Who agrees with me on these two features.

[HoundsOfHowl]

As always the NCAA dev. team is focusing on gameplay and presentation. Ok these two features would make an even more awesome game. If they added create-a-rival feature and new create a schedule feature.

Create-a-rival : Either have you go in and manualy do this in Dynasty options or after a couple years of playing a team and having close games it makes them your rival. Maybe even be able to create a trophy to have for your rivalry and a name.

New scheduling feature : Have it like the college hoops games, where if you are a small or mid major program having some rough years these big schools won't come to your stadium, and vice-versa, if you are a big school some of these smaller schools may not play you because they dont want to get slaughtered.

*also a feature that I'm sure we could all agree on, is having a real crowd, if your team is only averaging 10,000 fans per game and your stadium seats 25k then the stadium should look half full. Also if the games are blowouts the crowd should start leaving and making the stadium look like its emptying out.

[dan_457]

I would love if there was a sort of new rival logic implemented. Where if you played enough great games against a school(judged by using a score like the ESPN instant classics games) enough you'd get the option to add them as a rival. Even if you could just manually add one it'd be great.

[JohnZapp]

there should be create a rival for your teambuilder so they can ACTUALLY HAVE A RIVAL

[PaperBoyx703]

Quote: Originally Posted by JohnZapp

there should be create a rival for your teambuilder so they can ACTUALLY HAVE A RIVAL

Yeah I have always thought about this for years. I like it alot and since the games record greatest games then it should be able to take that and generate rivals. Also blowing out(running up the score) teams should contribute to hatred too.

[Special27K]

These two would increase the re-playability of dynasty by years and years. For the rivals, they'd have to ask if you'd like to make it a rivalry game is my only suggestion. I don't want every conference opponent to become a rival. For the scheduling idea, I love it. It should've been implemented the year after the Basketball game did it. Miami(FL) should never be like "Yeah, we'll come to Toledo and play there" (This is kind of a joke since in 2013 that game is happening). But, none the less games like that should be rare for MAC/C-USA/Sun Belt teams to host.

[TDenverFan]

Maybe if you play an OOC team 3 years in a row, a screen pops up that says 'Your team, ______, just formed a rivalry with _______. WOuld you like to name this rivalry?' and then you could give your rivalry a name (Battle of Idaho, Battle For THe Freemont Cannon, Holy War, etc.). Also, if 3 years in a row, you have an instant classic with a conference rival, you could create a rivalry.

Maybe a rivalry ould be removed if you don't play that team for at least 4 years.

[DCDuck]

Quote: Originally Posted by TDenverFan

Maybe a rivalry ould be removed if you don't play that team for at least 4 years.

Unless you're Notre Dame, who played Miami last year after a decade-plus-long hiatus and people still touted it as a "rivalry".

Then again, Notre Dame somehow manages to get by every pre-established rule in the franchise when it comes to Dynasty mode (6-star prestige every single year?)

[UniversityofArizona]

New rivalries would be great! Or maybe just have a rivalry meter with all schools. If it is full from several years of bitterly close games for conference championships the meter should be full and the crowds should react appropriately. If it is empty, then it is treated as a normal game and the fans don't care as much. For instance because two teams have never played each other, or because one team always slaughters the other.