Statistics and Sliders_Oraeon

[Oraeon1224]

I have previously done NCAA football sliders. I am going to use this thread to try to create Madden sliders in a similar format. For anyone with familiarity with my sliders I generally try not to use the max difficulty setting because it works by giving stat bonuses to CPU and penalties to player Will be using All pro. My main purpose is to create information on how sliders work and a base set I use. This helps others adjust sliders to get the results they want.


To download for PS3 look for STAT&SLIDERv1


FIRST SET OF SLIDERS:


Difficulty: All Pro
Speed: Normal
Quarter length: 14 minutes
Play clock time: 18 seconds
Injuries: 53 (goal is 1-2 per quarter but only key players & no line so reduced)
Fatigue: 60
Speed Threshold: 45


Offside: 70 (did work once less false starts reduced)
False start: 60 (goal ~2 per side per game)
Holding: 100 (goal ~2 per side per game, doesn't work)
Facemask: 54 (goal 1-2 per side for hands face, unsport etc...)
Defensive PI: Doesn't appear to work yet again EA will leave at 50
Offensive PI: Doesn't appear to work yet again EA will leave at 50
KR/PR: 50 (fairly rare in NFL)
Clipping: 100 (doesn't work)
Intentional grounding: 50 (AI never throws away)
Roughing the passer: 100 (Doesn't work)
Roughing the kicker: 100 (Doesn't work)

***Remember sliders are for the CPU game your skill determines player sliders except for Pass reaction/coverage (which effect CPU)
Player/CPU
QB accuracy: 15/22 (Goal 3-6 errant passes per game per ESPN stats)
Pass blocking: 50/100 (Goal 2-3 sacks per game; effects human rush but not AI)
WR catching: 34/42 (GOAL 3-5 drops per game per side)
Run blocking: 51/63 (GOAL 4-5 YPC for HB, 3-4 TFL/game)
Fumbles: 34/34 (Goal 0-1 fumbles per side per game; at least 1 for whole game)
Pass Reaction Time: 20 (lower = more deflections Goal 4-6)/50(reduce warping)
Interceptions: 5/40 (Goal 1-2 INT per side per game)
Pass coverage: 5 (AI receivers more open = less sacks)/50 (harder for human)
Tackling: 21/25 (goal 3-5 missed per game against HBs)
FG Power: 45/45
FG accuracy: 10/45
Punt Power: 44/42
Punt Accuracy: 10/40
Kickoff Power: 52/54


Autosub: Use armor and swords settings

[Oraeon1224]

NFL STATS (2013 by ESPN)

TEAM	DEF PTS ALLOW/G	DEF YD ALLOW/G	DEF PASS YD ALL/G	DEF RUSH YD ALL/G	DEF SACKS/G	DEF INT/G	DEF FF	DEF FUM REC/G	DEF PASS DEFL	PENALTY GAME	PENALTY YD/G	PUNT YD	FG%
Arizona	20.3	317.4	233	84.4	2.9	1.3	0.69	0.63	6.0	6	47	41.6	83.3
Atlanta	27.7	379.4	243.6	135.8	2.0	0.6	0.81	0.69	3.6	6	49	41.6	88.9
Baltimore	22	335.5	230.1	105.4	2.5	1.0	0.88	0.44	5.9	7	59	40.9	92.7
Buffalo	24.3	333.4	204.4	128.9	3.6	1.4	0.75	0.38	5.6	7	60	38	91.7
Carolina	15.1	301.3	214.3	86.9	3.8	1.3	0.69	0.63	4.0	5	42	43	88.9
Chicago	29.9	394.6	233.1	161.4	1.9	1.2	1.31	0.56	3.9	5	44	38.4	89.7
Cincinnati	19.1	305.5	209	96.5	2.7	1.3	0.81	0.69	5.6	6	63	41	81.8
Cleveland	25.4	332.4	221.1	111.3	2.5	0.9	0.56	0.44	4.9	7	58	39	80.8
Dallas	27	415.3	286.8	128.5	2.1	0.9	0.81	0.81	4.0	6	54	40.6	93.3
Denver	24.9	356	254.4	101.6	2.6	1.1	1.13	0.56	5.8	7	63	39.7	96.2
Detroit	23.5	346.6	246.9	99.8	2.1	0.9	0.88	0.44	5.3	7	58	43.1	79.2
Green Bay	26.8	372.3	247.3	125	2.8	0.7	1.19	0.69	4.1	5	50	40.5	89.2
Houston	26.8	317.6	195.2	122.4	2.0	0.4	0.75	0.25	4.2	7	71	41.6	74.3
Indianapolis	21	357.1	231.9	125.1	2.6	0.9	1.44	0.75	4.5	4	36	40.3	87.5
Jacksonville	28.1	379.4	247.6	131.8	1.9	0.7	1.00	0.63	4.4	6	50	42.2	92
Kansas City	19.1	367.8	247.6	120.2	2.9	1.3	0.88	0.94	6.0	6	48	42.6	78.6
Miami	20.9	359.4	234.5	124.9	2.6	1.1	0.75	0.38	4.8	4	37	44	76.5
Minnesota	30	397.6	287.2	110.4	2.6	0.8	0.81	0.50	3.7	4	43	40	86.7
New England	21.1	373.1	239	134.1	3.0	1.1	0.69	0.75	4.6	4	39	42.9	92.7
New Orleans	19	305.7	194.1	111.6	3.1	0.8	1.00	0.44	4.1	6	51	43.9	75
NY Giants	23.9	332.3	223.3	108.9	2.1	1.1	1.06	0.75	4.9	6	49	39.7	88.5
NY Jets	24.2	334.9	246.7	88.3	2.6	0.8	0.69	0.13	3.8	7	52	39.7	91.7
Oakland	28.3	363.7	255.8	107.9	2.4	0.6	1.31	0.81	2.5	7	57	42.7	70
Philadelphia	23.9	394	289.8	104.3	2.3	1.2	0.94	0.75	5.8	6	53	41.7	82.1
Pittsburgh	23.1	337.6	222.1	115.6	2.1	0.6	1.19	0.63	4.4	5	42	37	93.8
San Diego	21.8	366.5	258.7	107.8	2.2	0.7	0.81	0.38	3.9	6	48	40.3	91.9
San Francisco	17	316.9	221	95.9	2.4	1.1	0.81	0.69	5.0	6	53	44	88.9
Seattle	14.4	273.6	172	101.6	2.8	1.8	1.25	0.69	5.3	8	74	40.5	94.3
St. Louis	22.8	345	242.1	102.9	3.3	0.9	1.50	0.94	4.4	8	63	45.3	92.9
Tampa Bay	24.3	348	237.9	110.1	2.2	1.3	1.06	0.63	4.3	8	71	39.7	79.3
Tennessee	23.8	337.9	225.8	112.2	2.3	0.8	1.00	0.75	5.2	6	56	40.2	86.2
Washington	29.9	354.1	243.5	110.6	2.3	1.0	0.75	0.56	3.6	6	50	33.8	80.8

TEAM	OFF PLAY/G	OFF PASS ATT/G	OFF RUSH ATT/G	PASS CALL 1st	OFF PTS/G	OFF YD/G	OFF PASS YD/G	OFF RUSH YD/G	OFF PASS YD/ATT	OFF RUSH YD/ATT	OFF PASS COMP%	OFF PASS INT/G	OFF FUM/G	OFF FUML/G	OFF SACKS ALLOW	3rd Conv (%)	QB rating
Arizona	62	36	26	62%	23.7	346	250.1	96.3	7.5	3.6	63	1.4	0.63	0.38	2.6	35	83.9
Atlanta	61	41	20	69%	22.1	343	265.2	77.9	6.9	3.9	68	1.1	0.56	0.38	2.8	43	89.5
Baltimore	65	39	26	64%	20	307	224.4	83	6.3	3.1	59	1.4	0.19	0.13	3.0	36	72
Buffalo	67	33	34	50%	21.2	338	193.9	144	6.5	4.2	57	0.9	1.06	0.44	3.0	34	75
Carolina	60	30	30	53%	22.9	317	190.2	127	7.1	4.2	62	0.8	0.38	0.13	2.7	44	88.8
Chicago	61	36	25	63%	27.8	382	267.6	114	7.7	4.5	64	0.8	0.56	0.31	1.9	42	96.9
Cincinnati	67	37	30	62%	26.9	368	258.5	110	7.4	3.6	62	1.3	0.81	0.44	1.8	41	89
Cleveland	64	43	22	66%	19.3	339	252.9	86.4	6.4	4	56	1.3	0.25	0.19	3.1	35	75.7
Dallas	58	37	21	66%	27.4	341	247.1	94	7.2	4.5	64	0.8	0.81	0.31	2.2	35	95.7
Denver	71	42	29	67%	37.9	457	340.3	117	8.3	4.1	68	0.6	0.88	0.50	1.3	46	114.4
Detroit	67	40	28	63%	24.7	392	280.1	112	7.3	4	59	1.2	1.44	0.81	1.4	43	84.2
Green Bay	64	36	29	57%	26.1	400	266.8	134	8	4.7	64	1.0	0.63	0.31	2.8	41	91.7
Houston	65	40	26	64%	17.3	347	238.3	109	6.6	4.2	59	1.4	0.63	0.38	2.6	36	74
Indianapolis	62	36	26	60%	24.4	342	232.8	109	6.8	4.3	60	0.6	0.31	0.06	2.0	38	86.5
Jacksonville	61	37	24	65%	15.4	294	215.1	78.8	6.3	3.3	59	1.3	0.69	0.38	3.1	31	71.8
Kansas City	62	34	28	55%	26.9	337	208.8	129	6.5	4.7	61	0.5	0.81	0.38	2.6	35	88.6
Miami	59	37	22	74%	19.8	313	222.9	90	6.7	4.1	60	1.2	0.31	0.19	3.6	35	80.1
Minnesota	61	34	26	56%	24.4	344	214.2	130	6.7	4.9	60	1.2	0.75	0.38	2.8	36	76
New England	69	39	29	60%	27.8	385	255.4	129	6.9	4.4	61	0.7	0.75	0.44	2.5	38	87.3
New Orleans	65	41	24	68%	25.9	399	307.4	92.1	7.9	3.8	69	0.8	0.13	0.06	2.3	44	104.5
NY Giants	59	35	24	63%	18.4	308	224.3	83.3	6.8	3.5	57	1.8	1.00	0.63	2.5	33	67.6
NY Jets	61	30	31	55%	18.1	318	183.3	135	6.8	4.4	55	1.4	0.50	0.19	2.9	39	66.6
Oakland	60	32	27	61%	20.1	334	208.8	125	7	4.6	57	1.3	0.56	0.38	2.8	35	73.9
Philadelphia	63	32	31	55%	27.6	417	256.9	160	8.7	5.1	61	0.6	0.50	0.25	2.9	39	102.7
Pittsburgh	61	37	25	66%	23.7	338	251.1	86.4	7.3	3.5	64	0.9	0.56	0.31	2.7	38	92.3
San Diego	64	34	30	62%	24.8	393	270.5	123	8.2	4	70	0.7	0.56	0.44	1.9	49	105.5
San Francisco	58	26	32	52%	25.4	324	186.2	138	7.7	4.4	59	0.5	0.63	0.38	2.4	37	91.7
Seattle	58	26	32	52%	26.1	339	202.3	137	8.4	4.3	64	0.6	0.63	0.19	2.8	37	102.4
St. Louis	58	32	27	59%	21.8	305	195.3	110	6.6	4.1	60	0.7	0.56	0.44	2.3	34	84.8
Tampa Bay	58	32	26	58%	18	277	176.3	101	6.2	3.8	57	0.8	0.44	0.13	2.9	31	79.6
Tennessee	62	33	29	55%	22.6	337	218.5	118	7	4.1	62	1.0	0.75	0.19	2.3	41	83.6
Washington	67	38	28	60%	20.9	370	234.4	135	6.6	4.8	58	1.2	1.00	0.56	2.7	40	76.1

[Oraeon1224]

PASS RUSH AND PASS BLOCK TESTING


Surprising results: I ran same offensive play with 5 blockers against 4, 5, 6 man defensive pressure while I controlled QB with no movement and measured time until touched (not tackled) with stopwatch.

4 man rush					5 man rush
SETTING	Mean	Median	Missed block		SETTING	Mean	Med	Blow by %
10	3.81	3.45	10%		10	3.68	3.55	20%
20	3.18	3.4	30%		20	3.49	3.5	40%
30	3.36	3.25	20%		30	3.7	3.5	20%
40	3.64	3.35	20%		40	3.49	3.45	20%
50	3.58	3.4	30%		50	3.26	3.25	40%
60	3.37	3.05	30%		60	3.68	3.75	20%
70	3.84	3.7	20%		70	3.35	3.4	20%
80	3.82	3.4	20%		80	3.45	3.45	30%
90	3.39	3.45	20%		90	3.82	4.1	20%

6 man rush always unblocked 2.3-2.4 seconds to contact


Findings: Player blocking slider seemed to have very little effect on anything but CPU defenders being knocked down (didn't record numbers but was noticeably different). I was very surprised by this as in past years there was a huge difference. I am not sure this slider is working at all. Of note I didn't test during play action...maybe it helps there.


I also tried to test CPU pass blocking to see if it could adjust CPU sacks. There is no good statistical data to provide. I ran 4 man and 5 man rush and 6 man rush against 5 man offensive blockers with and without playaction enough plays to equate to the passes in a typical NFL game (see NFL stat charts). There were no sacks when set above 60 but I couldn't tell a difference between 10-50 with all groups getting between 2-3 sacks per game. The main reason was fairly obvious though. In my 6man blitz player test time to hit the QB is 2.3-2.4 sec. The CPU quarterback throws the short route at around 2.4 seconds into the play. This means even against a 6 man front there will never be a sack unless the receiver gets jammed/covered. It appears sacks are more related to coverage than sliders though perhaps settings of 50 or less due increase the odds (though Player testing didn't support this).


Recommendation: No clue what to recommend if too few sacks try lowering CPU Pass block to <50 but suspect pass coverage adjustments are more effective. Of note make sure you don't run a lot of 4 man fronts sine they are highly unlikely to get sacks (no CPU pressure in time).


EUREKA:
Results: I figured out how EA porked pass block. I ran human control against the CPU with adjustment to CPU pass block slider. It has a significant effect on the outcome of the square or x button push to beat the OL when playing as a human. Unfortunately by linking the slider to that they porked its use to control sacks since it doesn't appear to effect AI vs AI OL interactions.

Pass block	Beat block	No beat block
100	6	9
0	10	5

[Oraeon1224]

RUN BLOCKING/TACKLING/FUMBLING TESTING


TACKLING: I ran 25 plays (NFL usually about 23-24) with each slider set to calculate broken tackles (BTK) per game with NFL 3-5 per game (football outsiders) I shot for 5 per game as target.


Slider BTK
0 13
20 11
25 9
30 6
31 7
32 5
33 4
34 4
35 6
40 4

I feel 30-32 is a good place to start since I only ran one play shooting for 5-6 is good target. I'll start at 31 even though it had 7 I think that is a fluke and it is in the middle.


For RUN BLOCKING: I ran 24 plays with 4 and 5 man rush. YPC goal for starter is 4-5YPC, TFL for NFL was 3-4, I wanted no more than 1TD

SLIDER	YPC	TFL	TD
0	3.8	8	1
20	4.8	5	1
40	5.1	5	1
50	5.2	5	1
54	3.8	6	0
55	4.8	4	1
56	5.5	4	1
60	7.5	3	2
80	9.3	2	2

Conclusion: 55-59 seems best to minimize TFL, 60 had too many touchdowns. For now will use 56 which I tested.


FUMBLE TESTING: Will have to wait to in game at 0 had 3 fumbles, at 20 had 1 fumble, at 30 and above no fumbles. I suspect fatigue has something to do with this. I was trying to get slightly less than one fumble a game. Will set to 30 for Human and CPU for now.

[Oraeon1224]

QB ACCURACY/WR CATCH/DEFENSIVE COVERAGE TESTING


PASS COVERAGE SLIDER MAN DEFENSE RESULTS: Same play mix med and long routes, QB acc 23, All others at 50, shotgun 4 rushers to reduce sacks man.

Setting	0	20	50	80	100
Sacks	0
Defl	2	2	1	2	1
Int	2	3		1	3
Comp	25	26	30	26	27
Incomp	4	4	3	4	2
Drops	7	5	6	7	7
Total	40	40	40	40	40
T Incom	15	14	10	14	13
T Comp	25	26	30	26	27
Comp%	63%	65%	75%	65%	68%

Results: I have to test zone effects but appears useless for man coverage. I couldn't subjectively even tell a difference.


PASS REACTION SLIDER MAN RESULTS: Same as above again not on zone.

Setting	0	50	100
Sacks
Defl	1	1	1
Int	1		1
Comp	29	30	29
Incomp	3	3	3
Drops	6	6	6
Total	40	40	40
T Incom	11	10	11
T Comp	29	30	29
Comp%	73%	75%	73%

Results: Doesn't subjectively or objectively effect man defense needs zone testing maybe tomorrow. I will also test player in future with observations on different routes.


COVERAGE SLIDER AGAINST ZONE:

COVERAGE-ZONE
Setting	0	10	50	90	100
Sacks	6	3	9	10	12
Defl	2	3	3	4	3
Int	0	2	1	0	0
Comp	24	28	26	23	18
Deep	4	6	1	2	4
Incomp	7	4	1	3	7
Drops	1	0	0	0	0
Total	40	40	40	40	40
T Incom	10	9	5	7	10
T Comp	24	28	26	23	18
Comp%	71%	76%	84%	77%	64%

Results: Interestingly there are no drops in zone since there are no big hits. I could tell a difference in how tightly the zones were played subjectively. This was supported by the increased number of deep passes and the lower number of sacks as this slider approached 0. It is also interesting how many sacks occur from zone coverage compared to man with the same pass rush of front 4 (coverage sacks). Reducing pass coverage slider is key to reducing sacks in this game and opening up the deep game against the zone. I will likely start with this at 10 and increase if more sacks are needed. I will try to control Comp% with WR drops (not realistic) and QB ACC sliders. I will confirm what is happening with my player slider test later this week.

REACTION-ZONE
Setting	0	10	90	100
Sacks	3	1	2	5
Defl		3	5	4
Int	3	3	0	0
Comp	26	28	26	26
Deep	4	8	11	7
Incomp	7	5	5	4
Drops	1	0	2	1
Total	40	40	40	40
T Incom	11	11	12	9
T Comp	26	28	26	26
Comp%	70%	72%	68%	74%

Results: There was a subjective difference in deep pass coverage with Safety making a play on the ball aggressively when set to 0 or 10 but not at 90 or 100. In fact at 90 or 100 the pass was either overthrown, caught, or barely deflected. I played with the Interception slider after this test and it has no impact on play on the ball, it does effect how often the Safety drops the ball.


REACTION TIME EFFECTS ON PLAYACTION, DRAWS ETC...
Results: Not much to publish there was no impact on response to these play in practice mode. However, you don't have the down situation. In PS3 NCAA this slider did effect this but for now would say it effects reaction of zone players when the ball is in the air.

PLAYER COVERAGE MAN					PLAYER REACTION MAN
Setting	0	50	100		Setting	0	50	100
Vert	2	1	1		Vert	0	1	1
Post	7	4	0		Post	2	4	5
Out	8	8	0		Out	8	8	8
Hook	4	2	1		Hook	4	2	4
Slant	7	5	3		Slant	6	5	8
Drag	4	3	3		Drag	3	3	4
Blown	32	23	8		Open	23	23	30
Blown%	53.3%	38.3%	13.3%		Covered	38.3%	38.3%	50.0%

Results: This was extremely illuminating. While focusing on the defender with routes you can see that lowering pass coverage increases the number of blown coverages. This is visually represented by defensive players getting turned around or facing the wrong way and giving the receiver a big gap. It is likely a quirk of the play I called or the computer AI that I didn't see a difference for CPU quarterbacks as it is really obvious when watching it yourself. Post, out and Slant result in players getting turned around. Unfortunately for those who want more deep plays the verticals were not effected since the AI didn't have to adjust to cuts (which is what this slider manages). Reaction was less impressive for blown coverages but still very obvious in the routes I bolded. Reaction doesn't effect blowing the response to the cut (which is why its results are more muted), but rather how quickly the defender accelerates afterward. This increases interceptions and recovery.


Summary: By decreasing pass coverage you make receivers get open on short routes more often due to defenders stumbling. The Pass reaction slider can be used to reduce or increase interceptions and deflections and limit yards after the catch.
--Recommendation: Decrease pass coverage significantly to reduce sacks, reduce pass reaction to decrease interceptions and deflections for now, if with changes too few interceptions/deflections will increase, also if too many YAC increase slider. Neither one helps vertical routes (likely threshold settings). To reduce QB % consider adjusting QB slider (not tested yet) or decrease WR catch (ugh makes bad stats for WR).

THRESHOLD: VERTICAL ROUTES TY HILTON
Setting	0	100
COMP	0	3
INC	2	1
DEFL	10	10
INT	3	1

Results: I don't think 100 really gave more completions there was no difference in separation. However there is obvious separation with TE vs LB. However, this will likely tend to aggravate the CPU dink and dunk passing since it ensures short routes are open. Personally I will leave this alone as it may jack up some of the interactions of players. I may use a stopwatch and try to get real NFL LB vs HB speeds later.

QB ACC CPU MAN	0	50	100
Comp	12	13	22
Incomp	13	7	5
Drops	3	2
Int		1	1
Defl	4	6
Sack	8	11	12
Scrambles	2	1	4
Deep throw	1	4	2
Med throw	19	15	13
Short throw	10	7	8
Total	40	40	40
Total passes	32	29	28
Comp%	37.5%	44.8%	78.6%
Short %	31.3%	24.1%	28.6%
Med %	59.4%	51.7%	46.4%
Deep %	3.1%	13.8%	7.1%

With pass coverage and Pass reaction set to 50 and 50 I got the above. There is no meaningful difference in pass selection but there was a significant difference in completion %. Saw no difference in arm strength which is good. Next I will test putting all sliders together to create more realistic AI gameplay on offense.

[Oraeon1224]

Developing PASSING SLIDERS FOR THE CPU:

QB TUNING	A	B	C	D
Comp	20	19	14	21
Incomp	11	9	9	6
Drops	1	2	5	1
Int		1		1
Defl	1	2	5	4
Sack	9	12	9	13
Scrambles	2	7	6	6
Deep throw	1	1	2	3
Med throw	20	17	18	17
Short throw	9	10	10	11
Total	42	45	42	46
Total passes	33	33	33	33
Comp%	60.6%	57.6%	42.4%	63.6%
Short %	27.3%	30.3%	30.3%	33.3%
Med %	60.6%	51.5%	54.5%	51.5%
Deep %	3.0%	3.0%	6.1%	9.1%

A. QB ACC 10, WR DRP 43, INT 27, Pass react 90, Pass cover 10: Need 3-4 more deflections 1 more interception 2 more drops
B. QB ACC 10, WR DRP 40, INT 35, Pass react 70, Pass cover 10, INT better, no imrpovement in Defl Drops still to low
C. QB ACC 10, WR DRP 35, INT 35, Pass react 60, Pass cover 10; too many drops right deflection, not enough INT
D. QB ACC 12, WR DRP 38, INT 40, Pass react 60, Pass cover 10, Incomp better but too few drops


Results: Getting very good practice results for Defl, INT, Drops, Incomplete. More importantly it shows that the slider concept works. Will now begin using in game to evaluate further.

[Oraeon1224]

Penalty sliders:
Defensive pass interference: 0, 50, 100 had no effect on WR being open during player testing
Offensive pass interference: 0, 50, 100 had no effect on WR being open during player testing


THRESHOLD INFORMATION (Colt Example):
QB SPEED: 83, ACC 87
HB SPD: 88,90, ACC 90,91
WR SPD: 86, 96, 87, ACC 87, 97, 85
TE SPD: 73,86, ACC 83, 86
OLB SPD: 76, 88 ACC 85, 94
CB SPD: 93,92,91, ACC 94,87,92
Safety SPD: 91,86, ACC 87,83

[tommycoa]

Quote: Originally Posted by Oraeon1224

NFL STATS (2013 by ESPN) TEAM DEF PTS ALLOW/G DEF YD ALLOW/G DEF PASS YD ALL/G DEF RUSH YD ALL/G DEF SACKS/G DEF INT/G DEF FF DEF FUM REC/G DEF PASS DEFL PENALTY GAME PENALTY YD/G PUNT YD FG% Arizona 20.3 317.4 233 84.4 2.9 1.3 0.69 0.63 6.0 6 47 41.6 83.3 Atlanta 27.7 379.4 243.6 135.8 2.0 0.6 0.81 0.69 3.6 6 49 41.6 88.9 Baltimore 22 335.5 230.1 105.4 2.5 1.0 0.88 0.44 5.9 7 59 40.9 92.7 Buffalo 24.3 333.4 204.4 128.9 3.6 1.4 0.75 0.38 5.6 7 60 38 91.7 Carolina 15.1 301.3 214.3 86.9 3.8 1.3 0.69 0.63 4.0 5 42 43 88.9 Chicago 29.9 394.6 233.1 161.4 1.9 1.2 1.31 0.56 3.9 5 44 38.4 89.7 Cincinnati 19.1 305.5 209 96.5 2.7 1.3 0.81 0.69 5.6 6 63 41 81.8 Cleveland 25.4 332.4 221.1 111.3 2.5 0.9 0.56 0.44 4.9 7 58 39 80.8 Dallas 27 415.3 286.8 128.5 2.1 0.9 0.81 0.81 4.0 6 54 40.6 93.3 Denver 24.9 356 254.4 101.6 2.6 1.1 1.13 0.56 5.8 7 63 39.7 96.2 Detroit 23.5 346.6 246.9 99.8 2.1 0.9 0.88 0.44 5.3 7 58 43.1 79.2 Green Bay 26.8 372.3 247.3 125 2.8 0.7 1.19 0.69 4.1 5 50 40.5 89.2 Houston 26.8 317.6 195.2 122.4 2.0 0.4 0.75 0.25 4.2 7 71 41.6 74.3 Indianapolis 21 357.1 231.9 125.1 2.6 0.9 1.44 0.75 4.5 4 36 40.3 87.5 Jacksonville 28.1 379.4 247.6 131.8 1.9 0.7 1.00 0.63 4.4 6 50 42.2 92 Kansas City 19.1 367.8 247.6 120.2 2.9 1.3 0.88 0.94 6.0 6 48 42.6 78.6 Miami 20.9 359.4 234.5 124.9 2.6 1.1 0.75 0.38 4.8 4 37 44 76.5 Minnesota 30 397.6 287.2 110.4 2.6 0.8 0.81 0.50 3.7 4 43 40 86.7 New England 21.1 373.1 239 134.1 3.0 1.1 0.69 0.75 4.6 4 39 42.9 92.7 New Orleans 19 305.7 194.1 111.6 3.1 0.8 1.00 0.44 4.1 6 51 43.9 75 NY Giants 23.9 332.3 223.3 108.9 2.1 1.1 1.06 0.75 4.9 6 49 39.7 88.5 NY Jets 24.2 334.9 246.7 88.3 2.6 0.8 0.69 0.13 3.8 7 52 39.7 91.7 Oakland 28.3 363.7 255.8 107.9 2.4 0.6 1.31 0.81 2.5 7 57 42.7 70 Philadelphia 23.9 394 289.8 104.3 2.3 1.2 0.94 0.75 5.8 6 53 41.7 82.1 Pittsburgh 23.1 337.6 222.1 115.6 2.1 0.6 1.19 0.63 4.4 5 42 37 93.8 San Diego 21.8 366.5 258.7 107.8 2.2 0.7 0.81 0.38 3.9 6 48 40.3 91.9 San Francisco 17 316.9 221 95.9 2.4 1.1 0.81 0.69 5.0 6 53 44 88.9 Seattle 14.4 273.6 172 101.6 2.8 1.8 1.25 0.69 5.3 8 74 40.5 94.3 St. Louis 22.8 345 242.1 102.9 3.3 0.9 1.50 0.94 4.4 8 63 45.3 92.9 Tampa Bay 24.3 348 237.9 110.1 2.2 1.3 1.06 0.63 4.3 8 71 39.7 79.3 Tennessee 23.8 337.9 225.8 112.2 2.3 0.8 1.00 0.75 5.2 6 56 40.2 86.2 Washington 29.9 354.1 243.5 110.6 2.3 1.0 0.75 0.56 3.6 6 50 33.8 80.8 TEAM OFF PLAY/G OFF PASS ATT/G OFF RUSH ATT/G PASS CALL 1st OFF PTS/G OFF YD/G OFF PASS YD/G OFF RUSH YD/G OFF PASS YD/ATT OFF RUSH YD/ATT OFF PASS COMP% OFF PASS INT/G OFF FUM/G OFF FUML/G OFF SACKS ALLOW 3rd Conv (%) QB rating Arizona 62 36 26 62% 23.7 346 250.1 96.3 7.5 3.6 63 1.4 0.63 0.38 2.6 35 83.9 Atlanta 61 41 20 69% 22.1 343 265.2 77.9 6.9 3.9 68 1.1 0.56 0.38 2.8 43 89.5 Baltimore 65 39 26 64% 20 307 224.4 83 6.3 3.1 59 1.4 0.19 0.13 3.0 36 72 Buffalo 67 33 34 50% 21.2 338 193.9 144 6.5 4.2 57 0.9 1.06 0.44 3.0 34 75 Carolina 60 30 30 53% 22.9 317 190.2 127 7.1 4.2 62 0.8 0.38 0.13 2.7 44 88.8 Chicago 61 36 25 63% 27.8 382 267.6 114 7.7 4.5 64 0.8 0.56 0.31 1.9 42 96.9 Cincinnati 67 37 30 62% 26.9 368 258.5 110 7.4 3.6 62 1.3 0.81 0.44 1.8 41 89 Cleveland 64 43 22 66% 19.3 339 252.9 86.4 6.4 4 56 1.3 0.25 0.19 3.1 35 75.7 Dallas 58 37 21 66% 27.4 341 247.1 94 7.2 4.5 64 0.8 0.81 0.31 2.2 35 95.7 Denver 71 42 29 67% 37.9 457 340.3 117 8.3 4.1 68 0.6 0.88 0.50 1.3 46 114.4 Detroit 67 40 28 63% 24.7 392 280.1 112 7.3 4 59 1.2 1.44 0.81 1.4 43 84.2 Green Bay 64 36 29 57% 26.1 400 266.8 134 8 4.7 64 1.0 0.63 0.31 2.8 41 91.7 Houston 65 40 26 64% 17.3 347 238.3 109 6.6 4.2 59 1.4 0.63 0.38 2.6 36 74 Indianapolis 62 36 26 60% 24.4 342 232.8 109 6.8 4.3 60 0.6 0.31 0.06 2.0 38 86.5 Jacksonville 61 37 24 65% 15.4 294 215.1 78.8 6.3 3.3 59 1.3 0.69 0.38 3.1 31 71.8 Kansas City 62 34 28 55% 26.9 337 208.8 129 6.5 4.7 61 0.5 0.81 0.38 2.6 35 88.6 Miami 59 37 22 74% 19.8 313 222.9 90 6.7 4.1 60 1.2 0.31 0.19 3.6 35 80.1 Minnesota 61 34 26 56% 24.4 344 214.2 130 6.7 4.9 60 1.2 0.75 0.38 2.8 36 76 New England 69 39 29 60% 27.8 385 255.4 129 6.9 4.4 61 0.7 0.75 0.44 2.5 38 87.3 New Orleans 65 41 24 68% 25.9 399 307.4 92.1 7.9 3.8 69 0.8 0.13 0.06 2.3 44 104.5 NY Giants 59 35 24 63% 18.4 308 224.3 83.3 6.8 3.5 57 1.8 1.00 0.63 2.5 33 67.6 NY Jets 61 30 31 55% 18.1 318 183.3 135 6.8 4.4 55 1.4 0.50 0.19 2.9 39 66.6 Oakland 60 32 27 61% 20.1 334 208.8 125 7 4.6 57 1.3 0.56 0.38 2.8 35 73.9 Philadelphia 63 32 31 55% 27.6 417 256.9 160 8.7 5.1 61 0.6 0.50 0.25 2.9 39 102.7 Pittsburgh 61 37 25 66% 23.7 338 251.1 86.4 7.3 3.5 64 0.9 0.56 0.31 2.7 38 92.3 San Diego 64 34 30 62% 24.8 393 270.5 123 8.2 4 70 0.7 0.56 0.44 1.9 49 105.5 San Francisco 58 26 32 52% 25.4 324 186.2 138 7.7 4.4 59 0.5 0.63 0.38 2.4 37 91.7 Seattle 58 26 32 52% 26.1 339 202.3 137 8.4 4.3 64 0.6 0.63 0.19 2.8 37 102.4 St. Louis 58 32 27 59% 21.8 305 195.3 110 6.6 4.1 60 0.7 0.56 0.44 2.3 34 84.8 Tampa Bay 58 32 26 58% 18 277 176.3 101 6.2 3.8 57 0.8 0.44 0.13 2.9 31 79.6 Tennessee 62 33 29 55% 22.6 337 218.5 118 7 4.1 62 1.0 0.75 0.19 2.3 41 83.6 Washington 67 38 28 60% 20.9 370 234.4 135 6.6 4.8 58 1.2 1.00 0.56 2.7 40 76.1

Glad to see you on Madden. You've done great work in the past with NCAA. Can't wait for your findings. Just a heads up, I've been using tackle at 0 for both sides and like the results.