Madden NFL 17 Player Ratings - Top 5 Wide Receivers

[Yazan Gable]

Quote: Originally Posted by StayPlation82

How do you make a player in the video game who is user controlled, who waits to throw to an open WR and who doesn't have to practice or watch film a bad player?

You don't, you yourself represent the hesitation and decision making of a QB. As far as AI is concerned that would probably be influenced by low Awareness (Justin Blackmon has great ratings but his Awareness is in the low 40s so it crushes his OVR), but when they're in your hands you take the place of their decision making. Which is fine with me, I'd be frustrated if the game decided messing with my inputs by delaying them (which it already does sometimes).

[champ1997]

Josh Gordon has been reinstated I wonder what his ratings will be

[jpdavis82]

You guys probably know this already but Dez is 8th


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The JareBear]

Quote: Originally Posted by jpdavis82

You guys probably know this already but Dez is 8th Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That makes me think DT probably isn't in the top 10, which honestly doesn't bother me at all. I could see DT being around 85-88

[StayPlation82]

i'm thinking in the 85 OVR range, hopefully a little higher

[BayRaider510]

Quote: Originally Posted by BreakingBad2013

That's my point. I prefer a spread. I'd like to see a 0-100 scale. But looking at the top 5 WRs, there are another 6 or 7, maybe even 8 or 9 that have to be up there. I think ratings will again be inflated, because they try to fit all of the NFL players from about 55/60-99. Where it should be 1-99. Especially squeezing 2200 or so players into 39 rating numbers. That gives you 57 players per rating number. From our Madden experiences we look at some 70s as starters based on their skills. Imagine having: Tom Brady 94 Matt Ryan 76 Sam Bradford 66 Kevin Kolb 43 Jamarcus Russel 13 Or something like: Darrell REVIS 90 Jason Varrett 75 Jalen Ramsay 62 Dimitri Patterson 48 Etc. You'd have a legit amount of super stars, feeling elite. And bums would be bums, huge liabilities. Imagine the draft impact of you draft a 21 overall player first round, and pickup a 67 overall in the 6th round! Overalls: 0-10 can't even get a tryout 11-20 project, has physical tools, just not technical or intangibles. 21-30 practice squad project 31-40 bench player 41-50 fringe starter 51-60 average starter 61-70 solid starter, just really solid in what he does. 71-80 really good player, not HOF caliber, but Pro bowl potential 81-89 Excellent player, just right under HOF, consistent All Pro, just not ground breaking 90+ First ballot HOF

I've always wondered why EA doesn't use the full 100 point scale. There's usually never any players below 55 overall.

[Yazan Gable]

Quote: Originally Posted by BayRaider510

I've always wondered why EA doesn't use the full 100 point scale. There's usually never any players below 55 overall.

Move a kicker to QB.

[GoJags904]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yazan Gable

Move a kicker to QB.

So how long before anyone wakes up and says, "why have a 0-100 scale if you shouldn't use it all." If jj Watt is stonwalled isn't that high schoolish ratings issues. Isn't my qb at 90+ in short, medium, n deep passing not suppose to throw the ball 10 yards over the receiver just because with no wind. Be real because running from problems never fixed anything and if this board is about covering up Madden and just pretending to want feedback on the flaws of the game then state it as such. I don't want to rant like that but every time I see solutions to a problem year in and year out it's mostly don't beat a dead horse responses from a board preaching change. In done and AR15 being snubbed just shows me stats and actual game film don't account for everyone in the league.

Sent from my LGMS428 using Tapatalk