More Links

MurkMurda · 09-13-2012, 01:05 PM

As a big offline/ online Association player I've had issues with the way players progress. They give everyone set potential grades and set amounts of points they gain in each attribute at the end of a season no matter how they've produced. I look at Austin Rivers who is rated a 67 Ronnie already said he will have A+ potential which in 2k only raised you 5 points max without going to a camp. If you are able to put up big numbers with him a 72 overall the next season shouldnt be his rating cap. He is just an example though because there are plenty players I'm sure will be good in the game with low potential ratings.

Just wondering if 2k will ever address this... Wasn't a fan of the pre-determined rating boosts in Madden glad they got rid of it now its time for 2k to get a new system.

RedSceptile · 09-13-2012, 01:13 PM

Highly doubt it. The system needs a major overhaul and to be far more dynamic really.

Colts18 · 09-13-2012, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedSceptile


	Highly doubt it. The system needs a major overhaul and to be far more dynamic really.

Of course not. That means the 2K Insider would have to actually edit potential ratings. Not happening.

FedExPope · 09-13-2012, 04:10 PM

No, really, I liked having Tyrus Thomas be more dominant on the boards than Dwight Howard in year 2 of association...

TUSS11 · 09-13-2012, 04:31 PM

IMO the potential ratings themselves are not the problem. It's the fact that they don't fluctuate that's the problem.

Look at Kwame Brown. His potential was the reason he was drafted first overall. After improving in his first three years his progression flat-lined. In the 2K realm, he probably would have had a 90 potential rating in his rookie season. That rating would have declined after each disappointing season.

kjjnesb · 09-13-2012, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FedExPope


	No, really, I liked having Tyrus Thomas be more dominant on the boards than Dwight Howard in year 2 of association...

While getting paid the max lol...

MurkMurda · 09-13-2012, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FedExPope


	No, really, I liked having Tyrus Thomas be more dominant on the boards than Dwight Howard in year 2 of association...

Tyrus is one of those "2k allstars" Dude has been so ****ty for like 2-3 years

RivaGe · 09-14-2012, 12:44 AM

I'd be glad if they fixed big men 3 pt tendencies rising constantly. Such BS.

09-13-2012, 01:05 PM	#1
MurkMurda Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Dec 2011	Think Progression of Players in 2K Have Been Addressed? As a big offline/ online Association player I've had issues with the way players progress. They give everyone set potential grades and set amounts of points they gain in each attribute at the end of a season no matter how they've produced. I look at Austin Rivers who is rated a 67 Ronnie already said he will have A+ potential which in 2k only raised you 5 points max without going to a camp. If you are able to put up big numbers with him a 72 overall the next season shouldnt be his rating cap. He is just an example though because there are plenty players I'm sure will be good in the game with low potential ratings. Just wondering if 2k will ever address this... Wasn't a fan of the pre-determined rating boosts in Madden glad they got rid of it now its time for 2k to get a new system. ffaacc03, TUSS11 and Knickerbocker like this. __________________ Bloodsport 13 Madden Commish Bloodsport Madden Football League (PS3) - www.Maddendaddy.com/BS13 Twitter : @ItzGotti

09-13-2012, 01:13 PM	#2
RedSceptile MVP OVR: 17 Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Okinawa, Japan	Re: Think Progression of Players in 2K Have Been Addressed? Highly doubt it. The system needs a major overhaul and to be far more dynamic really.

09-13-2012, 04:10 PM	#4
FedExPope Pro OVR: 7 Join Date: Aug 2009 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Think Progression of Players in 2K Have Been Addressed? No, really, I liked having Tyrus Thomas be more dominant on the boards than Dwight Howard in year 2 of association...

09-13-2012, 04:31 PM	#5
TUSS11 MVP OVR: 12 Join Date: Nov 2007	Re: Think Progression of Players in 2K Have Been Addressed? IMO the potential ratings themselves are not the problem. It's the fact that they don't fluctuate that's the problem. Look at Kwame Brown. His potential was the reason he was drafted first overall. After improving in his first three years his progression flat-lined. In the 2K realm, he probably would have had a 90 potential rating in his rookie season. That rating would have declined after each disappointing season. 2k10Fonzarelli and Danbo80 like this.

09-14-2012, 12:44 AM	#8
RivaGe Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Sep 2011	Re: Think Progression of Players in 2K Have Been Addressed? I'd be glad if they fixed big men 3 pt tendencies rising constantly. Such BS.

	College Football 25 All-In-One Recruiting Guide: Do This, Not That
	Madden 25 Review: Stalling in the Red Zone
	Good AI in Football Games Is Way Too Rare

More Links

Think Progression of Players in 2K Have Been Addressed?