MLB The Show 16 OSFM HYBRID V1 Roster Available Now

[tzinc]

There is something really wrong with people.
All this hard work is done for free and they are griping about it.

If they don't like it spend weeks MAKING your OWN rosters lol! Or just don't play this roster.
Ridiculous negativity and entitlement.

[PVarck31]

Quote: Originally Posted by Nulap

Given that all players are rated using the same system I believe that complaints should be forwarded to: http://steamerprojections.com/blog/about-2/ from what I've seen so far people only seem to be at odds with 1 or 2 players. If there were issues with say 20 or more I could see questioning the system, with 1 or 2 it seems, to me, it may be a personal bias.

Well if you don't see A potential in Lindor than it may be your bias.

But it comes down to what the rosters makers think so they are free to have their opinion too.

[PVarck31]

Quote: Originally Posted by tzinc

there is something really wrong with people all this hard work for free and they are griping about it if they don't like it spend hours MAKING your OWN rosters lol ridiculous

Why are people not allowed to have opinions on the rosters?

[PVarck31]

Quote: Originally Posted by tzinc

opinions are like a$$holes everyone has one

Very nice!

[Nulap]

Quote: Originally Posted by PVarck31

Well if you don't see A potential in Lindor than it may be your bias. But it comes down to what the rosters makers think so they are free to have their opinion too.

That's just it, it's not what they think. I'm not saying you shouldn't have an opinion, everyone should. But these ratings are not what the roster creators "think" it's what the projections state. The problem people have is with the system, people are mad because one or two guys isn't rated how they like. If the roster creators pulled these ratings out of their asses then by all means complain to them. Since, however, they used a pre-existing projection system it is not the roster you have an issue with, it's the projections.



If there were issues with many other players you may be able to justify an issue with interpretation of the projections, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

Sorry for the edit, had to change a diaper (and no, it wasn't mine)

[PVarck31]

Quote: Originally Posted by Nulap

That's just it, it's not what they think. I'm not saying you shouldn't have an opinion, everyone should. But these ratings are not what the roster creators "think" it's what the projections state. The problem people have is with the system, people are mad because one or two guys isn't rated how they like. If the roster creators pulled these ratings out of their asses then by all means complain to them. Since, however, they used a pre-existing projection system it is not the roster you have an issue with, it's the projections. If there were issues with many other players you may be able to justify an issue with interpretation of the projections, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Sorry for the edit, had to change a diaper (and no, it wasn't mine)

That's fair enough. I admit I don't know the ins and outs of how these guys make the rosters. And I very much appreciate the work they do so I am in no way putting them down.

I just believe Lindor should be an A. I think a lot of people would agree. But like you said, whatever they use to determine that doesn't agree. And that's fine, I understand, and will still enjoy the rosters.

[WaitTilNextYear]

Quote: Originally Posted by ShowTyme15

Try importing Dayan Viciedo over him and re-create him. I did this with a player last night and it worked. Also another weird thing happened RussCanzler, Jake Fox, and Blake Tekotte had a stats glitch after I imported them over legends then I went and checked them last night and somehow their stas reset and everything is normal now.

Are you suggesting that Dayan Viciedo is the Keymaster?

[WaitTilNextYear]

Quote: Originally Posted by PVarck31

That's fair enough. I admit I don't know the ins and outs of how these guys make the rosters. And I very much appreciate the work they do so I am in no way putting them down. I just believe Lindor should be an A. I think a lot of people would agree. But like you said, whatever they use to determine that doesn't agree. And that's fine, I understand, and will still enjoy the rosters.

Fair point, but keep in mind that while a lot of people are loosely tossing "A" and "B" around, we're really talking about an 88 POT, which is a super high B. And I'd guess most who don't agree would consider Lindor a low A. So we're really one "stock is rising" email apart. It's really not that big of a difference.

I should also mention that we've made a conscious effort to be conservative with potentials to help the superstars really stand out.