NBA 2K17 All-Time College Bundle Available For $14.99 - Full Details Here

[JKSportsGamer1984]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kstat

Also, looking at the rosters, MSU fans will be bummed out there's no Mateen cleaves or MoPete or even Greg Kelser. If you're buying an all college team shouldn't they have included some of the school legends, regardless of how they worked out in the NBA?

Exactly. Same goes for Miles Simon from Arizona. He was arguably the best player on their 97 championship squad yet he's not in the game smh.

[JKSportsGamer1984]

I'm still waiting on my '92 Dream Team that I was supposed to receive with my preorder smh. Haven't heard a word from 2K about this yet so needless to say after that fiasco they won't be getting another dime from me any time soon.

[JKSportsGamer1984]

Quote: Originally Posted by World1

DEAD, the fact that guys are defending this and calling players spoiled because paying $15 for created players and copies of players already in the game is ridiculous. Like guys cant be this inept to not understand this. We can literally upload these logos, make these jerseys and courts, add these duplicate players to a roster AND make terrible caps FOR FREE. This isnt about liscenses or whatever. Nobody here has an issue with 2k charging for DLC. The issue is them being lazy in doing so. Charging people $15 for half assed content is just wrong. Its not being spoiled its called common sense. Just because we want thinga done right we're spoiled? I'd rather they not do it at all if they arent going to do it right. Then to ask us to pay $15 a quarter of the game price for content we can barely use? Lol yea we're real spoiled and inconsiderate. Saying well "its an nba game, ncaa teams are a privilege" is further enabling them to not work hard on this type of stuff. If guys dont get that then idk what to tell you but the guys calling us spoiled probably werent going to buy dlc whether it was done right or not. Yalls logic is literally "You shouldnt complain about $15 worth of **** because its NCAA **** and not NBA ****.." Lmao oblivious.

Couldn't have said it better

[NINJAK2]

Quote: Originally Posted by Junior Moe

And that's your opinion. 2K sees another opportunity to cash in on the licenses for the colleges they have. Slap some pro players on the teams and sell them. It's business. And totally elective. Don't want it. Don't buy. Think it's a lazy cash grab; don't buy. But stop making it some commentary on the company or state of affairs. Though I would like to use the teams in ML it was only 15$ and I will certainly play with them throughout the year so it's all good. They could mark down VC 99% and I wouldn't touch it because I don't see the value for MY gaming experience. Everyone is different. Anything with college in it I'm buying, period. If 2K wants to play on that great.

No one can judge whether it's a lazy effort or not until they actually BUY it Junior. To my knowledge no video/screen footage existed of this DLC content prior to release. I don't think people have a problem with buying DLC when it's on the quality level as say Witcher 3. The art department should have put forth a better effort with this DLC. There are current and former members of OS who have done better work on CAPS for legend rosters for free than 2k did for pay. I think 2k is trying to do too much and are stretching themselves thin in certain areas. I appreciate the effort but I know they can do better.

[Junior Moe]

Quote: Originally Posted by NINJAK2

No one can know whether it's a lazy effort or not until they actually BUY it Junior. To my knowledge no video/screen footage existed of this DLC content prior to release. I don't think people have a problem with buying DLC when it's on the quality level as say Witcher 3. The art department should have put forth a better effort with this DLC. There are current and former members of OS who have done better work on CAPS for legend rosters for free than 2k did for pay. I think 2k is trying to do too much and are stretching themselves thin in certain areas. I appreciate the effort but I know they can do better.

No. You could have have simple read the description of it prior to purchase. It says exactly what it is. If that's not up to your quality standards then it's simple enough what to do. Implying that the effort was lazy is very much an opinion. It's as simple as that. Also, you can only speak for yourself with regards to what people will buy DLC wise. I personally think its fine. Im onboars with anything college related. Others think its fine as well. Many here don't. It is what it is. Take it or leave it.

[NINJAK2]

Quote: Originally Posted by Junior Moe

No. You could have have simple read the description of it prior to purchase. It says exactly what it is. If that's not up to your quality standards then it's simple enough what to do. Implying that the effort was lazy is very much an opinion. It's as simple as that. Also, you can only speak for yourself with regards to what people will buy DLC wise. I personally think its fine. Im onboars with anything college related. Others think its fine as well. Many here don't. It is what it is. Take it or leave it.

You got me jr. It was my fault for expecting a little better out of this DLC. I wish I had slightly lower standards such as yourself in order to accept what they gave me and give 2K a gold star. 2K is known for their attention to detail and IMO I don't feel this DLC is a shining example of that. Some of the faces are so bad I even wonder why they paid for the rights for players like Danny Manning to do them like they do. I really hope 2K doesn't consider this effort the gold standard and repeat the same thing next year. I don't think I need to take a poll to come to the conclusion that everyone wants quality DLC. Of course opinions can differ on what is quality. Really happy you and a few others are completely satisfied but if you don't think they can do better than this you must have a much lower opinion of them than I.

[timothythefirst]

this is a cool concept but really not worth the price.

especially with how weird some of the rosters are.

just looking at the msu team because that's the team I know best, some of the best msu players ever are missing from the team and they included a few guys who were decent but not great. no mateen cleaves? no scott skiles? shawn respert? shannon brown? but branden dawson is on it? and sam vincent was good but not better than any of the guys i just mentioned...

Jason Richardson is the only player from the 2000 national championship team and he wasn't even a star on that team, he didn't break out until 2001 and then entered the draft after that season...

i'm assuming there's some of the same issues with other teams i just don't know their history quite as well.

[MasonOS95]

No Mo Pete... thats wack