More Links

msuhockeycj · 08-28-2010, 04:47 PM

So I believe if a player is skating in on an empty net and tripped, or other situation that would normally be a penalty shot then a goal is just awarded. Well I had this happen in a game and was given a penalty shot with the opposing goalie in net. The goalie was pulled before but allowed to go back in net for the penalty shot. Am I wrong on the rule or did EA just not put this in the game?

msuhockeycj · 08-28-2010, 04:48 PM

Just to clarify this was in the NHL 11 demo

fullmetal2405 · 08-28-2010, 05:52 PM

Quote:


	If at the time a penalty shot is awarded, the goalkeeper of the penalized team has been removed from the ice to substitute another player, the goalkeeper shall be permitted to return to the ice before the penalty shot is taken. The team against whom the penalty shot has been assessed may replace their goalkeeper to defend against the penalty shot, however, the substitute goalkeeper is required to remain in the game until the next stoppage of play.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26308

bonannogiovanni · 08-28-2010, 06:00 PM

The point is, regardless of where the goalie is, a goal should be awarded if the tripped player would have clearly scored, not a penalty shot. So basically EA rule is wrong, however these are rare occurrences.

CS10029 · 08-28-2010, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bonannogiovanni


	The point is, regardless of where the goalie is, a goal should be awarded if the tripped player would have clearly scored, not a penalty shot. So basically EA rule is wrong, however these are rare occurrences.

LOL, you are basically saying the NHL's rules are wrong, in it's own game.

I am talking about real hockey.

theaub · 08-28-2010, 06:34 PM

Well it is wrong in the game since that is an auto-goal...

CS10029 · 08-28-2010, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theaub


	Well it is wrong in the game since that is an auto-goal...

No, he said it was called a penalty shot. Then the goalie was back in net for the penalty shot also. Which is what someone posted as the NHL rules.

Unless I am reading something wrong, or missing something.

ClarkKent · 08-28-2010, 06:44 PM

Redshirt has commented on the issue,

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2041526708
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2041498649

Known issue, presentation problems occur when it occurs.

08-28-2010, 04:47 PM	#1
msuhockeycj Rookie OVR: 8 Join Date: Apr 2004	Rule problem So I believe if a player is skating in on an empty net and tripped, or other situation that would normally be a penalty shot then a goal is just awarded. Well I had this happen in a game and was given a penalty shot with the opposing goalie in net. The goalie was pulled before but allowed to go back in net for the penalty shot. Am I wrong on the rule or did EA just not put this in the game?

08-28-2010, 04:48 PM	#2
msuhockeycj Rookie OVR: 8 Join Date: Apr 2004	Re: Rule problem Just to clarify this was in the NHL 11 demo

08-28-2010, 06:00 PM	#4
bonannogiovanni MVP OVR: 15 Join Date: Oct 2004	Re: Rule problem The point is, regardless of where the goalie is, a goal should be awarded if the tripped player would have clearly scored, not a penalty shot. So basically EA rule is wrong, however these are rare occurrences.

08-28-2010, 06:34 PM	#6
theaub Stop! Homer Time! OVR: 35 Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Thornhill, Ontario Posts: 9,643 Blog Entries: 4	Re: Rule problem Well it is wrong in the game since that is an auto-goal... __________________ Blue Jays, Blackhawks, Auburn

08-28-2010, 06:44 PM	#8
ClarkKent Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: B.C., Canada	Re: Rule problem Redshirt has commented on the issue, http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2041526708 http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2041498649 Known issue, presentation problems occur when it occurs.

	College Football 25 All-In-One Recruiting Guide: Do This, Not That
	Madden 25 Review: Stalling in the Red Zone
	Good AI in Football Games Is Way Too Rare

More Links

Rule problem