100% justified in making the statements he has made. Taking this tact will satiate the vast majority of football gamers. The strongest 2K advocates may not find those efforts to be good enough, but I don't think he's going to concern himself with that segment of the gaming public.

Given what we've seen the last 5-7 years or so, reduced expectations is actually the logical position to take if you have to play a new football game every year. Most football gamers are just being honest with themselves. They are going to break down and buy the new version every year, so they aren't really in a position to demand a superior product, or else. So modest improvements are celebrated wildly, because for them, there is no other recourse.
 
# 23 KBLover @ 04/23/11 11:18 AM
I'm hopeful.

I didn't get Madden 11 (and sounds like a good choice as I'd be more frustrated with it from what I've read - especially defensively), but am planning - as of now - to give M12 a shot.
 
# 24 roadman @ 04/23/11 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankdatazz22
I was about to say the same thing. You could've replaced Ian's name in many places in the interview and it wouldn't have changed a thing ("Cam/Ian gets it" "Cam/Ian wants to make a sim game for football fans"). I can see the "suits won't let him do what he wants" excuse easily rearing it's head.

The one thing I thought was interesting is where he said he feels they "significantly moved the needle" when it comes to gameplay in this year's game. He should be held to it. Instead of everyone making excuses for the series as they have year after year after year. At this point there's just no excuse whatsoever for the game to lag behind older/less advantaged games. They're so old that at this point they can't even be used as a barometer as to where Madden needs to be. Until people come into these games w/expectations instead of having none so they can be "pleasantly surprised" by modest improvements, Madden/NCAA will lag behind the great sports games of this generation imo.
Before crucifying the new kid on the block or EA, why don't we sit back and wait a week before the info starts pouring out. Yes, I know that is another saying around here, but if the second video I saw in NCAA regarding tackling is any indication where Madden is going, I'm favorably impressed. Also, let's remember the track record of this person. FIFA and Fight Night are pretty good games to put on your resume. Also, Ian's title and the new kid on the blocks title is much different, almost like night and day. You can't even come close to comparing the two.

Maybe this year we can be "pleasantly surprised" by Ian's last Madden.
 
# 25 Armor and Sword @ 04/23/11 11:41 AM
I really want this game to be great. I really do.

As I said I am keeping expectations very low. Because after Madden 2010 I had them sky high for Madden 2011. Bought 2011 on release day after really feeling and seeing a huge upgrade in Madden 2010 (my first next gen Madden).

If the core gameplay is tuned to make it a true sim that would actually be a huge reason to buy it alone. Couple that with a return to a deeper feature rich offline Franchise mode and we will have a winner like NCAA 2011 was.

Come on EA....I know you can do it. You have before (Madden 99, 2005).
 
# 26 spankdatazz22 @ 04/23/11 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfsolo
"significantly moved" is, of course, a relative perspective for multiple reasons. Lets not be coy and dance around the issue. For people who feel as is 2K's gameplay/A.I. was/is vastly superior to Madden's the movement may not be significant in their eyes.

Ian often got caught up in a verbal battle of trying to "shut people up about 2K forever", or something to that effect. That was a losing battle for many reasons, not the least of which is, its really tough to defeat a game that was turned into a martyr and/or ghost.

Cam is probably just focusing on Madden's improvement vs. itself, so within that context he may be 100% justified in making the statements he has made. Taking this tact will satiate the vast majority of football gamers. The strongest 2K advocates may not find those efforts to be good enough, but I don't think he's going to concern himself with that segment of the gaming public.

Given what we've seen the last 5-7 years or so, reduced expectations is actually the logical position to take if you have to play a new football game every year. Most football gamers are just being honest with themselves. They are going to break down and buy the new version every year, so they aren't really in a position to demand a superior product, or else. So modest improvements are celebrated wildly, because for them, there is no other recourse.
Good post. I agree somewhat w/your point re 2K5 martyrdom - I've said many times Tiburon probably did more to raise 2K5 awareness than 2K themselves ever did on their own. I think it's a mistake to think it's people that think "2K's gameplay/AI was vastly superior" because you can really lump the older Madden/NCAA's in w/that argument also. I thought better of it, but the other day I started to post videos of NCAA 06 (PS2) and APF to juxtapose a point I was trying to make. It's not like it's only old 2K fans "hating" on Madden/NCAA, because I'm sure there are many that actually like the games now. Just as I'm sure there are old Madden/NCAA fans that don't like what the new games have become. It goes both ways. I find one of the more interesting things that's occurred over the past few years is how w/no competition, people are actually trying to draw sharp contrasts between Madden and NCAA even though they're essentially the same game, made by the same studio. How many people are out there saying "NCAA is great, Madden sucks"?

To that end I agree w/you that it's about perspective. To me those older games stopped being legitimate barometers years ago. So my expectations are an extrapolation of where the older titles were, and where I would think the titles would be now. It's not about expecting Madden 12 to be better than APF for example - that should be a given. Madden 07 should've been better than APF given the circumstances. If we can speak honestly and say that it wasn't, then that shows how much Tiburon's game is lacking and it should be judged accordingly.

You (seem to) take the viewpoint that because of what we've seen the past 5-7 years, we need to adjust our expectations. I take the viewpoint that because EA has chosen to corner the football gaming market for themselves, that I'm not going to lower my expectations. I would think most core sports fans don't expect their games to be overhauled every year and will buy those games yearly, as long as the games have a solid to stellar foundation to begin with. When looking at baseball, basketball, hockey, soccer, boxing, etc. most people can say games in those genres made a generational leap at some point this generation. Madden/NCAA have made progressive leaps, that much is certain. But until it makes that generational leap I don't think it's wrong to have high expectations for the games. Especially when they've placed themselves in the position to make themselves the the only ones available
 
# 27 LorenzoDC @ 04/23/11 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armor & Sword
If the core gameplay is tuned to make it a true sim that would actually be a huge reason to buy it alone. Couple that with a return to a deeper feature rich offline Franchise mode and we will have a winner like NCAA 2011 was.
Yup. And if I may be so bold, please make it so sim gamers don't have to earn yet another annual Ph. D. in slider adjustment this year to make the game more or less approximate American football.

Is it so much to ask? Is it? IS IT I SAY??!!!
 
# 28 kjcheezhead @ 04/23/11 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankdatazz22
Good post. I agree somewhat w/your point re 2K5 martyrdom - I've said many times Tiburon probably did more to raise 2K5 awareness than 2K themselves ever did on their own. I think it's a mistake to think it's people that think "2K's gameplay/AI was vastly superior" because you can really lump the older Madden/NCAA's in w/that argument also. I thought better of it, but the other day I started to post videos of NCAA 06 (PS2) and APF to juxtapose a point I was trying to make. It's not like it's only old 2K fans "hating" on Madden/NCAA, because I'm sure there are many that actually like the games now. Just as I'm sure there are old Madden/NCAA fans that don't like what the new games have become. It goes both ways. I find one of the more interesting things that's occurred over the past few years is how w/no competition, people are actually trying to draw sharp contrasts between Madden and NCAA even though they're essentially the same game, made by the same studio. How many people are out there saying "NCAA is great, Madden sucks"?
Very true. There are a lot of ps2 madden fans that still find the ps2 modes and features to be deeper than current games that get lumped into the bring back 2k group. Even the youtube/sim standard crowd is viewed as EA bashers who just want to see 2k come back when in fact the most well known of them, Apex, is a fan of Madden 2004s animations and features like the playbook editor.

I have been accused of having a 2k agenda several times as well when my favorite game of all time is actually Madden 08 last gen.

Your point about posters saying NCAA is great/Madden sucks is good too. I found this site as Madden 10 info was dropping and seems at that time NCAA 10 was seen as Madden 09.5. A year later posters claim its the greatest game the football world has ever seen and has always been superior to Madden which is absolute garbage. I just don't see how anyone can love one and hate the other either. They play very similar to me.
 
# 29 K_GUN @ 04/23/11 01:35 PM
as long as DB AI doesn't resort to cheating
 
# 30 kjcheezhead @ 04/23/11 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_GUN
as long as DB AI doesn't resort to cheating
Well here is a shot of man coverage from the NCAA gameplay vid. The wr is trailing the db and the db is mirroring the wrs moves. It doesn't look good to me at all.

GIFSoup
 
# 31 roadman @ 04/23/11 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjcheezhead
Well here is a shot of man coverage from the NCAA gameplay vid. The wr is trailing the db and the db is mirroring the wrs moves. It doesn't look good to me at all.

GIFSoup
Yeah, I saw that too. Hopefully, it will be tuned before shipment.

Also, the videos shown were still a WIP.
 
# 32 Senator Palmer @ 04/23/11 02:15 PM
That vid doesn't horrify me as much as if I were looking at the DB mirror a deep dig route, which was the huge issue last year before NCAA 11 was tuned.

On that one, the DB is on top of the WR because, I'm hoping, he was in a deep third zone coverage like in cover 3, and the WR just can't motor pass him. Then he stops and tries to make a play on the ball. I don't think that vid in itself represents a huge issue, but a lack of available animations to represent the DB chopping down his steps and gathering himself to reach up to make the swat.
 
# 33 jmood88 @ 04/23/11 02:26 PM
I'm not getting excited about anything until I actually see it work.
 
# 34 BlueNGold @ 04/23/11 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjcheezhead
Your point about posters saying NCAA is great/Madden sucks is good too. I found this site as Madden 10 info was dropping and seems at that time NCAA 10 was seen as Madden 09.5. A year later posters claim its the greatest game the football world has ever seen and has always been superior to Madden which is absolute garbage. I just don't see how anyone can love one and hate the other either. They play very similar to me.
This doesn't even make any sense.

People aren't supposed to enjoy NCAA if they don't like Madden? They're two different games. That's like saying if you don't like NHL, you shouldn't like FIFA because they're both developed by EA Canada.
 
# 35 ch46647 @ 04/23/11 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmood88
I'm not getting excited about anything until I actually see it work.
This!

EA are the kings of telling us how great things are without SHOWING us how great they are. I loved Madden on PS2 and prior. However, this generation has been nothing but a complete letdown for me and many of my friends who played Madden religiously.
 
# 36 Tyrant8RDFL @ 04/23/11 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Legend Killer
I love the sound of this guy thinking and all. I hope the D is working alot this year and all. But please for the love of god take out the AI mirror imaging WR routes crap. Other then that it sounds good. Can't wait until Thursday for all the info and gameplay.
Agree. I say if the defender is doing a great job covering the receiver, and jumping his route. Please lets make sense out of it by having the defender look at his receiver the whole time , and then look back for the ball when the receiver does.
 
# 37 BlueNGold @ 04/23/11 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ch46647
This!

EA are the kings of telling us how great things are without SHOWING us how great they are. I loved Madden on PS2 and prior. However, this generation has been nothing but a complete letdown for me and many of my friends who played Madden religiously.
Agreed with both of you guys.

I'm optimistic this year, but I'm not making a decision on whether or not I'm buying the game until I see videos and play the demo and see that certain past annoyances have been fixed.

I stupidly bought Madden 11 last year because I was in an online franchise carrying over from Madden 10, even though you could tell from the videos that it wasn't a big leap forward like Madden 10 was, so I'm not making that mistake again.
 
# 38 Tyrant8RDFL @ 04/23/11 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjcheezhead
Well here is a shot of man coverage from the NCAA gameplay vid. The wr is trailing the db and the db is mirroring the wrs moves. It doesn't look good to me at all.

GIFSoup
Wait a minute. A db can recognize the wr is running a fly pattern , and then in turn run his coverage to play the fly pattern. Why is this a troubling video to see???

I do not agree.
 
# 39 Armor and Sword @ 04/23/11 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinking Out Loud
Granted, they play very similar but they FEEL very different. I think the main factor that accounts for some of the same people that love NCAA 11, hating Madden 11, is because of immersion. NCAA 11 does a much better job of giving the gamer a feeling of playing collegiate football than Madden 11 does of playing in the NFL.

I think that's also why so many people look upon past football games so favorably. When people are frustrated about past features missing, they are frustrated about missing how those past features help immerse them in the game. Graphically, next-gen football has blown last-gen football out the water, as they should have but immersion wise, not so much.

The more immersion a video game can provide the gamer, the more likely it is for most gamers to miss and/or overlook that games short comings.
Winner winner chicken dinner.

I think those of us that are Madden fans (I am talking 20 years here) felt NCAA 2011 played a tighter game of football but more importantly immersed us into the College atmosphere, had a deep dynasty mode and online dynasty was also fantastic. NCAA 2011 is a great game.

Madden 2011 while on the field with very good sliders, and cpu game planning plays a good game of football, the immersion and presentation as well as the very spreadsheet stale franchise mode fell really short and kept the game from being great. I would overlook some flaws on the field if the game really immersed me in the NFL and kept the franchise mode a must play year round like the other games I am playing now (which are insanely good).

Again I hope Madden hits the ball out of the park. I would love nothing more than to be in love with Madden again like I was on the PS2 versions.
 
# 40 RGiles36 @ 04/23/11 05:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfsolo
"significantly moved" is, of course, a relative perspective for multiple reasons. Lets not be coy and dance around the issue. For people who feel as is 2K's gameplay/A.I. was/is vastly superior to Madden's the movement may not be significant in their eyes.

Ian often got caught up in a verbal battle of trying to "shut people up about 2K forever", or something to that effect. That was a losing battle for many reasons, not the least of which is, its really tough to defeat a game that was turned into a martyr and/or ghost.

Cam is probably just focusing on Madden's improvement vs. itself, so within that context he may be 100% justified in making the statements he has made. Taking this tact will satiate the vast majority of football gamers. The strongest 2K advocates may not find those efforts to be good enough, but I don't think he's going to concern himself with that segment of the gaming public.
Great post!
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.