|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
|
Rookie starting higher than potential?!?!
|
|
|
| Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MVP
|
Re: Rookie starting higher than potential?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
|
Re: Rookie starting higher than potential?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
All Star
|
Re: Rookie starting higher than potential?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
|
Re: Rookie starting higher than potential?!?!
|
|
|
| Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MVP
|
Re: Rookie starting higher than potential?!?!
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.
|
Top -
|








. I didn't sign any of the guys because I actually drafted pretty well, but if I hadn't drafted any guys over a 75 or so potential, I would've signed probably two(which is the amount of 88-99 potential guys the cpu usually drafts).