Home

No love for Aaron Rodgers

This is a discussion on No love for Aaron Rodgers within the Madden NFL Old Gen Rosters forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Old Gen > Madden NFL Old Gen Rosters
New OS Forums Are Coming on May 1
The Best Sports Gaming Year of All-Time
Arcade Sports Games Need a Revival
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2008, 03:35 AM   #1
MVP
 
Kohlstar20's Arena
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: Feb 2005
No love for Aaron Rodgers

What's the deal EA? Rodgers deserves a big ratings bump. His ratings have barely been touched all season long. Just because the Packers defense has been terrible this season doesn't mean Rodgers should be penalized. He has been nothing short of phenomenal.

His stats thus far:
3,470 pass yards (7th in the NFL)
23 TD passes to only 12 INTs
91.8 QB rating (8th in the NFL)

But yet he is still rated an 86 ovr in Madden and has been since the first couple roster updates. Hell he was rated an 83 ovr when the game came out back in august. There is no excuse for this.
Kohlstar20 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 12-16-2008, 09:24 AM   #2
Banned
 
OVR: 14
Join Date: Sep 2008
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

Rodgers would be good at 87-88 overall. I mean, he is doing better than Jake Delhomme in that Super Bowl season. Look at Jake Delhomme's statistics as a Panther in 2003 and in the Madden they gave him an 88 overall. I would give Aaron maybe an 87... if not, 86 is fine.
NuJoiseySoulja is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 10:53 AM   #3
Banned
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

Quote:
Originally Posted by NuJoiseySoulja
Rodgers would be good at 87-88 overall. I mean, he is doing better than Jake Delhomme in that Super Bowl season. Look at Jake Delhomme's statistics as a Panther in 2003 and in the Madden they gave him an 88 overall. I would give Aaron maybe an 87... if not, 86 is fine.
ya i agree he has really good recievers and a good run game so 86 is decent but it could be 88 wouldn't go higher than that
darrenp1518 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2008, 02:25 PM   #4
MVP
 
Kohlstar20's Arena
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: Feb 2005
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

An 88 ovr would be fine. I mean he has better numbers than some of the QBs rated in the low 90s like Garrard, Favre, Eli Manning, etc.
Kohlstar20 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 11:25 PM   #5
MVP
 
TheGame8544's Arena
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: Jul 2003
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohlstar20
An 88 ovr would be fine. I mean he has better numbers than some of the QBs rated in the low 90s like Garrard, Favre, Eli Manning, etc.
Garrard is overrated.
TheGame8544 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 12-20-2008, 04:46 PM   #6
Rookie
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: May 2008
Blog Entries: 1
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

Any quarterback would look bad without wide receivers, an o-line and consequently no running game.
__________________
Playing sim is a disadvantage? I beg to differ:
150-36 Madden 09 Record.
20-4 Madden 10 Record.
24-8 Madden 12 Record.
Synkopated is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2008, 05:00 PM   #7
Rookie
 
jtstur2's Arena
 
OVR: 5
Join Date: Oct 2007
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

you think the packers have a running game, hah!
jtstur2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2008, 06:14 PM   #8
MVP
 
TheGame8544's Arena
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: Jul 2003
Re: No love for Aaron Rodgers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synkopated
Any quarterback would look bad without wide receivers, an o-line and consequently no running game.
No running game?!? But you are very right about the o-line and wide receivers.
TheGame8544 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Old Gen > Madden NFL Old Gen Rosters »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.
Top -