Can someone post arian foster's increases. Im at work and want to know what was increased to bring him up 7 overall points
Just finished downloading the update, noticed that Foster Ball Carrier Vision is now up to 94. Didn't have time to compare, sorry. BCV seemed to be the most noticeable at 94.
Glad to see that the o-line got some love also. I think they had more to do with that performance than the back. Did you see those holes???
Yeah the o-line did a brillant job opening holes against the Indianapolis Colts defence. Glad to see they got some much deserved respect on this weeks update. Cant wait to get home and download this weeks update!
SO after one game we rate Arian Foster as a GOD, wow. How can we rate players after ONE GAME - if you start this then you will have to rate the rosters every darn week, how about doing it every 4 games when you change ratings, I agree with the injuries, but good lord making someone better or worse just becasue of one game, BULL CRAP. What if they play against a solid Def as in the Jets or Ravens, or Solid Offense as in NE or Indy. STUPID, another way for EA to fu( k up a good thing
SO after one game we rate Arian Foster as a GOD, wow. How can we rate players after ONE GAME - if you start this then you will have to rate the rosters every darn week, how about doing it every 4 games when you change ratings, I agree with the injuries, but good lord making someone better or worse just because of one game, BULL CRAP. What if they play against a solid Def as in the Jets or Ravens, or Solid Offense as in NE or Indy. STUPID, another way for EA to fu( k up a good thing
I don't think its a bad system. A.Foster got a decent rating, a guy who breaks over 200 + yards on the ground needs a fair rating, no matter who it is. His line was solid, he was solid and 85 is a fair rating (You couldn't run 100 yards with him previously). It's no 90+ rating like some of the other backs but it's still solid and justified for him in this update, week 1 is also a good baseline to watch each player play a full game. Thats a different story playing against a stiff run defense, Rice had a mediocre game against the Jets but no drop in OVR, which is spot on. Foster was just 1 of many players rated poorly as EA never really had a good baseline on skills, a full game proved what he is capable of. So in short, you have to be honest, a back who rushes for over 200 yards deserves an 85. Fair?
SO after one game we rate Arian Foster as a GOD, wow. How can we rate players after ONE GAME - if you start this then you will have to rate the rosters every darn week, how about doing it every 4 games when you change ratings, I agree with the injuries, but good lord making someone better or worse just becasue of one game, BULL CRAP. What if they play against a solid Def as in the Jets or Ravens, or Solid Offense as in NE or Indy. STUPID, another way for EA to fu( k up a good thing
Really! It blows my mind the way people think here. I love th EA is out to get you stuff. If you are so brilliant at rating players, go get a job at EA and do better!
I love the weekly updates. However, I wish they had roster share like 2k.
Really! It blows my mind the way people think here. I love th EA is out to get you stuff. If you are so brilliant at rating players, go get a job at EA and do better!
I love the weekly updates. However, I wish they had roster share like 2k.
sometimes it seems no matter what EA does there will always be unhappy people.
will this update cut down sum of the broken tackles cause even after the patch the cpu is breaking 5 or more tackles i had 2 edit my sliders 2 tone it down but they still break alot
will this update cut down sum of the broken tackles cause even after the patch the cpu is breaking 5 or more tackles i had 2 edit my sliders 2 tone it down but they still break alot
This is a ROSTER update not a PATCH so no it will not fix that problem of yours