Jordan's Rating in NBA 2k11

[bbolo84]

Not sure if this topic has already been debated, but what do you guys think Jordan's rating should be in the game?

I believe if anyone is deserving of a 99 then it should be him.

But I also understand the argument that no one is perfect, therefore no one should enjoy that high a rating. What do you guys think?

Edit: Forgot to take into account we have several versions of MJ in the game. So when Jordan was in his prime (which is debatable as well), what do you think his rating would be?

[youvalss]

Depends which Jordan. I think we have 8 Jordans.

[eko718]

The question should probably be what will Jordan's ratings* be, whereas there are 8 different versions. Hard to tell without knowing how they approached ratings this year, but you know he's the highest rated player in the game, so anywhere from 96-99 for most Jordan's if the ratings scale stays the same as in 2K10. I wonder what they will rated the Sophmore Jordan who dropped 63 on the Celts. His game wasn't as all around back then.

[youvalss]

Quote: Originally Posted by eko718

The question should probably be what will Jordan's ratings* be, whereas there are 8 different versions. Hard to tell without knowing how they approached ratings this year, but you know he's the highest rated player in the game, so anywhere from 96-99 for most Jordan's if the ratings scale stays the same as in 2K10. I wonder what they will rated the Sophmore Jordan who dropped 63 on the Celts. His game wasn't as all around back then.

I remember devs saying something about shoes giving you some boost, or something like that. Now, if we can give 1986 MJ the AJ 6's...hmmmm...

[JWiLL02]

I think young Jordan would be a low to mid 90s, incredible athleticism but his skills aren't all developed yet.

Late 80s-93 Jordan is a 99, though it's more like a 105. His game had developed and his body had too, his athleticism in terms of explosiveness, body control, etc. was second to none. The ultimate player at this point.

Around 96-98 for 2nd threepeat Jordan. Obviously his athleticism had declined some, but his post game was dominant and he still had the innate ability to take over for quarters at a time. I'd give his mid range J a 99 at this point.

[jeebs9]

Yea I ask this a while back....Thread didn't get much heat.

Player	HGT	POS	OVR	CLOSE	MED	3PT	FT	LAYUP	DUNK	HNDL	PASS	OPOST	DPOST	BLOCK	STEAL	OREB	DREB	SPEED	STAM	DUR	DAWAR	OAWAR	STR	VERT	SOD	SIT	QUI	HUS	HND	DEF	STDNK
Michael Jordan	6'6"	SG	99	85	95	75	83	99	99	85	78	90	88	67	88	55	69	85	94	99	96	99	79	99	90	90	88	99	95	95	60

I just did that off the top of my head. So don't kill me for any weird ratings lol

[jeebs9]

Also don't mind the links...I used it as a template.

[bbolo84]

Quote: Originally Posted by JWiLL02

I think young Jordan would be a low to mid 90s, incredible athleticism but his skills aren't all developed yet. Late 80s-93 Jordan is a 99, though it's more like a 105. His game had developed and his body had too, his athleticism in terms of explosiveness, body control, etc. was second to none. The ultimate player at this point. Around 96-98 for 2nd threepeat Jordan. Obviously his athleticism had declined some, but his post game was dominant and he still had the innate ability to take over for quarters at a time. I'd give his mid range J a 99 at this point.

I think this is dead on. The 80s-93s Jordan was just sick.