More Links

RogueHominid · 01-03-2009, 11:29 PM

Watching the Colts-Chargers game this evening brought an interesting issue up for me regarding sim gameplay. Peyton Manning caught the Chargers in a substitution package, went no huddle (in the middle of the 3rd quarter), caught the Chargers unprepared, and threw a 62 yard touchdown to Reggie Wayne.

For me, this sort of play calls into question the theory that running no huddle except for late game situations is cheeze and that hiking the ball before your opponent has fully settled in and done all his adjustments and such is cheeze. I personally allow my opponents to set their adjustments within reason, and I allow them to finish their audibles (for example, if they're in zone and audible to man, I'll let everyone get set). However, seeing this kind of play irl makes me wonder if it should be considered cheeze to do otherwise.

There are certain plays I call just hoping I'll catch my opponent in a zone. If I do, I know what my options will be. Should I have to wait for them to adjust when teams in real life don't?

Thoughts?

(PS: Saw a TE reverse in the Colts game, too, lol).

sleepychicken · 01-03-2009, 11:50 PM

Arizona did it earlier as well. I never understood the complaint from day one. Both sides tire when it's done. If you matched up on personnel on the original play, then you're still matched up. If you came into the game without audibles, that's your own fault. It's more of an advantage in real life than on the game since we as gamers don't do nearly the substituting they do in real life (nearly every play).

I haven't played this game in months, and have just gotten a new gaming system, so maybe someone found some magical way for no huddle to be a major advantage for the offense. It wasn't when the game released.

I rarely ever did it. I had it done to me, and usually was happy to see it. I usually felt I had the advantage with my audibles set up. If I was dumb enough to come out in a 4-3 when they had called a 4wr set on the original play, I can't blame them for doing it for the personnel mis-match. That's what timeouts are for.

Not trying to start a debate, but I never did see no huddle as cheese. As it only and offensive advantage if you aren't prepared on defense.

I can't remember now what the arguments were against it back then, but I'm sure they'll surface soon.

Again, I didn't even use it. I never had an offense built for it. All I would do is tire out my crappy receivers if I tried. So, I don't really care that "sim" leagues outlaw it as anything but a 2 minute drill thing, but I do think it's silly.

RogueHominid · 01-03-2009, 11:53 PM

And what about those plays where you catch the defense out of position? That's exactly what Manning did, and he wasn't "sim" about it at all, lol. He saw his mismatch and took it.

LingeringRegime · 01-04-2009, 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trojan Man


	And what about those plays where you catch the defense out of position? That's exactly what Manning did, and he wasn't "sim" about it at all, lol. He saw his mismatch and took it.

Yeah, I think there is a very fine line of being part of the "Sim Swat Team." Many times it can turn into a cop out for not being able to win a game. Cheese for me is very limited...

1. Quarterback "Vicking"
2. Fake Punts
3. Going for it on 4th Down when it is especially stupid to do so. (Deep in your own territory, or 4th and 10+)
4. "Stupid" Two Point Conversions.

*By the way, wow great game between Chargers and Colts right now. 2:00 warning and Colts punting out of their own end zone. Should be a classic finish.

Pappy Knuckles · 01-04-2009, 12:04 AM

In real life, I'm in the "offense doesn't wait for defense" school of thought. You do whatever you can to create an opportunity and then you take advantage of it. The videogame environment is totally different beast to me though. Instead of instincts, knowing the situation, and making quick decisions, your defenders are often at the mercy of you pressing buttons quickly enough to set matchups that they would otherwise miss. In real life you don't have to worry about falling on your face when you decide guard a certain receiver.

I don't think mixing in no-huddle plays or snapping before their players are set is cheese. I've competed against guys who did this in a way that was smart, and I didn't complain a bit. However, if that's the bulk of your offense I definitely feel it has Velveta written all over it. I don't really enjoy playing games like that.

RogueHominid · 01-04-2009, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pappy Knuckles


	In real life, I'm in the "offense doesn't wait for defense" school of thought. You do whatever you can to create an opportunity and then you take advantage of it. The videogame environment is totally different beast to me though. Instead of instincts, knowing the situation, and making quick decisions, your defenders are often at the mercy of you pressing buttons quickly enough to set matchups that they would otherwise miss. In real life you don't have to worry about falling on your face when you decide guard a certain receiver. I don't think mixing in no-huddle plays or snapping before their players are set is cheese. I've competed against guys who did this in a way that was smart, and I didn't complain a bit. However, if that's the bulk of your offense I definitely feel it has Velveta written all over it. I don't really enjoy playing games like that.

Well, you know it's not how I play, but I'm curious to hear what others think. Some dude in our league will snap on you mid-audible; I take it in stride but don't do it myself.

BTW, I'm waitin' for you as soon as this crazy Colts game is over, which may be soon. The twist of a facemask may be it.

LBzrule · 01-04-2009, 01:04 AM

It's completely different IMO. Notice with the Colts the defenders were not even aware. It's not like if you do that in a video game the defenders will not be any more or less aware as they are on other plays. The only one that is not aware will you and the guy you are controlling. Secondly, Manning SAW something. Most times guys in video games do not SEE ANYTHING. They just hike it and chuck it and the game rewards them.

fldash · 01-04-2009, 01:09 AM

Sprinkled in throughout a game is definitely not 'cheese' if you ask me. It's part of football.

01-03-2009, 11:29 PM	#1
RogueHominid Hall Of Fame OVR: 33 Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 10,882	Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts Watching the Colts-Chargers game this evening brought an interesting issue up for me regarding sim gameplay. Peyton Manning caught the Chargers in a substitution package, went no huddle (in the middle of the 3rd quarter), caught the Chargers unprepared, and threw a 62 yard touchdown to Reggie Wayne. For me, this sort of play calls into question the theory that running no huddle except for late game situations is cheeze and that hiking the ball before your opponent has fully settled in and done all his adjustments and such is cheeze. I personally allow my opponents to set their adjustments within reason, and I allow them to finish their audibles (for example, if they're in zone and audible to man, I'll let everyone get set). However, seeing this kind of play irl makes me wonder if it should be considered cheeze to do otherwise. There are certain plays I call just hoping I'll catch my opponent in a zone. If I do, I know what my options will be. Should I have to wait for them to adjust when teams in real life don't? Thoughts? (PS: Saw a TE reverse in the Colts game, too, lol).

01-03-2009, 11:50 PM	#2
sleepychicken Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Panama City Beach, FL	Re: Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts Arizona did it earlier as well. I never understood the complaint from day one. Both sides tire when it's done. If you matched up on personnel on the original play, then you're still matched up. If you came into the game without audibles, that's your own fault. It's more of an advantage in real life than on the game since we as gamers don't do nearly the substituting they do in real life (nearly every play). I haven't played this game in months, and have just gotten a new gaming system, so maybe someone found some magical way for no huddle to be a major advantage for the offense. It wasn't when the game released. I rarely ever did it. I had it done to me, and usually was happy to see it. I usually felt I had the advantage with my audibles set up. If I was dumb enough to come out in a 4-3 when they had called a 4wr set on the original play, I can't blame them for doing it for the personnel mis-match. That's what timeouts are for. Not trying to start a debate, but I never did see no huddle as cheese. As it only and offensive advantage if you aren't prepared on defense. I can't remember now what the arguments were against it back then, but I'm sure they'll surface soon. Again, I didn't even use it. I never had an offense built for it. All I would do is tire out my crappy receivers if I tried. So, I don't really care that "sim" leagues outlaw it as anything but a 2 minute drill thing, but I do think it's silly.

01-03-2009, 11:53 PM	#3
RogueHominid Hall Of Fame OVR: 33 Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 10,882	Re: Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts And what about those plays where you catch the defense out of position? That's exactly what Manning did, and he wasn't "sim" about it at all, lol. He saw his mismatch and took it.

01-04-2009, 12:04 AM	#5
Pappy Knuckles LORDTHUNDERBIRD OVR: 46 Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Durham, NC Posts: 15,973 Blog Entries: 33	Re: Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts In real life, I'm in the "offense doesn't wait for defense" school of thought. You do whatever you can to create an opportunity and then you take advantage of it. The videogame environment is totally different beast to me though. Instead of instincts, knowing the situation, and making quick decisions, your defenders are often at the mercy of you pressing buttons quickly enough to set matchups that they would otherwise miss. In real life you don't have to worry about falling on your face when you decide guard a certain receiver. I don't think mixing in no-huddle plays or snapping before their players are set is cheese. I've competed against guys who did this in a way that was smart, and I didn't complain a bit. However, if that's the bulk of your offense I definitely feel it has Velveta written all over it. I don't really enjoy playing games like that.

01-04-2009, 01:04 AM	#7
LBzrule Hall Of Fame OVR: 40 Join Date: Jul 2002 Blog Entries: 8	Re: Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts It's completely different IMO. Notice with the Colts the defenders were not even aware. It's not like if you do that in a video game the defenders will not be any more or less aware as they are on other plays. The only one that is not aware will you and the guy you are controlling. Secondly, Manning SAW something. Most times guys in video games do not SEE ANYTHING. They just hike it and chuck it and the game rewards them.

	A New Patch Creates That Urge to Start Fresh
	NBA 2K25 MyNBA: How to Avoid Too Many Free Agents Staying Unsigned
	College Football 25 Guide: What Goes Into a 'Best Playbook' and How to Find Your Own

01-04-2009, 01:09 AM	#8
fldash Banned OVR: 7 Join Date: Dec 2008	Re: Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts Sprinkled in throughout a game is definitely not 'cheese' if you ask me. It's part of football.

More Links

Quick Snapping, No Huddle, and the Colts