11:00 PM - June 15, 2009 by Steve_OS
NCAA Football 10 News Post
NCAA Football 10 Videos
Member Comments
# 41
BigBlue10989 @ 06/16/09 03:07 AM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 42
carlhungis @ 06/16/09 05:59 AM
It sounds like it is unpopular to complain about the microtransactions, but I am going to do it anyways.
I guess I am unclear as to how it is going to work. Can you still unlock these things in game without purchasing them? To force people to pay for a recruiting adviser is pretty cheap. I can understand giving the option to simply purchase them to avoid the hassle of unlocking them in game, but if there is no other option but to purchase then it sucks.
Hopefully they do it like Tiger Woods, where you can use a microtransaction or use in game credit, although it doesn't appear to work that way.
I guess I am unclear as to how it is going to work. Can you still unlock these things in game without purchasing them? To force people to pay for a recruiting adviser is pretty cheap. I can understand giving the option to simply purchase them to avoid the hassle of unlocking them in game, but if there is no other option but to purchase then it sucks.
Hopefully they do it like Tiger Woods, where you can use a microtransaction or use in game credit, although it doesn't appear to work that way.
# 43
moylan1234 @ 06/16/09 06:21 AM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 46
acts238shaun @ 06/16/09 11:04 AM
Several things that caught my attention:
A TE with more than 40 catches - the guy from Western Michigan had 89 in one screen shot.
Completion percentage and yards per carry are down across the board.
Sacks are more geared to the DLine.
The Thorpe Award is geared more towards tackles and deflections instead of interceptions.
Nice jumps in OVR after training.
I am looking forward to this game. I was hesitant, but I feel better after looking at the screen and vids. I've been away, and someone called this NCAA 9.5. I can deal with that with the vids I saw. I loved seeing the RB power thru the middle in some of those vids. Keeping my pre-order.
A TE with more than 40 catches - the guy from Western Michigan had 89 in one screen shot.
Completion percentage and yards per carry are down across the board.
Sacks are more geared to the DLine.
The Thorpe Award is geared more towards tackles and deflections instead of interceptions.
Nice jumps in OVR after training.
I am looking forward to this game. I was hesitant, but I feel better after looking at the screen and vids. I've been away, and someone called this NCAA 9.5. I can deal with that with the vids I saw. I loved seeing the RB power thru the middle in some of those vids. Keeping my pre-order.
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 48
countryboy @ 06/16/09 11:13 AM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
These are all Spread team QB's and that should be noted. These are the few cases where this occurs.
# 50
countryboy @ 06/16/09 11:21 AM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 51
Matrix-Monkey @ 06/16/09 11:24 AM
Didn't read the whole thread so sorry if this was already posted...
But why the new bar graphs for prospect ratings? Now I have to scroll down a long list while checking through the recruits? Just because someone thought it would be more clear that B+ is higher than B? What 5 year old doesn't know that?
But why the new bar graphs for prospect ratings? Now I have to scroll down a long list while checking through the recruits? Just because someone thought it would be more clear that B+ is higher than B? What 5 year old doesn't know that?
I feel as though stats would be more accurate if the devs took the offensive strategy sliders more serious. The Tebow Child isn't going to throw for 44 TD and 4000 YDs anytime soon. The problem is that they use "Spread" for every spread team in the game - when their iteration of it is passing. They should use Option Run more often for those teams who run the spread option because you get more accurate stats. Tuning teams' respective aggressiveness/conversative play would also help.
It annoys me that as a commish I can't adjust these things in an OD.
It annoys me that as a commish I can't adjust these things in an OD.
Thanks Steve. FSU's individual player ratings were ridiculously high after the development process thing.
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 55
rollinphat @ 06/16/09 11:38 AM
two things that still bother me
1) on the game preview screen it still has the total yards listed for each team.
IMO, it shouldn't say that Team A has thrown for 3000 yds this season. It should list the teams AVERAGES, not their totals. Then the team ranking should be based off this AVERAGE.
Showing that I've thrown for 2601 yards doesn't mean much, but to show that I average 289 yards a game does. Also, if you have a couple of bye's early in the season you'll be ranked like #105 in passing yet you AVERAGE 450 yds a game. That is very misleading.
2) top classes should have another menu off of it to sort the recruiting class rankings by CONFERENCE. not really sure why this isn't in there.
1) on the game preview screen it still has the total yards listed for each team.
IMO, it shouldn't say that Team A has thrown for 3000 yds this season. It should list the teams AVERAGES, not their totals. Then the team ranking should be based off this AVERAGE.
Showing that I've thrown for 2601 yards doesn't mean much, but to show that I average 289 yards a game does. Also, if you have a couple of bye's early in the season you'll be ranked like #105 in passing yet you AVERAGE 450 yds a game. That is very misleading.
2) top classes should have another menu off of it to sort the recruiting class rankings by CONFERENCE. not really sure why this isn't in there.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
The 209 rating Tebow has and the TD-INT ratio is also overdone, and would be record setting, but other than that, the numbers are pretty good.
On the picture sorted by INTs, they have at least 7 guys with 20+ INTs. In real college football, only 3 players have thrown 20 INTs in a season in the past 5 years (since 04). You usually either get benched or aren't allowed to throw much if you're that bad. The Texas Tech guy was unrealistically awful. He had a 43.5% and a probably record setting 25 picks. How would you be able to hold down the starting job at a major college tossing over 2 INTs a game while hitting only 43.5%?
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
The bars do look really stupid, and its going to make recruiting more tedious when it comes to researching prospects.. Why was it deemed necessary to change from how the ratings were shown? Why do they insist on fixing what is not broke, while not fixing what is?
Thanks Ben.
Now we have this, where you can clearly see that a D- is not as good as a B+...as if no one understood that already.
Post A Comment