Madden NFL 17 Team Ratings - NFC (Overall, Offense & Defense)

[Hova57]

Quote: Originally Posted by charter04

Guess the Eagles whole SB era means nothing since they have never won a SB right? I don't agree. Some really good teams don't win the SB. Some get hot at just the right time. Eli's SB wins Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You can have a great season and still under achieve..I would think all players think that way..if you're a team player individual stats don't matter if you didn't reach the goal

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

[DaCode10]

Quote: Originally Posted by Birdman18

The Lions are rated higher than the Vikings?! Wow, I've seen it all now Edit: I now see it's out of order slightly, but even still.. Lions at 80 and the Vikings at 81 is laughable. Lions lost their 2nd best player in franchise history and added no one to boost that squad.

These ratings are a complete joke lol, the fact that the Vikings won the division and are rated lower than the Packers is just one example, but Packers 85 DEF!? Yeaaaahhhh right...

[DaCode10]

Quote: Originally Posted by jpdavis82

GB has better DB and K and Coach Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Green Bay has a top 3 safety now? People sleep on Xavier Rhodes to

Oh I almost missed the better coach part... McCarthy is a joke Rodgers carries him year to year...

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by noplace

Yet the Cowgirls go out there and draft a RB #4 overall after signing Alfred Morris? So if the OL is that great why are you drafting a RB? Should be able to plug anyone in behind that wall right? McFadden barely rushed over a thousand yards behind that great line so was it the OL or the RB? Yes I agree that Dallas has one of the best OL out there but that was based off 2 years ago with Murray plus their draft positions. Tyrone Smith is the only OL that should be rated in the 90's Imo. The others should be high 80's at the most. Take the same players and put them on another team I guarantee they aren't rated as high.

The very fact you used Cowgirls speaks volumes. Most look at McFadden's season as proof that the OL is good.

A normal 3.4 YPC back averages 4.5 and at times looked like a pro bowler even though the had no passing game most games so it was against 8 in the box.

How does that make the OL look worse.

Also would you want to get a great back in a situation like that.

We see how Murray looked when he ran behind a different line


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by Hova57

You can have a great season and still under achieve..I would think all players think that way..if you're a team player individual stats don't matter if you didn't reach the goal Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Guess you don't watch shows like All or Nothing and see how excited guys get to make the pro bowl.

Only one team wins it all. It doesn't mean everyone else is trash


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by Hova57

Yup like I said at least have lower pass blocking Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Based on what? Romo getting hurt? They didn't give up many sacks. Just because the QB gets hurt on one sack doesn't mean they don't block well.

If you can offer some actual data I'm all ears. If it's just Eagle fan bias then I'm not sure it's a good point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[noplace]

Quote: Originally Posted by charter04

The very fact you used Cowgirls speaks volumes. Most look at McFadden's season as proof that the OL is good. A normal 3.4 YPC back averages 4.5 and at times looked like a pro bowler even though the had no passing game most games so it was against 8 in the box. How does that make the OL look worse. Also would you want to get a great back in a situation like that. We see how Murray looked when he ran behind a different line Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I never reference Dallas respectfully. Come on now, Murray was a bad fit in Kelly's offense and a horrible signing. Like I said why did they feel to draft a RB if they made a 3.4 back into a 4.5? Murray made that line look just as good as they made him.

[Hooe]

Quote: Originally Posted by noplace

I never reference Dallas respectfully.

And yet you expect to be taken seriously when giving opinions about them?

Quote:

Come on now, Murray was a bad fit in Kelly's offense and a horrible signing. Like I said why did they feel to draft a RB if they made a 3.4 back into a 4.5? Murray made that line look just as good as they made him.

Running backs do more than run the ball. Ezekiel Elliott is one of the more highly-regarded pass-blocking running backs to come out of the draft in years. The Cowboys clearly want to foremost keep Romo upright - because their passing offense crumbles without him - and second make the transition to life after Romo easier on the next guy - be it Prescott, Showers, or more likely a player not yet on the roster.