No love for Aaron Rodgers

[Kohlstar20]

What's the deal EA? Rodgers deserves a big ratings bump. His ratings have barely been touched all season long. Just because the Packers defense has been terrible this season doesn't mean Rodgers should be penalized. He has been nothing short of phenomenal.

His stats thus far:
3,470 pass yards (7th in the NFL)
23 TD passes to only 12 INTs
91.8 QB rating (8th in the NFL)

But yet he is still rated an 86 ovr in Madden and has been since the first couple roster updates. Hell he was rated an 83 ovr when the game came out back in august. There is no excuse for this.

[NuJoiseySoulja]

Rodgers would be good at 87-88 overall. I mean, he is doing better than Jake Delhomme in that Super Bowl season. Look at Jake Delhomme's statistics as a Panther in 2003 and in the Madden they gave him an 88 overall. I would give Aaron maybe an 87... if not, 86 is fine.

[darrenp1518]

Quote: Originally Posted by NuJoiseySoulja

Rodgers would be good at 87-88 overall. I mean, he is doing better than Jake Delhomme in that Super Bowl season. Look at Jake Delhomme's statistics as a Panther in 2003 and in the Madden they gave him an 88 overall. I would give Aaron maybe an 87... if not, 86 is fine.

ya i agree he has really good recievers and a good run game so 86 is decent but it could be 88 wouldn't go higher than that

[Kohlstar20]

An 88 ovr would be fine. I mean he has better numbers than some of the QBs rated in the low 90s like Garrard, Favre, Eli Manning, etc.

[TheGame8544]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kohlstar20

An 88 ovr would be fine. I mean he has better numbers than some of the QBs rated in the low 90s like Garrard, Favre, Eli Manning, etc.

Garrard is overrated.

[Synkopated]

Any quarterback would look bad without wide receivers, an o-line and consequently no running game.

[jtstur2]

you think the packers have a running game, hah!

[TheGame8544]

Quote: Originally Posted by Synkopated

Any quarterback would look bad without wide receivers, an o-line and consequently no running game.

No running game?!? But you are very right about the o-line and wide receivers.