Exovaldes All-Madden sliders

[Exovaldes]

So my goal was to try to push the sliders to a bit more realistic direction. As you all know, for us longer term ballers it's rather easy to burn the AI, no matter what difficulty we play in. So, without further ado, here comes Johnny.

PLAYCALLING: Conventional
Quarter Length: 10-15 min, what ever feels comfortable
Clock Runoff: 20 or 25sec
Auto-Strafe: On
Auto-Sprint: Off
Game Speed: Own decision. I play with Very Fast.
Speed Threshold: 0
Injuries: 20
Fatigue: 60

Number on the left indicates HUM, on the right the CPU.
Stuff written in RED is the result of ultimate brainstorm, that helped me solve the question of INTs, running and defensive pressure.

PASSING
QB Accuracy: 15/70 Make it 65, if the CPU QB just doesn't turn the ball over, and it makes you go nuts.
Pass Blocking: 0/0
WR Cathing: 45/70

The Human accuracy must be low, or either you'll throw like 2 incompletions. Blocking seems to be ridiculous, but still provides decent protection. If Catching is under 45, you'll get ridiculous amounts of dropped passes.

RUSHING
Broken Tackles: 30/30
Run Blocking: 0/30 Improved: 4/40
Fumbles: 20/60

We've all seen AP run. Putting broken tackles this low cuts down some of those ridiculous 7 to 10 wannabe tackles.
Though the CPU run blocking is way higher than HUM, you'll still get decent penetration but not so many TFL's.
* Now I'm able to get like 50-70 yard games without breaking one open. Average is around 3.5-4.0 yds per carry.

PASS D#
Reaction Time: 20-25/100 0-10/100
Interceptions: 40-50/20-40 40-60/30
Pass Rushing: 0-5/30-40 2-5/30

Set those by yourself, see whats working. I have to keep CPU INT low, for it was forcing impossible turnovers. (I bolded the ones that I use). The CPU reaction has to be at 100, either it'll be way too easy to torch their secondary.
* Yeah, I radically increased the HUM INTs, and certainly not without a proper reason. In the 2010 season everything was fine, but then came '11 and SB champs hangover. My leading interceptor was, no kidding, D. Fletcher with 2 picks. May have been a bad year, but oh come ON. 2 picks?
* I also ran some tests on pass rushing (on HUM side) that deflated after my 1st season. For example, in season 1 I had two guys over double digit sacks (J. Cunningham - LOLB, R. Seymour - DE/DT), while in 2011 only one crossed the 6 sacks mark (J. Cunningham). Even though I had the D-line comparable to the Steel Curtain: T. Warren, V. Wilfork, R. Seymour. (Well, maybe not.)

RUSH D#
Reaction Time: 0/100
Block Shedding: 0/5 0/0.
Tackling: 50/50
The CPU was coming through way too fast. Wasn't funny anymore, when 6 guys were next to my halfback before he had even gotten the ball.

Substitutions

Offense
QB Out 5 QB In 10
RB Out 30 RB In 40
WR Out 50 WR In 60
FB Out 35 FB In 45
TE Out 35 TE In 45
OL Out 5 OL In 15

Defense
DT Out 30 DT In 40
DE Out 30 DE In 40
LB Out 25 LB In 35
CB Out 20 CB In 30
S Out 40 S In 60


Subs still need some tweaking, and I'm working on it.

I'll be adding some game results done with these sliders below. In the mean time, feel free to try these out and please, comment.

Cheers.

[Jarodd21]

Welcome to the world of sliders man... Looks good..

[Exovaldes]

I'll upload my Franchise results, for I was too lazy to start new games.

Week 1
NE 39 - CIN 29

NE - CIN
Total Offense: 383 - 357
Rushing Yds: 48 - 46
Passing Yds: 335 - 312
First Downs: 18 - 15
Sacks: 4 - 3
Kickoff returned for 6 (NE)

Personal Stats:

Passing:
T. Brady 28/40, 70%, 2TD, 0 INT, 33 Long
C. Palmer 22/42, 52%, 4TD, 2 INT, 31 Long

Rushing:
B. Green-Ellis 17 Att., 47 yd, 2.7 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB
C. Benson 14 Att., 45 yd, 3.2 AVG, 0 TD, 1 FUMB
S. Morris 1 Att., 1 yd, 1 AVG, 1 TD, 0 FUMB
T. Brady 1 Att., 0 yd, 0 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB

Receiving:
J. Shipley 9 Rec, 164 yd, 4 TD
W. Welker 6 Rec, 81 yd, 0 TD
R. Gronkowski 5 Rec, 85 yd, 2 TD
B. Tate 5 Rec, 64 yd, 0 TD
A. Hernandez 4 Rec, 30 yd, 0 TD

Kicking:
S. Graham 4 FGM, 5 FGA, 80%, 45 Long
M. Nugent 0 FGM, 1 FGA, 0%

Conclusion:
Shipley torched my backfield, for I had all my good Corners covering 85 and Owens, who had combined 30 yards and 2 catches.

Both INT's were kind of accidents, for Palmer got blasted and ball just wobbled to Mayo and Guyton (both are MLB).

[Exovaldes]

Week 2:

NYJ 25 - NE 12

NE - NYJ
Total Offense: 360 - 404
Rushing Yds: 41 - 93
Passing Yds: 321 - 311
First Downs: 17 - 19
Sacks: 2 - 1

Personal stats:

Passing:
M. Brunell 21/30, 70%, 3 TD, 0 INT, 71 Long
T. Brady 30/48, 62%, 1 TD, 1 INT, 28 Long

Rushing:
L. Tomlinson 21 Att., 84 Yd, 4.0 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB
B. Green-Ellis 9 Att., 41 Yd, 4.5 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB
B. Smith 1 Att., 9 Yd, 9.0 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB

Receiving:
W. Welker 11 Rec, 114 Yd, 0 TD
J. Cotchery 6 Rec, 102 Yd, 1 TD
B. Tate 6 Rec, 100 Yd, 1 TD
B. Edwards 4 Rec, 64 Yd, 1 TD
S. Holmes 3 Rec, 96 Yd, 1 TD

Conclusion:
A low scoring game. I didn't get one point in the last two quarters due to the immense Jets pressure. I traded Matt Light and two picks for Richard Seymour, so that may be the reason why my left side of the line was on it's butt most of the time. Seymour got both of my sacks.

[Exovaldes]

Week 7

NE 20 - SD 13

NE - SD
Total Offense: 323 - 275
Rushing Yds: 26 - 28
Passing Yds: 292 - 247
First Downs: 18 - 8
Sacks: 0 - 3

Personal Stats:

Passing:
T. Brady 32/41, 78%, 2 TD, 1 INT, 23 Long
P. Rivers 15/30, 50%, 1 TD, 1 INT, 52 Long

Rushing:
R. Matthews 16 Att., 20 Yd, 1.2 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB
B. Green-Ellis 11 Att., 27 Yd, 2.4 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB
D. Sproles 1 Att., 8 Yd, 8 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB
D. Woodhead 1 Att., -2 Yd, -2 AVG, 0 TD, 0 FUMB

Receiving:
W. Welker 8 Rec, 49 Yds, 1 TD
A. Gates 5 Rec, 45 Yds, 0 TD
R. Gronkowski 4 Rec, 48 Yds, 0 TD
A. Hernandez 4 Rec, 54 Yds, 0 TD
V. Jackson 1 Rec, 52 Yds, 1 TD

Conclusion:
Watching glue dry would've been more interesting. Jackson got his fifty-yarder when McCourty and Meriweather ran to each other and fell.

[asusundevil22]

man these are awesome i like em and they fit my style appreciate it bro.

[pjmoore 28]

What would I have to change in order to see better rushing yards?? I saw in ur jets game they had 95. I kinda wanna see the CPU get at least 60 a game. If they don't do that they aren't being balanced?

[mjhyankees]

Quote: Originally Posted by pjmoore 28

What would I have to change in order to see better rushing yards?? I saw in ur jets game they had 95. I kinda wanna see the CPU get at least 60 a game. If they don't do that they aren't being balanced?

I would lower human run reaction I've got mine on 17 and tackling on 45. I regularly get games where the cpu rushes of 80,90, or 100 yards.