My QB sim stats are completely broken, how do I fix this?

[chemicalxv]

I thought they said they fixed the sim stats. This is just ridiculous. In my 2nd year of franchise:

QB RATING:
1. D. Brees - 103.2
2. M. Schaub - 91.5
3. M. Ryan - 89.8
4. T. Romo - 88.4
5. P. Manning - 87.0
6. K. Orton - 87.0
7. J. Flacco - 86.4
8. M. Sanchez - 85.9
Other Notables - T. Brady (77.0), B. Roethlisberger (76.2), M. Stafford (72.7), C. Palmer (72.5), P. Rivers (68.0), V. Young (67.7)

YARDS (I think this is the worst)
1. P. Manning - 4815
2. T. Brady - 4010
3. J. Clausen - 3912
(From here it just gets ridiculous)
4. K. Orton - 3685
5. M. Sanchez - 3484
6. D. Brees - 3473
7. J. Flacco - 3467
8. R. You (lawl) - 3466
9. T. Romo - 3415
Cutler (3281), Ryan (3273), McNabb (3260), Schaub (3242), C. McCoy (3217), Stafford (3141), Rivers (3101), Roethlisberger (3094), E. Manning (2957), Palmer (2743)

TDs
1. P. Manning - 32
2. Schaub - 28
3. Clausen - 27
4. Brees - 26
5. Ryan - 26
6. Matchwood (Rookie, 82 OVR) - 26
7. Brady - 25
8. Orton - 25
9. Romo - 24
10. Sanchez - 23
11. Ben - 22
12. McNabb - 21
13. Rivers - 21
Stafford (15), E. Manning (15), Young (9)

INTs
1. A. Smith - 25
2. Cutler - 24
3. Clausen - 22
4. Brady - 21
5. Rivers - 21
6. P. Manning - 20
7. Cassel - 20
8. You - 18
And then guys like McNabb, Flacco, Ryan and Romo all throw 11 INTs, Eli throws 9, Schaub throws 7 and Brees doesn't even make the list because he only threw 4.

COMPLETION %
Completion % has been a huge problem for awhile now. The average year you're lucky if there's 5 players above 60%, whereas you look at it in real life and almost any decent QB can hit that mark. 20 TEAMS hit over that mark last year, and only one TEAM was under 50 (Browns)
1. Brees- 65.6%
2. Orton - 63.6%
3. Romo - 60.6%
4. Campbell - 60.1%
5. Ryan - 60.0%
6. Flacco - 59.3%
7. Sanchez - 58.1%
8. E. Manning - 57.8%
9. Schaub - 57.2%
10. P. Manning - 57.1%
11. Kolb - 57.1%
12. You - 57.0%
(And since I'm getting lazy at calculating I'll just post what the game lists)
Brady, Stafford, Matchwood (R) at 56%, Cassel, Palmer, Young, Big Ben, McNabb at 55%, Rivers at 54%, Cutler at 51%, and Alex Smith at the lowest appearing on the list at 48%

Oh yeah Drew Brees missed 4 games.

Tl; dr - QB Stats are by far worse than last year.

Oh and yeah and as a quick aside only 13 RBs averaged 4.0 YPC or more and 3 of those weren't even starting RBs. There's a HUGE bottleneck around 3.6 to 3.9 (23 RBs in that range)

[lostrelms]

I would like to humbly point out, that these stats are 1,000,000,000 more realistic and acceptable, then the stats Madden 10's sim engine would spit out after patch 2.

[Franchise408]

Quote: Originally Posted by lostrelms

I would like to humbly point out, that these stats are 1,000,000,000 more realistic and acceptable, then the stats Madden 10's sim engine would spit out after patch 2.

Yea while they are slightly off, but I don't see anything too bad about those stats.

[Exonerated]

looks fine to me.

[JaymeeAwesome]

Those are the kind of stats I would want for my franchise. I honestly don't see your complaint

[SmashMan]

I'll copy everyone else's reply and say I don't see anything that's too bad here. There are some that are a little off, but you never know if a guy will have a great year...or a bad one, for that matter.

You can compare these stats to last year's NFL stats and see that overall, it's pretty good.

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...S&d-447263-n=1

[ComfortablyLomb]

Those stats look plausible. Honestly, given the way the devs broke the stats in franchise mode with patch #2 last year I have my fingers crossed that they don't touch them.

[JWurm7]

Agree with everyone else here. Those look pretty damn good. No, not perfect, but damn close.