EVERY TEAMS DECADE RECORD AND WINNING PERCENTAGE.....(2001-2010)

[SlickRick11]

RANKING EVERY TEAM BY THEIR WINNING PERCENTAGE OVER THE LAST DECADE..... (2001-2010)

BOISE ST. 114-16 (.876)

OHIO ST. 106-22 (.828)
TEXAS 106-23 (.821)
USC 105-24 (.813)
OKLAHOMA 109-26 (.807)
TCU 98-27 (.784)
LSU 102-29 (.778)
FLORIDA 98-32 (.753)
VIRGINIA TECH 99-34 (.744)
UTAH 92-32 (.741)
GEORGIA 96-34 (.738)
AUBURN 93-35 (.726)
OREGON 89-37 (.706)
MIAMI (FL) 88-38 (.698)
WEST VIRGINIA 88-38 (.698)
BOSTON COLLEGE 88-41 (.682)
WISCONSIN 88-41 (.682)
IOWA 85-41 (.674)
TEXAS TECH 86-42 (.671)
ALABAMA 86-43 (.667)
HAWAII 87-46 (.654)
BYU 82-44 (.650)
LOUISVILLE 81-44 (.648)
FLORIDA ST. 84-46 (.646)
NEBRASKA 84-46 (.646)
PENN ST. 79-45 (.637)
TENNESSEE 81-47 (.632)
MICHIGAN 79-46 (.632)
SOUTH FLORIDA 76-45 (.628)
FRESNO ST. 82-49 (.625)
MISSOURI 77-49 (.611)
PITTSBURGH 75-49 (.604)
GEORGIA TECH 78-52 (.600)
MARYLAND 75-50 (.600)
OKLAHOMA ST. 75-50 (.600)
CLEMSON 76-51 (.598)
ARKANSAS 75-51 (.595)
CINCINNATI 75-51 (.595)
OREGON ST. 74-51 (.592)
NORTHERN ILLINOIS 73-51 (.588)
CALIFORNIA 73-52 (.584)
SOUTHERN MISS 74-53 (.582)
NAVY 72-53 (.576)
BOWLING GREEN 70-52 (.573)
TOLEDO 71-53 (.572)
TROY 69-53 (.565)
NEVADA 70-55 (.560)
NOTRE DAME 69-54 (.560)
SOUTH CAROLINA 69-55 (.556)
AIR FORCE 68-55 (.552)
CONNECTICUT 67-55 (.549)
KANSAS ST. 67-57 (.540)
MICHIGAN ST. 66-58 (.532)
NORTH CAROLINA ST. 66-58 (.532)
ARIZONA ST. 65-58 (.528)
TEXAS A&M 65-58 (.528)
TULSA 67-60 (.527)
UCLA 65-59 (.524)
MARSHALL 64-58 (.524)
PURDUE 63-61 (.508)
VIRGINIA 63-61 (.508)
WAKE FOREST 62-60 (.508)
MIAMI (OHIO) 63-62 (.504)
HOUSTON 62-63 (.496)
OLE MISS 60-61 (.495)
CENTRAL FLORIDA 61-63 (.491)
CENTRAL MICHIGAN 61-63 (.491)
NORTHWESTERN 60-63 (.487)
RUTGERS 59-63 (.483)
MIDDLE TENN. ST. 58-62 (.483)
COLORADO 60-66 (.476)
MINNESOTA 59-65 (.475)
FLORIDA ATLANTIC 40-45 (.470)
KANSAS 56-65 (.462)
WESTERN MICHIGAN 55-64 (.462)
STANFORD 54-64 (.457)
EAST CAROLINA 57-68 (.456)
WASHINGTON ST. 55-66 (.454)
NEW MEXICO 55-68 (.447)
NORTH CAROLINA 55-68 (.447)
LOUISIANA TECH 54-67 (.446)
KENTUCKY 54-68 (.442)
COLORADO ST. 54-69 (.439)
ARIZONA 51-69 (.425)
BALL ST. 51-69 (.425)
OHIO 51-71 (.418)
IOWA ST. 51-72 (.414)
MEMPHIS 50-72 (.409)
SYRACUSE 48-73 (.396)
ARKANSAS ST. 47-72 (.394)
RICE 47-72 (.394)
ILLINOIS 47-73 (.391)
UAB 46-72 (.389)
AKRON 46-73 (.386)
UTEP 46-75 (.380)
LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE 44-73 (.376)
WASHINGTON 45-76 (.371)
WYOMING 44-75 (.369)
SAN DIEGO ST. 44-76 (.367)
KENT. ST. 43-74 (.367)
MISSISSIPPI ST. 43-76 (.361)
LOUISIANA MONROE 41-76 (.350)
NORTH TEXAS 42-79 (.347)
INDIANA 41-77 (.347)
TULANE 40-79 (.336)
SAN JOSE ST. 40-80 (.333)
BAYLOR 39-79 (.330)
TEMPLE 38-80 (.322)
SMU 38-82 (.316)
NEW MEXICO ST. 36-85 (.297)
UNLV 35-83 (.296)
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL 24-58 (.292)
VANDERBILT 33-85 (.279)
IDAHO 32-88 (.267)
ARMY 31-88 (.260)
UTAH ST. 30-86 (.258)
BUFFALO 30-89 (.252)
WESTERN KENTUCKY 11-37 (.229)
EASTERN MICHIGAN 26-91 (.222)
DUKE 22-95 (.188)

[dan_457]

Interesting List here, at first I was thinking this should be in the CFB forum, but it can actually be a Useful reference for people choosing a program to build up. I Knew duke was bad, but had no Idea they've been the worst team in the entire FBS, that might be a fun program to build on.

[TDenverFan]

Poor Duke... I never realized Mississippi State would be so low and BC so high.

Nice list!

[SlickRick11]

Quote: Originally Posted by TDenverFan

Poor Duke... I never realized Mississippi State would be so low and BC so high. Nice list!

yeah Mississippi St. gets has a solid defense but overall gets beat up on by the SEC and BC has some good seasons when they were in the Big East before 2005 so that helped them out

[The GIGGAS]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlickRick11

yeah Mississippi St. gets has a solid defense but overall gets beat up on by the SEC and BC has some good seasons when they were in the Big East before 2005 so that helped them out

Also, they made the ACC Championship Game two straight years in 2007 and 2008.

[SlickRick11]

Quote: Originally Posted by The GIGGAS

Also, they made the ACC Championship Game two straight years in 2007 and 2008.

Very True the Matt Ryan era.....

[FightinSnydersKSU]

You should make three different groups for all those teams. One would be with losing records, the second would be around/ within .500 record, maybe by like ten to fifteen games or whatever people decide on, and then those with dominating records for those people that want to start a dynasty with the horrid teams, then move to the middle teams for a better job, but then land that big job that's been good for awhile. Just an idea.

[dan_457]

Quote: Originally Posted by FightinSnydersKSU

You should make three different groups for all those teams. One would be with losing records, the second would be around/ within .500 record, maybe by like ten to fifteen games or whatever people decide on, and then those with dominating records for those people that want to start a dynasty with the horrid teams, then move to the middle teams for a better job, but then land that big job that's been good for awhile. Just an idea.

This is a solid Idea, it would give a good criteria for whats a realistic jump from one Job to another.