More Links

capa · 08-26-2015, 11:13 PM

What are you folks using for speed parity (the old threshold from 15) this year?

C

JoshC1977 · 08-26-2015, 11:24 PM

I did some initial testing on this earlier tonight. At 100, acceleration ratings are essentially nullified, so it isn't particularly realistic. At 0, there is a lot more separation between fast and slow players. Near default isn't too bad frankly....I am going to look at ranges somewhere between 45-55.

4thQtrStre5S · 08-26-2015, 11:33 PM

50 seems great this year

capa · 08-27-2015, 08:35 AM

It does look like something within a normal range of 45-55 will suffice this year. No drastic changes like last year (0 or 100)...

C

Armor and Sword · 08-27-2015, 09:16 AM

I am using 0 again and want true separation from elite speed and average to below average speed.

I think this year it is really working far better than last year. Speed kills and you will get explosive plays from explosive players.

As you should.

It makes double coverage, spy, and defensive adjustments part of the puzzle and the chess game. I am really digging the speed ratings and the threshold this year has it pretty on point.

Zero for me.

NoleFan · 08-27-2015, 09:39 AM

I see both sides of the discussion.

I agree that speed isn't the only thing that's important in football so I can support increasing it.

On the flip side, in some situations speed IS a major factor so I can see lowering it.

To that end, I just leave it at 50.

Either way, the speed threshold slider seems to have a HUGE impact on the game.

BleedGreen710 · 08-27-2015, 10:37 AM

what cautions me away from lowering it and making faster players get more separation is the fact that rookies come in with jacked speed ratings, much higher then the default rated roster. I feel that lowering it will magnify that. I leave mine at 50 and have no complaints.

nhupkogm · 08-27-2015, 10:42 AM

It does look like something within a normal range of 45-55 will suffice this year. No drastic changes like last year

08-26-2015, 11:13 PM	#1
capa Banned OVR: 21 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: CT Blog Entries: 1	What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? What are you folks using for speed parity (the old threshold from 15) this year? C

08-26-2015, 11:24 PM	#2
JoshC1977 All Star OVR: 5 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Morgantown, WV Posts: 11,569	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? I did some initial testing on this earlier tonight. At 100, acceleration ratings are essentially nullified, so it isn't particularly realistic. At 0, there is a lot more separation between fast and slow players. Near default isn't too bad frankly....I am going to look at ranges somewhere between 45-55. capa likes this. __________________ Play the games you love, not the games you want to love.

08-26-2015, 11:33 PM	#3
4thQtrStre5S MVP OVR: 0 Join Date: Nov 2013	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? 50 seems great this year ggsimmonds, NoleFan, BleedGreen710 and 1 others like this.

08-27-2015, 08:35 AM	#4
capa Banned OVR: 21 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: CT Blog Entries: 1	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? It does look like something within a normal range of 45-55 will suffice this year. No drastic changes like last year (0 or 100)... C NoleFan likes this.

08-27-2015, 09:16 AM	#5
Armor and Sword The Lama OVR: 0 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Parkland, Florida Posts: 21,198 Blog Entries: 5	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? I am using 0 again and want true separation from elite speed and average to below average speed. I think this year it is really working far better than last year. Speed kills and you will get explosive plays from explosive players. As you should. It makes double coverage, spy, and defensive adjustments part of the puzzle and the chess game. I am really digging the speed ratings and the threshold this year has it pretty on point. Zero for me. ithinkimchipkelly, GlennN, Lucas_III and 1 others like this. __________________ Now Playing on PS5: NHL25 - Panthers YR1 (30-9-2) CFB 25 - Alabama YR7 (6-1) MLB 20 The Show - Yankees YR8 Spring Training, 1985 Yankees Replay Undisputed Dragon Age Veilguard Follow me on Twitch https://www.twitch.tv/armorandsword

	Why Player Ratings Change When Starting Dynasty Mode in College Football 25
	What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?
	The House Rules Hub for Recruiting in College Football 25 Dynasty Mode

08-27-2015, 09:39 AM	#6
NoleFan Hall Of Fame OVR: 22 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NC Posts: 12,856	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? I see both sides of the discussion. I agree that speed isn't the only thing that's important in football so I can support increasing it. On the flip side, in some situations speed IS a major factor so I can see lowering it. To that end, I just leave it at 50. Either way, the speed threshold slider seems to have a HUGE impact on the game. Armor and Sword likes this. __________________ F-L-O-R-I-D-A! S-T-A-T-E! Florida State! Florida State! Florida State! Wooooo!

08-27-2015, 10:37 AM	#7
BleedGreen710 Eagles Fan OVR: 6 Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Corvallis, OR Posts: 4,036	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? what cautions me away from lowering it and making faster players get more separation is the fact that rookies come in with jacked speed ratings, much higher then the default rated roster. I feel that lowering it will magnify that. I leave mine at 50 and have no complaints. NoleFan likes this.

08-27-2015, 10:42 AM	#8
nhupkogm Just started! OVR: 0 Join Date: Aug 2015	Re: What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year? It does look like something within a normal range of 45-55 will suffice this year. No drastic changes like last year

More Links

What are thoughts on Speed Parity this year?