More Links

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:14 PM

Difficulty: Heisman (can't get CPU d to work this year on AA)
Speed threshold: 60 (Shortens speed gap between LB and WR to more real value)
Game speed: Normal
Quarter length: 9-11 minutes (Goal 130-150 plays total per game, about 65-70 per team; realistic plays per game not minutes is the ONLY way to get realistic statistics; I use 10)

Slider: Human/CPU
QB accuracy: 15/15 (some overthrown deep balls, EA please have separate slider)
Pass blocking: 70/70 (stops DT sacks, as opposes power move)
WR catching: 45/45 (goal 3-4 drops per game for an A/B team)
RB ability: 50/50
Run blocking: 50/50 (pancakes fixed at 55 but unbalanced)
Pass coverage: 50/100 (Goal 3-4 deflections per game; setting higher for human leads to coverage sacks)
Pass rush: 70/70 (Makes DE get most sacks not DT, as boost finesse move)
Interceptions: 35/35 (goal of 1-2 per game)
Rush defense: 60/60 (45 or lower helps CPU option, debating lower rb and decrease this)
Tackling: 25/25 (goal of 3-6 broken tackles, NCAA avg 4.5/game)
FG power: 50/50
FG accuracy: 35/35 (CPU is not broken at <35 only human)
Punting power: 40/50 (goal about 40yd avg per game)
Punting accuracy: 50/50
Kickoff power: 50/50
Penalties:
Offside: 70
False start: 70
Holding: 54
Facemask:56
Off PI:100 (never seen one)
Def PI:100 (never seen one, substituting facemask)
KR/PR Interf: 100 (never seen one)
Clipping:100 (nerfed this year still haven't seen)
Intent grounding:100 (never seen)
Roughing passer: 54 (this gives one against the CPU per game; you will get called if you control pass rush--I control a LB, lower slider if you control pass rush to 60-70)
Roughing kicker: 100 (never seen)

Autosubs (Sub out/Sub in):
Not tested any suggestions warranted seems broken like every year for the past 5 years.

Coaching sliders: See below they are less powerful than last year but may help. Certainly effect simulation.

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:17 PM

Bill Parcell NFL combine stats for players: Helps judge performance in this game.

Spoiler

The difference between LB average (4.68) and WR times (4.48) is 0.20 seconds and RB (4.49) is 0.19 seconds. I would expect college defenses to be relatively slower since that is the main change between pro and college for quarterbacks (defensive speed). So a college LB might be 5% worse that is 4.91 40 time which is a gap of 0.43 seconds.>>

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:19 PM

NCAA stastics for every team: Remember teams schedules are padded so expect worse statistics against good teams. Later I may post good team stats which are available.

Offensive statistics:

Spoiler

Name	Games	Plays per game	Yards/G	Rush Att/G	Rush YD/game	Rush YPC	Off Allowed TFL/G	Fum/G	Fumb lost/G	Pass Att/G	Pass Pct. (%)	Pass Yd/Game	Pass Yd/Att	Off INT/G	Yards/Play	Sacks Allowed/G	3rd down Convers (%)	Penalty YD/G	Punts/G	Punt Avg. YD	1st half rush Att/G	% Rush Att 1st half	1st half Pass Att/G	% Pass Att 1st half
Air Force	13	71	454.8	56	315	5.7	5.0	2.3	1.4	16	60	140	8.9	0.6	6.4	0.8	47.0	43.2	2.9	39	29	77%	9	23%
Akron	12	66	277.8	34	114	3.3	6.9	1.8	1.1	31	46	163	5.2	0.9	4.2	3.1	27.8	43.6	7.0	38	20	58%	14	42%
Alabama	13	67	429.6	39	214	5.5	5.5	0.9	0.3	28	66	215	7.8	0.6	6.5	1.3	46.4	28.4	3.0	39	18	50%	18	50%
Arizona	12	76	464.8	28	95	3.4	5.9	1.3	0.5	48	69	370	7.7	1.3	6.1	1.9	43.3	65.1	3.6	44	14	37%	24	63%
Arizona State	13	73	445.8	33	129	4.0	6.1	1.5	0.8	41	63	317	7.8	1.0	6.1	2.2	38.8	79.8	4.8	41	16	43%	21	57%
Arkansas	13	68	438.1	32	137	4.3	6.5	2.0	1.0	36	64	301	8.3	0.5	6.5	2.2	42.4	45.6	4.1	45	15	42%	21	58%
Arkansas State	13	78	447.8	40	154	3.9	5.8	1.1	0.8	39	65	294	7.6	1.2	5.7	2.1	42.1	60.4	4.0	38	18	47%	20	53%
Army	12	70	396.9	62	347	5.6	3.7	3.0	1.8	8	38	50	6.2	0.3	5.7	0.9	45.6	36.3	3.1	38	31	90%	3	10%
Auburn	13	64	337.8	41	182	4.4	7.5	1.3	0.6	23	56	156	6.9	1.0	5.3	2.5	35.7	52	5.6	41	20	62%	12	38%
Ball State	12	72	379.4	33	138	4.2	3.9	0.8	0.6	38	64	241	6.3	0.9	5.3	0.9	40.9	35.5	5.7	42	16	44%	20	56%
Baylor	13	77	587.1	44	236	5.3	4.8	2.5	1.4	33	72	351	10.8	0.5	7.6	2.2	45.3	64.5	2.5	40	23	54%	19	46%
Boise State	13	75	481.3	38	172	4.5	4.4	1.5	0.6	37	74	309	8.4	0.8	6.5	0.6	51.2	47.2	3.5	42	17	43%	23	57%
Boston College	12	63	300.3	36	131	3.6	5.5	1.2	0.8	27	53	169	6.3	0.8	4.7	2.0	37.4	35.5	5.8	38	19	60%	13	40%
Bowling Green	12	69	384.3	34	123	3.7	6.2	1.8	1.2	36	59	262	7.3	1.2	5.6	1.9	36.0	42.1	4.8	45	16	45%	20	55%
Buffalo	12	72	365.2	36	155	4.3	5.7	1.2	0.5	35	56	210	6.0	0.8	5.1	1.8	34.1	53.6	5.9	38	17	49%	18	51%
BYU	13	74	405.7	38	160	4.2	4.3	1.5	0.9	36	57	245	6.9	1.2	5.5	1.3	51.3	50.2	3.6	42	18	48%	20	52%
California	13	71	401.5	37	155	4.2	5.7	2.2	0.9	34	56	247	7.3	0.9	5.7	2.2	40.6	72.4	4.2	43	19	52%	18	48%
Central Michigan	12	66	389.9	28	116	4.2	4.8	1.4	0.4	38	56	274	7.2	1.5	5.9	1.4	35.4	46.7	5.5	39	14	40%	20	60%
Cincinnati	13	69	386.2	38	179	4.6	6.5	1.7	0.5	30	57	208	6.9	1.1	5.6	1.7	37.7	46.7	4.9	44	19	53%	17	47%
Clemson	14	75	440.8	38	159	4.2	6.1	1.6	0.9	38	59	282	7.5	0.9	5.9	2.4	43.3	40.1	4.8	42	18	48%	20	52%
Colorado	13	65	346.3	31	109	3.5	5.8	1.4	0.6	35	56	238	6.9	0.8	5.3	2.4	36.0	66.6	5.9	41	14	43%	19	57%
Colorado State	12	66	351.3	38	167	4.4	7.1	1.8	1.0	29	61	185	6.4	1.2	5.3	2.9	34.2	60.8	4.8	44	18	57%	14	43%
Connecticut	12	69	313.2	39	119	3.1	7.2	2.0	1.2	30	51	195	6.5	0.8	4.6	3.4	28.3	41.8	6.7	41	21	61%	14	39%
Duke	12	72	366.3	30	94	3.1	5.8	1.3	0.8	41	64	272	6.6	1.0	5.1	1.5	39.2	38.9	4.3	41	12	38%	20	62%
East Carolina	12	77	395.2	33	109	3.3	6.5	1.9	1.3	44	68	286	6.6	1.7	5.2	2.5	46.1	45.8	4.3	39	16	41%	22	59%
Eastern Michigan	12	65	345.0	48	218	4.6	7.1	1.3	0.8	17	55	127	7.5	0.7	5.3	1.5	40.3	61.2	5.4	39	24	73%	9	27%
Florida	13	61	328.7	36	143	4.0	7.4	2.2	1.0	25	57	186	7.5	1.0	5.4	1.8	32.1	59.5	4.4	40	18	53%	16	47%
Florida Atlantic	12	62	248.8	32	106	3.3	6.8	2.3	0.9	29	52	143	4.9	1.3	4.0	2.8	28.7	68.2	6.6	40	16	52%	15	48%
Florida International	13	67	360.5	37	146	4.0	5.1	1.6	0.8	30	61	215	7.2	0.4	5.4	1.2	37.2	65.8	5.5	39	18	52%	16	48%
Florida State	13	63	369.2	34	112	3.3	6.4	1.5	0.5	30	65	257	8.7	0.9	5.9	3.1	38.3	67.3	4.4	47	16	52%	15	48%
Fresno State	13	68	411.8	34	139	4.1	4.7	2.1	1.0	35	62	273	7.9	0.8	6.0	1.5	37.4	62.2	5.2	39	17	48%	18	52%
Georgia	14	73	408.5	42	164	4.0	6.6	2.0	0.8	31	59	245	7.9	1.0	5.6	2.4	42.7	47.4	4.2	43	20	54%	17	46%
Georgia Tech	13	68	458.7	55	316	5.7	4.5	2.4	0.8	13	49	142	11.1	0.6	6.8	1.0	53.9	36.9	3.1	39	26	79%	7	21%
Hawai'i	13	69	404.2	23	95	4.1	6.3	2.2	1.2	46	60	309	6.7	0.8	5.8	3.2	44.6	45.9	4.4	39	10	30%	24	70%
Houston	14	79	599.1	30	149	5.0	3.9	0.9	0.6	49	70	450	9.2	0.4	7.6	1.3	50.7	51.4	3.7	40	16	41%	24	59%
Idaho	12	68	301.5	33	113	3.5	5.7	1.4	0.8	35	53	188	5.4	1.3	4.5	2.3	29.2	59.5	7.4	46	16	47%	18	53%
Illinois	13	70	355.7	42	172	4.1	6.9	2.2	1.2	28	62	184	6.6	1.0	5.1	2.8	42.3	42.2	5.6	38	20	62%	12	38%
Indiana	12	73	360.4	41	161	3.9	7.5	1.1	0.6	32	56	199	6.3	0.9	5.0	2.6	40.8	64.7	5.9	38	22	59%	15	41%
Iowa	13	67	372.5	35	138	4.0	4.6	1.4	0.8	32	58	235	7.4	0.6	5.6	2.2	40.0	35.6	4.1	41	19	55%	16	45%
Iowa State	13	79	386.5	41	174	4.2	6.8	2.4	1.4	37	51	212	5.7	1.3	4.9	1.9	40.3	52.3	5.3	42	20	53%	18	47%
Kansas	12	70	326.8	45	160	3.5	7.2	2.3	0.9	25	64	167	6.7	1.0	4.7	2.6	38.8	45.9	5.3	43	23	62%	14	38%
Kansas State	13	69	337.0	47	185	4.0	7.9	1.8	0.7	22	58	152	6.8	0.5	4.9	3.3	42.1	35.8	5.3	40	21	63%	12	37%
Kent State	12	65	253.2	36	108	3.0	6.1	1.3	0.8	29	49	145	5.0	0.8	3.9	2.5	28.8	64	7.1	42	19	59%	13	41%
Kentucky	12	64	259.8	36	124	3.5	7.4	1.8	1.0	28	51	136	4.8	1.0	4.1	2.9	29.0	40.2	6.7	43	17	52%	15	48%
Louisiana Tech	13	76	394.6	39	148	3.8	6.0	1.3	0.7	37	58	247	6.7	0.8	5.2	1.9	36.9	61.2	6.6	45	18	46%	21	54%
Louisiana-Lafayette	13	69	394.6	35	125	3.6	6.0	1.9	1.0	34	61	269	8.0	0.8	5.7	1.9	38.7	66.1	6.2	40	18	54%	15	46%
Louisiana-Monroe	12	78	390.6	39	153	3.9	6.8	1.3	0.7	39	58	238	6.0	0.8	5.0	2.9	41.5	50	5.7	36	18	48%	19	52%
Louisville	13	65	333.0	36	122	3.4	7.5	1.0	0.7	29	64	211	7.2	1.0	5.1	3.2	39.4	56.5	5.5	37	17	55%	14	45%
LSU	14	62	355.1	42	203	4.8	4.5	1.4	0.4	20	62	153	7.7	0.4	5.7	1.3	44.7	50.1	4.8	43	17	58%	12	42%
Marshall	13	66	333.4	34	120	3.5	6.2	1.2	0.9	31	60	213	6.8	1.2	5.1	2.1	36.1	41.8	5.9	40	17	51%	16	49%
Maryland	12	71	379.7	35	169	4.8	4.3	1.7	0.6	36	54	210	5.8	1.3	5.3	1.4	35.6	36.2	5.1	39	17	50%	17	50%
Memphis	12	66	274.3	32	84	2.7	7.0	1.8	0.8	34	55	190	5.6	0.7	4.2	2.3	30.4	43.6	8.0	42	17	50%	17	50%
Miami (Florida)	12	61	377.8	33	146	4.4	4.9	1.4	0.7	28	66	232	8.2	0.9	6.2	1.6	42.6	42.3	4.0	43	16	52%	15	48%
Miami (Ohio)	12	70	372.9	31	74	2.4	6.7	1.2	0.8	38	66	299	7.8	0.9	5.4	3.9	40.9	45.9	5.9	37	17	46%	19	54%
Michigan	13	65	404.7	43	222	5.2	5.9	1.5	0.5	22	55	183	8.4	1.2	6.2	1.4	47.0	35.2	3.5	38	21	64%	12	36%
Michigan State	14	67	390.4	35	138	4.0	5.1	1.4	0.6	32	64	253	7.8	0.7	5.8	1.2	38.6	55.4	4.6	41	16	50%	16	50%
Middle Tennessee	12	78	401.1	36	146	4.1	5.6	1.8	1.1	42	59	255	6.0	1.3	5.1	0.8	40.6	42.6	5.4	40	18	48%	20	52%
Minnesota	12	62	310.3	39	160	4.1	5.0	1.5	0.6	23	49	150	6.6	0.8	5.0	1.8	38.1	49.4	4.9	37	20	65%	10	35%
Mississippi	12	64	280.8	38	129	3.4	9.0	1.6	1.0	26	49	152	5.8	1.1	4.4	2.6	33.0	57.7	6.0	44	20	63%	11	37%
Mississippi State	13	66	357.2	39	175	4.4	6.6	1.6	0.5	27	57	182	6.8	1.0	5.4	1.9	38.7	43.6	5.5	42	21	60%	14	40%
Missouri	13	75	475.5	45	243	5.4	6.5	1.2	0.6	30	64	232	7.9	0.8	6.4	1.4	39.9	45.6	4.9	44	23	62%	14	38%
Navy	12	69	398.0	58	312	5.4	5.5	1.5	0.8	11	48	86	7.6	0.5	5.8	1.2	47.4	20	3.0	37	29	85%	5	15%
Nebraska	13	70	379.9	47	217	4.6	5.4	2.5	0.8	23	56	163	7.2	0.6	5.5	1.6	42.3	52.9	4.6	44	22	63%	13	37%
Nevada	13	80	506.7	48	248	5.1	5.9	2.1	1.0	32	66	259	8.2	0.9	6.4	1.3	45.8	56.5	4.5	40	24	59%	17	41%
New Mexico	12	63	296.2	34	113	3.4	5.6	2.0	1.1	30	57	183	6.2	0.7	4.7	2.5	30.6	48.5	6.3	39	17	53%	15	47%
New Mexico State	13	69	398.1	34	125	3.6	5.5	1.9	0.8	35	55	273	7.9	1.1	5.8	2.6	39.6	52.4	5.8	39	17	48%	19	52%
North Carolina	13	63	393.2	34	139	4.1	5.7	1.9	0.9	29	67	254	8.9	1.1	6.3	2.1	40.5	47.9	4.8	37	16	52%	15	48%
North Carolina State	13	70	344.8	34	105	3.0	5.6	1.8	1.0	36	62	240	6.7	0.9	4.9	2.5	43.3	33.8	5.3	37	17	48%	18	52%
North Texas	12	69	341.8	40	152	3.8	5.3	1.3	0.7	29	57	189	6.5	0.8	5.0	1.3	37.8	41.4	6.2	43	21	61%	13	39%
Northern Illinois	14	72	476.0	43	234	5.5	5.0	1.4	0.9	29	62	242	8.3	0.4	6.6	0.9	44.2	53.4	4.4	36	21	57%	16	43%
Northwestern	13	76	420.8	44	167	3.8	6.3	1.2	0.6	31	71	254	8.1	0.7	5.6	3.2	47.9	37.8	4.0	41	22	56%	17	44%
Notre Dame	13	70	413.0	33	160	4.8	4.8	1.7	0.9	36	64	253	6.9	1.3	5.9	1.3	46.6	59.1	4.3	39	18	48%	19	52%
Ohio	14	73	445.4	43	196	4.6	6.1	1.9	1.1	31	64	249	8.2	0.8	6.1	1.7	47.6	59.4	4.0	39	19	52%	18	48%
Ohio State	13	62	317.9	43	191	4.4	6.9	1.6	0.8	19	51	127	6.7	0.4	5.1	3.5	38.7	44	5.5	40	22	71%	9	29%
Oklahoma	13	81	512.3	36	163	4.5	4.4	1.3	1.0	45	63	349	7.8	1.2	6.3	0.9	41.8	44.8	4.8	42	17	39%	27	61%
Oklahoma State	13	76	549.8	30	163	5.4	4.1	1.2	0.8	46	72	387	8.5	1.0	7.2	0.9	48.9	50.5	3.8	45	14	34%	26	66%
Oregon	14	73	522.8	45	299	6.7	5.3	1.7	0.9	28	61	224	8.1	0.5	7.2	0.9	45.1	65	3.5	45	19	52%	18	48%
Oregon State	12	68	373.5	27	87	3.3	5.5	2.2	1.0	42	64	287	6.8	1.6	5.5	2.3	40.1	68.7	4.2	44	13	40%	20	60%
Penn State	13	69	342.4	40	165	4.2	3.8	2.4	1.0	29	48	177	6.1	0.9	5.0	1.1	36.3	43.5	5.6	41	18	54%	16	46%
Pittsburgh	13	73	350.1	40	141	3.5	8.5	1.9	0.6	33	62	209	6.4	1.1	4.8	4.9	33.7	39.5	5.6	39	21	56%	17	44%
Purdue	13	71	376.8	41	182	4.4	6.8	1.6	0.7	30	60	195	6.5	0.8	5.3	2.2	40.3	60.2	5.4	39	21	55%	17	45%
Rice	12	71	347.7	39	151	3.9	7.3	1.8	1.0	32	58	197	6.1	0.6	4.9	1.8	37.0	38.4	6.7	43	20	53%	18	47%
Rutgers	13	72	339.0	35	98	2.8	6.4	1.6	0.9	37	54	241	6.6	1.2	4.7	2.3	36.6	44.7	4.9	40	19	50%	18	50%
San Diego State	13	72	427.4	37	184	4.9	4.5	1.2	0.6	35	53	243	7.0	0.6	5.9	0.9	45.0	41.1	4.7	44	19	53%	17	47%
San Jose State	12	70	378.7	30	102	3.4	4.3	2.0	1.4	40	62	277	6.9	1.3	5.4	1.4	39.4	31.5	4.3	43	15	44%	20	56%
SMU	13	64	388.6	27	114	4.2	5.5	1.7	1.0	37	59	275	7.5	1.5	6.1	2.3	40.5	50.5	4.4	37	13	40%	19	60%
South Carolina	13	67	373.5	43	192	4.5	5.3	2.0	0.9	24	60	181	7.4	1.2	5.6	2.3	43.1	48.6	4.1	38	20	58%	14	42%
South Florida	12	76	431.7	40	182	4.6	5.3	1.8	1.1	36	58	250	6.9	0.9	5.7	1.3	40.0	60.1	5.3	36	20	53%	18	47%
Southern Mississippi	14	74	461.4	40	205	5.2	5.1	1.8	1.3	35	60	256	7.3	0.9	6.2	1.2	41.8	63.9	4.1	43	17	49%	18	51%
Stanford	13	72	489.3	40	211	5.3	3.2	1.0	0.5	32	71	279	8.7	0.8	6.8	0.9	52.6	55.2	2.8	41	19	53%	17	47%
Syracuse	12	68	348.2	33	120	3.7	5.2	1.2	0.8	35	62	228	6.5	0.8	5.1	2.4	42.4	62.8	5.3	39	15	48%	16	52%
TCU	13	68	440.2	41	209	5.1	3.7	2.0	1.1	27	66	232	8.6	0.5	6.5	1.0	52.1	52.8	3.7	40	18	55%	15	45%
Temple	13	64	383.2	49	256	5.2	5.0	1.4	0.6	15	59	127	8.3	0.3	6.0	1.6	46.3	43.1	3.7	45	25	76%	8	24%
Tennessee	12	66	332.7	33	90	2.8	5.2	2.2	0.5	33	56	243	7.3	1.0	5.0	1.5	40.9	46.8	4.7	36	17	48%	18	52%
Texas	13	73	392.5	45	203	4.5	5.9	1.5	0.8	28	58	190	6.9	1.2	5.4	2.2	43.7	55.5	5.0	38	22	59%	15	41%
Texas A&M	13	80	490.2	39	199	5.1	4.9	1.4	0.7	41	62	291	7.1	1.2	6.1	0.7	46.3	65.8	4.2	41	18	46%	21	54%
Texas Tech	12	83	470.6	33	125	3.8	5.3	1.6	0.7	50	68	345	6.9	0.8	5.7	1.6	48.2	64.8	4.8	42	16	37%	28	63%
Toledo	13	75	481.3	43	214	5.0	5.1	1.1	0.5	33	69	268	8.2	0.5	6.4	0.8	47.9	63.2	4.7	37	19	50%	19	50%
Troy	12	72	380.0	28	89	3.2	4.9	2.1	1.3	44	63	291	6.6	1.3	5.3	1.7	38.8	53	5.9	40	14	40%	21	60%
Tulane	13	68	340.3	33	126	3.8	5.5	1.4	0.8	36	54	214	6.0	1.2	5.0	1.7	38.0	49.8	5.8	40	18	49%	18	51%
Tulsa	13	72	440.4	40	193	4.8	5.2	1.8	1.2	32	61	247	7.7	1.3	6.1	1.4	41.7	35.8	4.7	39	19	52%	17	48%
UAB	12	70	364.0	34	129	3.9	4.4	1.8	0.9	37	56	235	6.4	1.3	5.2	1.6	40.4	43.6	4.8	40	17	48%	18	52%
UCF	12	68	406.8	39	169	4.4	5.6	1.4	0.8	29	68	238	8.3	0.7	6.0	2.1	44.3	48.9	3.5	41	23	61%	15	39%
UCLA	14	64	376.6	39	178	4.5	5.8	2.3	1.2	25	56	198	8.0	0.6	5.9	2.1	36.7	59	4.6	44	19	63%	11	37%
UNLV	12	64	273.8	42	164	3.9	6.8	1.6	0.6	22	54	110	4.9	0.8	4.3	2.9	28.0	61.2	6.5	40	23	66%	12	34%
USC	12	70	456.8	33	163	5.0	4.3	1.5	0.9	37	69	294	7.9	0.6	6.5	0.7	48.0	50	3.3	40	15	40%	22	60%
Utah	13	62	310.9	36	138	3.8	6.5	2.2	1.0	26	56	173	6.7	0.8	5.0	2.5	33.5	51.7	5.5	43	16	56%	13	44%
Utah State	13	70	457.3	48	283	5.9	5.2	2.1	1.4	22	64	175	7.8	0.5	6.5	1.4	48.4	60.2	4.5	44	21	64%	12	36%
UTEP	12	67	380.5	34	155	4.5	6.3	1.7	0.8	33	56	226	6.8	1.4	5.6	2.8	38.9	41	4.0	46	16	51%	16	49%
Vanderbilt	13	65	339.1	38	164	4.3	7.2	1.6	0.8	27	52	175	6.6	1.4	5.2	2.2	34.1	50.2	5.3	41	20	59%	14	41%
Virginia	13	72	399.8	38	162	4.3	5.9	1.8	0.9	34	58	238	7.0	1.2	5.5	1.2	40.9	42.3	5.1	37	19	52%	18	48%
Virginia Tech	14	71	413.0	42	187	4.4	6.5	1.7	0.6	29	60	226	7.8	0.7	5.8	1.2	45.9	53.2	4.4	37	20	56%	16	44%
Wake Forest	13	71	367.8	36	115	3.2	7.5	1.2	0.3	35	61	253	7.2	0.6	5.2	2.7	35.5	43.5	5.5	39	19	50%	19	50%
Washington	13	66	409.8	35	154	4.4	6.0	1.0	0.7	31	66	256	8.2	1.0	6.2	2.6	45.9	59.5	4.0	43	18	51%	17	49%
Washington State	12	74	424.3	33	102	3.1	6.3	1.9	0.8	41	60	322	7.9	1.0	5.8	3.2	41.7	63.2	4.8	39	18	47%	20	53%
West Virginia	13	74	469.5	32	123	3.8	6.2	2.1	1.0	42	65	347	8.3	0.7	6.4	2.0	40.6	53.6	4.3	38	16	41%	23	59%
Western Kentucky	12	70	348.9	45	182	4.0	5.9	1.3	0.8	25	56	167	6.7	1.1	5.0	1.8	43.3	62.3	5.3	42	23	63%	13	37%
Western Michigan	13	73	458.5	30	121	4.0	5.4	2.0	1.4	43	67	337	7.9	1.2	6.3	1.7	42.6	56.2	3.3	41	14	37%	24	63%
Wisconsin	14	67	469.9	44	236	5.4	4.6	0.6	0.4	23	71	234	10.0	0.4	7.0	1.8	54.7	38.9	3.4	40	22	61%	14	39%
Wyoming	13	70	388.5	37	182	4.9	5.5	1.5	0.6	33	61	207	6.3	0.8	5.5	0.9	42.9	47.1	5.8	40	19	52%	17	48%

Defensive statistics:

Spoiler

Name	G	Opp Rush Yd/game	Opp Pass Yd/game	Opp Pl/game	Opp Yards Play	Opp Yards/G	Def Sacks/game	Def TFL/G	Fumbles Forced/G	Int./G	Defl /G	Opp 3rd down (%)
Air Force	13	220	167	68	5.7	387	1.4	4.2	1.1	0.9	1.8	50.3
Akron	12	219	208	70	6.1	427	0.8	3.6	0.8	0.2	2.3	44.3
Alabama	13	72	111	55	3.3	184	2.3	7.4	0.8	1.0	4.3	24.5
Arizona	12	162	299	70	6.6	461	0.8	4.6	0.9	0.9	3.8	41.6
Arizona State	13	150	273	70	6.1	423	1.9	5.8	1.4	1.2	3.3	34.9
Arkansas	13	168	195	70	5.2	363	2.2	5.9	0.8	0.9	2.8	36.7
Arkansas State	13	104	228	71	4.7	332	2.7	7.6	1.2	1.5	4.3	35.2
Army	12	195	164	61	5.9	359	1.5	4.4	0.6	0.7	1.8	48.6
Auburn	13	189	219	71	5.7	408	1.7	5.7	1.3	0.9	2.8	48.4
Ball State	12	226	284	75	6.8	510	1.3	4.4	0.8	0.8	2.5	52.9
Baylor	13	197	291	76	6.4	489	1.5	4.8	0.9	1.2	3.8	49.8
Boise State	13	110	211	62	5.2	321	1.9	6.2	1.4	1.2	3.2	29.8
Boston College	12	151	243	70	5.6	394	0.7	4.5	0.5	1.1	3.3	40.8
Bowling Green	12	203	203	72	5.7	406	1.8	5.3	0.9	0.5	2.8	36.8
Buffalo	12	181	204	69	5.6	385	1.4	5.8	0.8	0.5	3.3	40.8
BYU	13	112	201	64	4.9	313	1.8	5.9	1.1	1.0	4.3	37.0
California	13	129	204	65	5.2	333	2.5	7.6	0.7	0.9	3.8	35.4
Central Michigan	12	187	242	72	5.9	429	1.1	4.8	0.3	0.7	2.5	45.6
Cincinnati	13	95	261	72	4.9	356	3.5	8.6	1.5	1.2	4.0	32.5
Clemson	14	177	218	70	5.6	394	1.7	5.1	0.8	1.0	3.6	41.0
Colorado	13	184	255	67	6.6	439	2.2	5.2	0.8	0.5	2.3	46.8
Colorado State	12	234	180	67	6.2	413	2.2	4.3	1.3	0.7	2.6	43.0
Connecticut	12	86	281	68	5.4	367	2.8	7.3	0.8	1.5	4.5	32.6
Duke	12	181	245	65	6.6	425	1.3	4.3	0.8	0.5	3.4	43.0
East Carolina	12	174	202	68	5.6	376	1.9	4.6	1.0	0.6	3.0	41.6
Eastern Michigan	12	141	210	65	5.4	350	1.9	5.8	0.8	0.4	3.6	31.5
Florida	13	133	167	65	4.6	300	2.2	7.2	0.9	0.6	2.8	27.1
Florida Atlantic	12	169	223	73	5.3	392	1.4	6.3	0.9	0.8	1.8	48.4
Florida International	13	118	227	71	4.9	345	2.6	6.8	0.5	1.1	3.7	36.2
Florida State	13	83	192	66	4.2	275	3.2	7.6	0.6	1.2	4.2	34.9
Fresno State	13	168	268	68	6.4	436	1.7	5.4	1.0	0.4	3.4	43.4
Georgia	14	101	176	62	4.5	277	2.5	7.1	1.2	1.4	3.9	28.9
Georgia Tech	13	161	198	65	5.5	359	1.7	4.8	1.0	1.1	3.6	42.4
Hawai'i	13	142	245	69	5.6	387	2.7	5.7	1.5	1.1	4.0	38.7
Houston	14	172	209	75	5.1	380	2.2	7.7	0.9	1.5	4.4	37.8
Idaho	12	159	278	75	5.9	437	1.4	5.3	1.3	0.8	2.8	37.7
Illinois	13	124	162	65	4.4	286	3.2	7.9	1.3	0.8	3.2	34.6
Indiana	12	244	215	71	6.4	459	1.5	5.0	1.0	0.4	2.6	49.1
Iowa	13	156	223	74	5.1	379	1.6	4.8	0.9	0.8	3.0	45.9
Iowa State	13	193	234	75	5.7	428	1.3	4.3	1.1	0.9	3.5	36.8
Kansas	12	239	278	72	7.2	516	0.8	4.2	1.1	0.7	2.7	51.3
Kansas State	13	131	263	70	5.7	395	1.7	4.9	0.7	1.4	3.5	39.8
Kent State	12	128	196	67	4.8	325	2.2	7.3	1.5	1.2	3.3	34.5
Kentucky	12	183	194	69	5.5	377	1.7	5.3	0.8	1.3	3.1	39.7
Louisiana Tech	13	127	249	77	4.9	377	2.5	6.0	0.8	1.6	4.2	32.1
Louisiana-Lafayette	13	139	261	74	5.4	400	2.2	6.9	0.8	1.1	3.5	38.2
Louisiana-Monroe	12	100	226	67	4.9	326	2.2	5.8	0.5	1.1	2.2	40.9
Louisville	13	101	227	66	5.0	328	2.5	7.1	1.1	0.8	2.6	38.1
LSU	14	90	171	64	4.1	262	2.7	7.6	1.2	1.3	4.1	34.0
Marshall	13	150	255	72	5.7	405	2.1	7.9	1.3	1.1	3.5	38.2
Maryland	12	220	237	78	5.9	457	2.1	6.3	1.2	0.9	2.5	53.8
Memphis	12	192	299	74	6.6	491	1.2	5.5	1.5	1.0	2.4	46.1
Miami (Florida)	12	162	198	66	5.5	360	2.0	6.2	1.0	0.5	2.0	41.1
Miami (Ohio)	12	169	195	69	5.3	364	2.1	7.2	0.7	0.8	3.1	37.2
Michigan	13	132	190	62	5.2	322	2.3	5.5	1.2	0.7	2.7	36.4
Michigan State	14	101	177	65	4.3	277	3.2	7.6	0.9	1.3	3.0	33.7
Middle Tennessee	12	230	212	77	5.8	441	1.5	5.9	1.1	0.3	1.9	49.0
Minnesota	12	186	217	68	6.0	403	1.6	5.0	0.7	0.3	2.3	44.0
Mississippi	12	225	194	67	6.2	419	1.1	4.8	0.6	0.8	2.5	40.9
Mississippi State	13	153	197	75	4.7	351	2.1	6.9	1.2	0.9	3.0	36.5
Missouri	13	127	253	73	5.2	380	2.1	7.0	1.1	1.0	3.9	41.2
Navy	12	187	227	68	6.1	414	1.0	4.2	1.2	0.8	2.3	51.4
Nebraska	13	158	192	67	5.2	351	1.6	4.3	0.5	0.8	3.3	40.2
Nevada	13	147	222	67	5.5	369	1.9	4.7	0.6	1.2	4.2	36.2
New Mexico	12	247	245	73	6.7	492	0.8	4.3	1.3	0.3	2.2	57.2
New Mexico State	13	219	243	74	6.2	462	1.2	4.2	0.8	0.8	3.2	45.7
North Carolina	13	124	241	70	5.2	365	1.9	6.5	1.0	1.1	3.8	44.9
North Carolina State	13	131	224	67	5.3	355	3.1	6.9	1.5	2.1	2.7	38.8
North Texas	12	164	266	71	6.1	429	2.2	5.4	1.2	0.8	3.3	42.9
Northern Illinois	14	167	248	76	5.5	415	2.0	6.7	0.6	0.9	3.9	38.0
Northwestern	13	177	232	67	6.1	410	1.3	4.5	0.6	0.9	2.3	50.0
Notre Dame	13	139	205	68	5.1	344	1.9	5.4	0.6	0.6	3.2	34.1
Ohio	14	142	219	69	5.2	361	1.4	5.7	0.9	1.1	4.3	41.2
Ohio State	13	142	182	64	5.1	324	1.8	5.1	0.8	1.0	3.1	40.2
Oklahoma	13	135	241	73	5.2	376	3.1	7.5	1.0	1.2	5.2	30.6
Oklahoma State	13	185	272	84	5.5	457	2.3	7.1	1.4	1.9	4.8	41.8
Oregon	14	143	247	77	5.1	390	3.2	6.7	1.1	1.2	5.3	38.9
Oregon State	12	197	214	70	5.9	411	2.0	4.3	1.0	0.9	3.3	47.4
Penn State	13	133	191	70	4.6	324	2.4	6.5	0.9	1.1	4.5	38.4
Pittsburgh	13	117	234	70	5.0	351	3.3	7.5	0.9	0.6	3.6	32.8
Purdue	13	175	221	72	5.5	396	1.7	6.5	0.9	0.9	3.2	41.0
Rice	12	183	279	71	6.5	462	1.8	5.4	0.9	1.1	3.7	40.5
Rutgers	13	140	172	64	4.9	312	2.8	7.5	1.2	1.5	3.2	31.9
San Diego State	13	170	222	69	5.7	391	2.2	6.5	1.3	1.2	3.8	45.5
San Jose State	12	204	221	70	6.1	426	1.3	4.7	1.3	1.1	2.6	43.2
SMU	13	118	222	70	4.9	340	2.5	5.5	1.1	0.5	3.7	38.8
South Carolina	13	136	132	64	4.2	268	2.4	6.8	1.1	1.5	2.5	35.3
South Florida	12	107	245	73	4.8	352	3.2	8.1	1.3	1.0	3.6	35.5
Southern Mississippi	14	119	224	74	4.6	343	2.0	7.5	1.0	1.4	5.4	35.5
Stanford	13	88	253	63	5.5	342	3.0	6.9	1.4	0.5	3.7	31.1
Syracuse	12	128	258	71	5.5	386	2.3	6.7	0.9	0.8	2.3	41.6
TCU	13	124	224	67	5.2	347	1.9	5.7	1.2	0.8	3.4	37.5
Temple	13	124	188	64	4.9	312	2.5	5.7	1.0	1.2	2.8	33.9
Tennessee	12	163	178	63	5.4	341	1.3	5.6	0.8	0.8	2.3	38.9
Texas	13	96	210	67	4.6	306	2.2	7.4	1.2	0.9	5.8	33.7
Texas A&M	13	102	276	78	4.8	378	3.9	8.0	1.2	0.5	4.2	40.4
Texas Tech	12	259	227	75	6.5	486	1.3	5.9	1.8	0.4	2.6	47.1
Toledo	13	133	269	69	5.8	402	1.8	6.0	1.5	1.1	4.2	35.4
Troy	12	204	261	77	6.0	465	1.6	4.8	0.9	0.7	2.2	42.5
Tulane	13	165	245	68	6.0	410	2.1	5.0	1.1	0.9	3.7	43.3
Tulsa	13	128	286	79	5.3	415	2.1	5.5	1.0	1.4	4.5	42.3
UAB	12	203	282	72	6.7	486	0.7	3.8	1.3	0.8	1.8	46.5
UCF	12	109	195	61	5.0	303	1.4	5.4	0.7	0.8	4.6	31.6
UCLA	14	191	227	71	5.9	417	1.0	5.0	0.5	1.0	3.4	47.5
UNLV	12	194	249	69	6.5	443	1.2	4.9	1.3	0.6	2.8	49.7
USC	12	111	263	69	5.4	375	2.5	5.3	0.9	0.8	3.8	40.1
Utah	13	115	237	71	5.0	352	2.2	5.6	0.9	1.5	4.3	38.7
Utah State	13	128	238	73	5.0	366	1.9	5.9	0.7	0.3	3.5	35.4
UTEP	12	191	250	70	6.3	442	2.0	5.1	0.5	1.0	3.4	44.4
Vanderbilt	13	131	192	67	4.8	323	2.1	6.4	1.2	1.5	3.9	36.6
Virginia	13	139	212	67	5.3	352	1.5	6.9	0.9	0.9	3.9	33.3
Virginia Tech	14	104	201	62	4.9	305	2.9	6.6	0.6	1.1	3.6	32.3
Wake Forest	13	170	228	71	5.6	398	0.9	5.2	0.8	1.0	4.5	39.4
Washington	13	169	285	71	6.4	453	2.2	5.1	1.2	0.8	3.8	49.2
Washington State	12	157	252	66	6.3	410	1.4	5.0	1.0	0.7	2.8	42.7
West Virginia	13	145	203	71	4.9	348	2.4	6.2	0.7	1.1	3.2	35.8
Western Kentucky	12	134	239	64	5.9	374	2.3	6.6	0.6	1.1	4.3	35.5
Western Michigan	13	220	215	71	6.1	435	2.2	6.4	1.5	0.9	3.3	39.2
Wisconsin	14	153	164	61	5.2	316	1.8	6.1	1.3	1.1	2.9	38.0
Wyoming	13	232	200	71	6.1	432	1.7	4.4	1.3	1.0	2.9	41.4

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:20 PM

Speed threshold testing:

Finished testing threshold slider speed settings for WR and Defense (average for position at B class school):

WR NFL combine: 4.48 sec
OLB NFL combine: 4.65 sec
CB NFL combine: 4.47 sec
Safety NFL combine: 4.52 sec
Difference LB: 0.17 sec (0.2 with rounding)
Difference CB: -0.01 sec (0 with rounding)
Difference Safety: 0.04 sec

NCAA football on default threshold:
WR 4.4 sec
OLB 4.7 sec
CB 4.4 sec (close with 4.5 being real value)
Safety 4.5 sec
Difference LB : 0.3 sec
Difference CB: 0.0 sec
Difference Safety: 0.1 sec

It would appear on testing that compared to NFL players the gap between WR and defensive players is close but slightly favors WR. On testing WR vs LB (safety should middle out) with threshold at 60:

Threshold 60:
WR 4.4
LB 4.6
Difference 0.2 sec

I am currently happy with the results and will play with the slider on 60 currently.

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:21 PM

Pass block/Pass rush testing:

I tested thes liders by running 20 test with 10 point increment slider changes for both Pass rush and Pass blocking. This year I also investigated who got the sacks and what the sliders actually do:

No blitz (5 defenders vs 4 rush) results:
Pass block slider: At the default setting the QB has about 6 seconds to throw this year, but ranges from only 2 seconds to throw at a setting of 0 with 100% of tackles by the DT, to 8 seconds to throw at 100 with 90% of tackles being by the DE. On observation the pass block is effecting the power move statistic with bull rushes and flattened lineman at higher settings. This allows the DT with their shorter travel distance to predominate sacks. I would avoid overly aggressively changing this slider if you want DE to get sacks. The stated 5 second interval goal is reached with a setting of 40-45.

Pass rush slider: Default the same as above. It ranged from 7 seconds at a setting of 0 with 40% of sacks by DE to 5 seconds with 70% of sacks by DE at a setting of 100. It appears to affect the swim move and allows both DT and DE to beat their men with this move but appears to make DE more effective. This slider should be increased to improve sack figures by DE. It allows them to more quickly get off blocks and reach the quarterback but has a less noticable impact on DT.

Effect on pancakes: Neither slider appeared to have any impact on offensive lineman pancakes which were very rare (this is still hosed).

Blitzing: Multiple defenders were sent and sliders were assessed.
Pass block slider: If set to 100 DE and blitzers got the sacks if set lower DT or Blitzers got the sack. It appears the blitzer is picked up and the DT is poorly blocked allowing more DT sacks as the PB slider is decreased.

Pass rush slider: If set to 100 most sacks were by the DT while at 0 most sacks were by the DE and blitzer. It would appear that the blitzers generally rely on the swim move. And if doing well the AI focuses on them and lets the DT rush pass.

This testing shows that the Pass block slider effects the bull rush by DT primarily and the Pass rush slider effects blitzers and DE. Unfortunately blitzing appears to fritz the AI logic of this game which then focuses on blocking the blitzer and allows the DT with their shorter route to reach the quarterback. What I observed was the OL watching the blitzer and not starting off blocking a DT. If the game was reprogrammed (if possible) to have the OL assigned to the blitzer hold up the DT and then focus on the blitzer as they neared the line at the last minute this would fix this issue (Heads up if anyone reads this from EA).

Recommendation: Decrease pass block sparingly as it results in very unrealistic DT sacks. I would recommend Pass block slider at 45 as currently pass rush is weak and raise Pass rush slider to 70 (will have in game testing next week).

Cautions: Since the pass rush is weaker this year compared to my testing last year I suspect their new passing AI is partially dependent on the quarterback having excessive time to throw. I suspect the nerfed the pass rush to allow the reciever icons time to open rather than properly programming the AI to use its short dumpoff recievers (something the AI has never done in this game). If pass rush is adjusted it may break the game and result in excessive sacks. Incidentally this nerf and bad dumpoff AI may partially explain why the CPU seems to be so focused on the deep ball and screens. I have noted the AI always takes a deep pass if given too much time in the pocket.

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:22 PM

Run black/skill testing:Appears the same as last year so no changes though running appears more effective so will have to adjust after in game testing.

Run inside and outside testing:
Unfortunately testing was not possible for how much sliders change yardage here. The game seemed to have balanced inside and outside runs. It did seem to have a few too many TFL plays. However, by examining the extremes of the sliders I can now state what they do in general terms:

1) RB ability: Increases the RB speed and ability to break tackles and hit the correct hole. This slider improved yards per carry with some potential for big plays. It seemed to adjust yardage gained the best but at high levels the RB starts to look oddly fast. Probably my 1st choice adjustment for improving YPC.

2) Run blocking: Very interesting slider. It does almost nothing for YPC if you exclude touchdown runs. However, this slider has a huge impact on the quality of lineman blocking at the second level. At default you rarely see blockers getting to the second level consistently. At a slider of 100 they were consistently blocking downfield even to the level of the safety (a bit unrealistic though). Largely this downfield blocking is because they level their assigned defender and move on. Use this slider if you want to have imrpoved second level blocking and more big runs (i.e. TD runs). Be very cautious at 70 and above it resulted in >20% of runs being TD's; I personally wouldn't recommend using >60.

3) Run defense: Appears to effect the defenses ability to adjust to and correctly read the running play. This improves somewhat the YPC by allowing bigger gains but doesn't give up TD's like Run blocking sliders do. This would be my 2nd choice for imrpoving the run gain after RB ability and probably a tandem usage of both sliders would be best rather than overutilizing 1. Has its biggest impact on inside runs by improving YPC there

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:23 PM

WR catching slider:
I tested this slider this year by running 15 WR routes, 15 TE routes, and 5 HB routes for 10 increment decreases in the setting. I found this slider less effective than in previous years. Even at 0 about 50% of passes are caught. Fortunately this year the disproportionate impact on TE and HB appears diminished and it primary effects downfield passing. I found that a value between 30-40 is likely the best value for the correct number of drops per game--in game testing required. I also would like to remind readers that a drop requires a reciever to drop a clearly catchable ball without being plowed by a defender (i.e. it must be the recievers fault). Will start testing in game at 35.

QB accuracy slider:
I tested this slider for an easy to complete out route. Though there are no statistics I watched NCAA last year and noted about 4-6 terrible passes per game on average. WIth QB accuracy at 50 there were 4 bad passes, at 40 5 bad passes, at 30 6 bad passes, 20 10 bad passes, at 10 9 bad passes. The best value is likely between 30-40. Will start at 35 for QB accuracy and adjust human and CPU from in game testing.

Oraeon1224 · 07-10-2012, 03:23 PM

Coaching slider testing: I am a bit cautious if this works this year. However with it set to minimums and maximums I can tell some deference in play calling. To use this edit the coaching profile of the head coach offensive sliders. Here are the slider suggestions:

Name	1st half rush Att/G	% Rush Att 1st half	1st half Pass Att/G	% Pass Att 1st half	L slider number	R slider number
Air Force	29	77%	9	23%	23%	77%
Akron	20	58%	14	42%	42%	58%
Alabama	18	50%	18	50%	50%	50%
Arizona	14	37%	24	63%	63%	37%
Arizona State	16	43%	21	57%	57%	43%
Arkansas	15	42%	21	58%	58%	42%
Arkansas State	18	47%	20	53%	53%	47%
Army	31	90%	3	10%	10%	90%
Auburn	20	62%	12	38%	38%	62%
Ball State	16	44%	20	56%	56%	44%
Baylor	23	54%	19	46%	46%	54%
Boise State	17	43%	23	57%	57%	43%
Boston College	19	60%	13	40%	40%	60%
Bowling Green	16	45%	20	55%	55%	45%
Buffalo	17	49%	18	51%	51%	49%
BYU	18	48%	20	52%	52%	48%
California	19	52%	18	48%	48%	52%
Central Michigan	14	40%	20	60%	60%	40%
Cincinnati	19	53%	17	47%	47%	53%
Clemson	18	48%	20	52%	52%	48%
Colorado	14	43%	19	57%	57%	43%
Colorado State	18	57%	14	43%	43%	57%
Connecticut	21	61%	14	39%	39%	61%
Duke	12	38%	20	62%	62%	38%
East Carolina	16	41%	22	59%	59%	41%
Eastern Michigan	24	73%	9	27%	27%	73%
Florida	18	53%	16	47%	47%	53%
Florida Atlantic	16	52%	15	48%	48%	52%
Florida International	18	52%	16	48%	48%	52%
Florida State	16	52%	15	48%	48%	52%
Fresno State	17	48%	18	52%	52%	48%
Georgia	20	54%	17	46%	46%	54%
Georgia Tech	26	79%	7	21%	21%	79%
Hawai'i	10	30%	24	70%	70%	30%
Houston	16	41%	24	59%	59%	41%
Idaho	16	47%	18	53%	53%	47%
Illinois	20	62%	12	38%	38%	62%
Indiana	22	59%	15	41%	41%	59%
Iowa	19	55%	16	45%	45%	55%
Iowa State	20	53%	18	47%	47%	53%
Kansas	23	62%	14	38%	38%	62%
Kansas State	21	63%	12	37%	37%	63%
Kent State	19	59%	13	41%	41%	59%
Kentucky	17	52%	15	48%	48%	52%
Louisiana Tech	18	46%	21	54%	54%	46%
Louisiana-Lafayette	18	54%	15	46%	46%	54%
Louisiana-Monroe	18	48%	19	52%	52%	48%
Louisville	17	55%	14	45%	45%	55%
LSU	17	58%	12	42%	42%	58%
Marshall	17	51%	16	49%	49%	51%
Maryland	17	50%	17	50%	50%	50%
Memphis	17	50%	17	50%	50%	50%
Miami (Florida)	16	52%	15	48%	48%	52%
Miami (Ohio)	17	46%	19	54%	54%	46%
Michigan	21	64%	12	36%	36%	64%
Michigan State	16	50%	16	50%	50%	50%
Middle Tennessee	18	48%	20	52%	52%	48%
Minnesota	20	65%	10	35%	35%	65%
Mississippi	20	63%	11	37%	37%	63%
Mississippi State	21	60%	14	40%	40%	60%
Missouri	23	62%	14	38%	38%	62%
Navy	29	85%	5	15%	15%	85%
Nebraska	22	63%	13	37%	37%	63%
Nevada	24	59%	17	41%	41%	59%
New Mexico	17	53%	15	47%	47%	53%
New Mexico State	17	48%	19	52%	52%	48%
North Carolina	16	52%	15	48%	48%	52%
North Carolina State	17	48%	18	52%	52%	48%
North Texas	21	61%	13	39%	39%	61%
Northern Illinois	21	57%	16	43%	43%	57%
Northwestern	22	56%	17	44%	44%	56%
Notre Dame	18	48%	19	52%	52%	48%
Ohio	19	52%	18	48%	48%	52%
Ohio State	22	71%	9	29%	29%	71%
Oklahoma	17	39%	27	61%	61%	39%
Oklahoma State	14	34%	26	66%	66%	34%
Oregon	19	52%	18	48%	48%	52%
Oregon State	13	40%	20	60%	60%	40%
Penn State	18	54%	16	46%	46%	54%
Pittsburgh	21	56%	17	44%	44%	56%
Purdue	21	55%	17	45%	45%	55%
Rice	20	53%	18	47%	47%	53%
Rutgers	19	50%	18	50%	50%	50%
San Diego State	19	53%	17	47%	47%	53%
San Jose State	15	44%	20	56%	56%	44%
SMU	13	40%	19	60%	60%	40%
South Carolina	20	58%	14	42%	42%	58%
South Florida	20	53%	18	47%	47%	53%
Southern Mississippi	17	49%	18	51%	51%	49%
Stanford	19	53%	17	47%	47%	53%
Syracuse	15	48%	16	52%	52%	48%
TCU	18	55%	15	45%	45%	55%
Temple	25	76%	8	24%	24%	76%
Tennessee	17	48%	18	52%	52%	48%
Texas	22	59%	15	41%	41%	59%
Texas A&M	18	46%	21	54%	54%	46%
Texas Tech	16	37%	28	63%	63%	37%
Toledo	19	50%	19	50%	50%	50%
Troy	14	40%	21	60%	60%	40%
Tulane	18	49%	18	51%	51%	49%
Tulsa	19	52%	17	48%	48%	52%
UAB	17	48%	18	52%	52%	48%
UCF	23	61%	15	39%	39%	61%
UCLA	19	63%	11	37%	37%	63%
UNLV	23	66%	12	34%	34%	66%
USC	15	40%	22	60%	60%	40%
Utah	16	56%	13	44%	44%	56%
Utah State	21	64%	12	36%	36%	64%
UTEP	16	51%	16	49%	49%	51%
Vanderbilt	20	59%	14	41%	41%	59%
Virginia	19	52%	18	48%	48%	52%
Virginia Tech	20	56%	16	44%	44%	56%
Wake Forest	19	50%	19	50%	50%	50%
Washington	18	51%	17	49%	49%	51%
Washington State	18	47%	20	53%	53%	47%
West Virginia	16	41%	23	59%	59%	41%
Western Kentucky	23	63%	13	37%	37%	63%
Western Michigan	14	37%	24	63%	63%	37%
Wisconsin	22	61%	14	39%	39%	61%
Wyoming	19	52%	17	48%	48%	52%

07-10-2012, 03:14 PM	#1
Oraeon1224 Pro OVR: 6 Join Date: Jul 2008	Oraeon's Statistics in sliders for NCAA13 Difficulty: Heisman (can't get CPU d to work this year on AA) Speed threshold: 60 (Shortens speed gap between LB and WR to more real value) Game speed: Normal Quarter length: 9-11 minutes (Goal 130-150 plays total per game, about 65-70 per team; realistic plays per game not minutes is the ONLY way to get realistic statistics; I use 10) Slider: Human/CPU QB accuracy: 15/15 (some overthrown deep balls, EA please have separate slider) Pass blocking: 70/70 (stops DT sacks, as opposes power move) WR catching: 45/45 (goal 3-4 drops per game for an A/B team) RB ability: 50/50 Run blocking: 50/50 (pancakes fixed at 55 but unbalanced) Pass coverage: 50/100 (Goal 3-4 deflections per game; setting higher for human leads to coverage sacks) Pass rush: 70/70 (Makes DE get most sacks not DT, as boost finesse move) Interceptions: 35/35 (goal of 1-2 per game) Rush defense: 60/60 (45 or lower helps CPU option, debating lower rb and decrease this) Tackling: 25/25 (goal of 3-6 broken tackles, NCAA avg 4.5/game) FG power: 50/50 FG accuracy: 35/35 (CPU is not broken at <35 only human) Punting power: 40/50 (goal about 40yd avg per game) Punting accuracy: 50/50 Kickoff power: 50/50 Penalties: Offside: 70 False start: 70 Holding: 54 Facemask:56 Off PI:100 (never seen one) Def PI:100 (never seen one, substituting facemask) KR/PR Interf: 100 (never seen one) Clipping:100 (nerfed this year still haven't seen) Intent grounding:100 (never seen) Roughing passer: 54 (this gives one against the CPU per game; you will get called if you control pass rush--I control a LB, lower slider if you control pass rush to 60-70) Roughing kicker: 100 (never seen) Autosubs (Sub out/Sub in): Not tested any suggestions warranted seems broken like every year for the past 5 years. Coaching sliders: See below they are less powerful than last year but may help. Certainly effect simulation. CACNighthawk, petty43, Sundown2600 and 10 others like this. Last edited by Oraeon1224; 09-16-2012 at 03:00 PM.

07-10-2012, 03:20 PM	#4
Oraeon1224 Pro OVR: 6 Join Date: Jul 2008	Re: Oraeon's Statistics in sliders for NCAA13 Speed threshold testing: Finished testing threshold slider speed settings for WR and Defense (average for position at B class school): WR NFL combine: 4.48 sec OLB NFL combine: 4.65 sec CB NFL combine: 4.47 sec Safety NFL combine: 4.52 sec Difference LB: 0.17 sec (0.2 with rounding) Difference CB: -0.01 sec (0 with rounding) Difference Safety: 0.04 sec NCAA football on default threshold: WR 4.4 sec OLB 4.7 sec CB 4.4 sec (close with 4.5 being real value) Safety 4.5 sec Difference LB : 0.3 sec Difference CB: 0.0 sec Difference Safety: 0.1 sec It would appear on testing that compared to NFL players the gap between WR and defensive players is close but slightly favors WR. On testing WR vs LB (safety should middle out) with threshold at 60: Threshold 60: WR 4.4 LB 4.6 Difference 0.2 sec I am currently happy with the results and will play with the slider on 60 currently. Last edited by Oraeon1224; 07-10-2012 at 04:08 PM.

07-10-2012, 03:21 PM	#5
Oraeon1224 Pro OVR: 6 Join Date: Jul 2008	Re: Oraeon's Statistics in sliders for NCAA13 Pass block/Pass rush testing: I tested thes liders by running 20 test with 10 point increment slider changes for both Pass rush and Pass blocking. This year I also investigated who got the sacks and what the sliders actually do: No blitz (5 defenders vs 4 rush) results: Pass block slider: At the default setting the QB has about 6 seconds to throw this year, but ranges from only 2 seconds to throw at a setting of 0 with 100% of tackles by the DT, to 8 seconds to throw at 100 with 90% of tackles being by the DE. On observation the pass block is effecting the power move statistic with bull rushes and flattened lineman at higher settings. This allows the DT with their shorter travel distance to predominate sacks. I would avoid overly aggressively changing this slider if you want DE to get sacks. The stated 5 second interval goal is reached with a setting of 40-45. Pass rush slider: Default the same as above. It ranged from 7 seconds at a setting of 0 with 40% of sacks by DE to 5 seconds with 70% of sacks by DE at a setting of 100. It appears to affect the swim move and allows both DT and DE to beat their men with this move but appears to make DE more effective. This slider should be increased to improve sack figures by DE. It allows them to more quickly get off blocks and reach the quarterback but has a less noticable impact on DT. Effect on pancakes: Neither slider appeared to have any impact on offensive lineman pancakes which were very rare (this is still hosed). Blitzing: Multiple defenders were sent and sliders were assessed. Pass block slider: If set to 100 DE and blitzers got the sacks if set lower DT or Blitzers got the sack. It appears the blitzer is picked up and the DT is poorly blocked allowing more DT sacks as the PB slider is decreased. Pass rush slider: If set to 100 most sacks were by the DT while at 0 most sacks were by the DE and blitzer. It would appear that the blitzers generally rely on the swim move. And if doing well the AI focuses on them and lets the DT rush pass. This testing shows that the Pass block slider effects the bull rush by DT primarily and the Pass rush slider effects blitzers and DE. Unfortunately blitzing appears to fritz the AI logic of this game which then focuses on blocking the blitzer and allows the DT with their shorter route to reach the quarterback. What I observed was the OL watching the blitzer and not starting off blocking a DT. If the game was reprogrammed (if possible) to have the OL assigned to the blitzer hold up the DT and then focus on the blitzer as they neared the line at the last minute this would fix this issue (Heads up if anyone reads this from EA). Recommendation: Decrease pass block sparingly as it results in very unrealistic DT sacks. I would recommend Pass block slider at 45 as currently pass rush is weak and raise Pass rush slider to 70 (will have in game testing next week). Cautions: Since the pass rush is weaker this year compared to my testing last year I suspect their new passing AI is partially dependent on the quarterback having excessive time to throw. I suspect the nerfed the pass rush to allow the reciever icons time to open rather than properly programming the AI to use its short dumpoff recievers (something the AI has never done in this game). If pass rush is adjusted it may break the game and result in excessive sacks. Incidentally this nerf and bad dumpoff AI may partially explain why the CPU seems to be so focused on the deep ball and screens. I have noted the AI always takes a deep pass if given too much time in the pocket. Last edited by Oraeon1224; 07-10-2012 at 09:49 PM.

07-10-2012, 03:22 PM	#6
Oraeon1224 Pro OVR: 6 Join Date: Jul 2008	Re: Oraeon's Statistics in sliders for NCAA13 Run black/skill testing:Appears the same as last year so no changes though running appears more effective so will have to adjust after in game testing. Run inside and outside testing: Unfortunately testing was not possible for how much sliders change yardage here. The game seemed to have balanced inside and outside runs. It did seem to have a few too many TFL plays. However, by examining the extremes of the sliders I can now state what they do in general terms: 1) RB ability: Increases the RB speed and ability to break tackles and hit the correct hole. This slider improved yards per carry with some potential for big plays. It seemed to adjust yardage gained the best but at high levels the RB starts to look oddly fast. Probably my 1st choice adjustment for improving YPC. 2) Run blocking: Very interesting slider. It does almost nothing for YPC if you exclude touchdown runs. However, this slider has a huge impact on the quality of lineman blocking at the second level. At default you rarely see blockers getting to the second level consistently. At a slider of 100 they were consistently blocking downfield even to the level of the safety (a bit unrealistic though). Largely this downfield blocking is because they level their assigned defender and move on. Use this slider if you want to have imrpoved second level blocking and more big runs (i.e. TD runs). Be very cautious at 70 and above it resulted in >20% of runs being TD's; I personally wouldn't recommend using >60. 3) Run defense: Appears to effect the defenses ability to adjust to and correctly read the running play. This improves somewhat the YPC by allowing bigger gains but doesn't give up TD's like Run blocking sliders do. This would be my 2nd choice for imrpoving the run gain after RB ability and probably a tandem usage of both sliders would be best rather than overutilizing 1. Has its biggest impact on inside runs by improving YPC there nortobc likes this. Last edited by Oraeon1224; 07-11-2012 at 10:21 PM.

07-10-2012, 03:23 PM	#7
Oraeon1224 Pro OVR: 6 Join Date: Jul 2008	Re: Oraeon's Statistics in sliders for NCAA13 WR catching slider: I tested this slider this year by running 15 WR routes, 15 TE routes, and 5 HB routes for 10 increment decreases in the setting. I found this slider less effective than in previous years. Even at 0 about 50% of passes are caught. Fortunately this year the disproportionate impact on TE and HB appears diminished and it primary effects downfield passing. I found that a value between 30-40 is likely the best value for the correct number of drops per game--in game testing required. I also would like to remind readers that a drop requires a reciever to drop a clearly catchable ball without being plowed by a defender (i.e. it must be the recievers fault). Will start testing in game at 35. QB accuracy slider: I tested this slider for an easy to complete out route. Though there are no statistics I watched NCAA last year and noted about 4-6 terrible passes per game on average. WIth QB accuracy at 50 there were 4 bad passes, at 40 5 bad passes, at 30 6 bad passes, 20 10 bad passes, at 10 9 bad passes. The best value is likely between 30-40. Will start at 35 for QB accuracy and adjust human and CPU from in game testing. Last edited by Oraeon1224; 07-10-2012 at 10:46 PM.

	New OS Forums Are Coming on May 1
	The Best Sports Gaming Year of All-Time
	Arcade Sports Games Need a Revival

More Links

Oraeon's Statistics in sliders for NCAA13