What do you think of this trade?

[Kurt l o l]

I just traded T. Jackson, a 2012 1st and a 2013 1st for Matt Flynn, the future of the Seahawks...


Overpaid or under?

[Icy4me]

Over paid, Flynn is worth, Jackson, 2012 1st/2nd, and maybe a 3rd-4th 2013 pick.

[Kurt l o l]

I tried all of this but they wouldn't accept, I'm not playing 32 controlled btw.

[Icy4me]

Oh you most likely have to stay with that trade then.

[michael4786]

yeah i'm with icy, i wouldn't have given a 2013 1st rounder but whatever

[Kurt l o l]

I don't think the 1st round pick is too important for the 'Hawks anyway, they have one of the best secondarys, if not the best who are all young and great ballhawks, a good linebacker core and some nice pass rush from the DE's. The offence is pretty set now that I've got my QB, I'll just use the 2 round + picks for interior linemen now..

[37]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kurt l o l

I just traded T. Jackson, a 2012 1st and a 2013 1st for Matt Flynn, the future of the Seahawks... Overpaid or under?

Way overpaid

[pinksheets]

Was this during year 1 of franchise?

I'd have waited to see if he was a FA at the end of the season rather than that kind of overpay.

If you're looking for a realistic view of things, though:

1) TJack wouldn't be a part of the trade. He might be cut from Seattle as a result of it, but the Pack would have no interest in him and would look to draft another QB to groom.

2) If the Pack did resign him and we're in year 2, it's safe to act like this is similar to them franchising him to get some compensation, and no more than a 1st would be warranted in exchange. Big time overpay.

What is Flynn rated/what's his potential at this point? He was like an 82/B with the last roster update I downloaded (probably mid-seasonish), so I'm surprised a 1st alone doesn't get it done.