NBA 2K17 Player Ratings & Screenshots (More Added as They Are Revealed)

[ForeverVersatile]

Stop making excuses for all the blatant mess up's. There's no reason Seth Curry should look like that or any of the other players with insanely off body types.

If there is a reason I think we deserve an explanation. That way I know if I need to hold off on purchasing. I doubt we will get an explanation, they just want us to pre-order.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Vni]

Quote: Originally Posted by ForeverVersatile

Stop making excuses for all the blatant mess up's. There's no reason Seth Curry should look like that or any of the other players with insanely off body types. If there is a reason I think we deserve an explanation. That way I know if I need to hold off on purchasing. I doubt we will get an explanation, they just want us to pre-order. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who's making excuses ? I understand body models accuracy are important to some of you but relax, wow. Some guys are a little off and that's to be expected. Man first world problems at it's finest.

There are too many different conversations mixed up in here anyway.

[WISports]

FTR, I think the 2K guys do a great job and overall I love these games. I actually enjoy NBA 2K over Madden and MLB The Show.

I just have issue with the art department. I have issue with the inaccuracies that should be an easy fix.

Making players' arms/legs at least close to what they should look like should not be this hard. Getting uniform colors correct should not be that hard. Same with court colors/shades.

These are the type of things that cause people to make the 'lazy' and 'lacking attention to detail' comments. And I think it's warranted in this instance.

[Hopsin]

We need gameplay.. Hopefully we get a couple blogs this week bc this screenshot thread is filled with conspiracy and randomness.
We need something other than screenshots of random players.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gosens6]

When we still can't put a headband on players on the Neo and Scorpio, I'm going to die laughing remembering some of the ludicrous things said in this thread

[ForeverVersatile]

Quote: Originally Posted by Vni

Who's making excuses ? I understand body models accuracy are important to some of you but relax, wow. Some guys are a little off and that's to be expected. Man first world problems at it's finest. There are too many different conversations mixed up in here anyway.

Why are you telling me to relax? I'm not cursing or saying anyone need to be fired or anything like that. I understand some you just want to play the game and probably don't care. I care how the game looks first before anything else. What's the point of a face scan while the body is totally off?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[gabri3l3]

Quote: Originally Posted by WISports

FTR, I think the 2K guys do a great job and overall I love these games. I actually enjoy NBA 2K over Madden and MLB The Show. I just have issue with the art department. I have issue with the inaccuracies that should be an easy fix. Making players' arms/legs at least close to what they should look like should not be this hard. Getting uniform colors correct should not be that hard. Same with court colors/shades. These are the type of things that cause people to make the 'lazy' and 'lacking attention to detail' comments. And I think it's warranted in this instance.

Absolutely. We are talking about things that any PC modder can get right in a day of work. These are paid professionals and shoulder size, uniform colors ecc... don't require any technical advancements.

That's why I'm supporting the idea that is not in their best interest from a business perspective to "give the best" now. Every year they obviously need "new" features to sell the game. I think its easy as that.

[Sinner]

Question here, how many of you are not going to buy the game because many of the player models are so off? I'm not saying it isn't a big deal cause they are wrong. I miss many of the problems many of you catch or just look over it as long as the core game play is good and I'm having fun and I myself think those player models aren't good and need changing so I'm actually just curious.

I do think though to say the art team doesn't know anatomy or is incompetent is pretty absurd. The way the animation/game moves you would have to know a little something about anatomy....yes I know the Art department does the skin and "maybe" not the animation or "skeleton" but to put what we see on that and not have it look all stupid while in motion you HAVE to know something about anatomy and can't be incompetent.

I myself draw but do not know all the little things about animation so asking a question here for those who do know. I play in broadcast view which is a little further back than this picture so from that angle the model doesn't look as bad and you would not see all the muscle definition.



That you would need as you bring the camera closer and play in a more zoomed in view or definitely in replays. Obviously they can't have 2 different player models for everybody in the game I am assuming that would be a camera view thing? So how difficult would it be to have something in the game that registers the closer you bring the camera view the more muscle definition you would see? Essentially the model would be changing as you get closer so how difficult is this to do?

Again I think they need to do something to change them and this isn't an excuse...either way I will enjoy the hell out of the game as always