GCHD Review (2.5/4)

[KojiPro]

Hey guys ,here is GCHD's review that went up a few minutes ago. The 2.5 out of 4 is roughly equivalent to about 7.8 or something..on gamestats.com anyway. Here is the link.

http://gamecinemahd.com/article/2008...ball_09_review

[PVarck31]

2.5 out of 4??? What the hell is that? I prefer the 16 point scale myself.

[Behindshadows]

To think that EA gave them a beta copy and they low rate the game. Wow! And the review was a few paragraphs about nothing.

Bad review! Poorly written! And what the hell is a 2.5 of 4?

[countryboy]

this is why the only review I trust is my own. Both reviews posted here are useless. Neither gives a review with much substance.

[EightbIts]

The review I really care about will be written by and posted here on OS.

[ehh]

Quote:

...provide very little team specific commentary, constantly spouting off the most basic of details, even after you achieve milestones like reaching the Final Four or the championship title game. In fact, you don’t even get to witness your team celebrate half the time, but instead only get to hear about your players cutting down the net. Small scenarios like this will constantly challenge your will to keep playing, especially when the sense of reward is minuscule.

Yes, the reason I play sports games is to hear cool commentary and watch cut scenes.

Weak review, especially for someone who has spent a month with the game.

[Redbird]

Evidently there wasn't much to write about.

[fishepa]

Never heard of GCHD anyway.