More Links

PPerfect_CJ · 05-06-2016, 05:07 PM

LOLOLOLOL!!!

Dogslax41 · 05-06-2016, 05:13 PM

He's a ticket seller. The players they would get back would not result in equal revenue generation even if they never are competitive with Trout on the roster.

CubFan23 · 05-06-2016, 05:55 PM

Shouldn't this thread be posted here? http://www.operationsports.com/forums/pro-baseball/

Just sayin, if one of us posted it, it would be moved to that thread.

orion523 · 05-06-2016, 06:13 PM

If Trout were say 27, the yes, it's a no brainier. But at 24, he's still young enough to focus a rebuild around, so to answer your question, no the Angels should not trade Mike Trout.

Ghost Of The Year · 05-06-2016, 06:32 PM

Yes. The Angels should trade Trout to Atlanta for a bag of balls & an usher to be named later.
Then Anaheim/LA/California/whatever-they-go-by-these-days can begin to rebuild around Weaver & Pujols, the two obvious pieces to any Angel future. Keeping Trout this year is exactly why the Angels lost prize centerfield top prospect Gary Brown. If they don't dump Trout ASAP, they're in danger of also losing another centerfielder, Bo Way.
Oh, wait, NVM, I thought we were talking about Steve Trout.

bigdipper88 · 05-06-2016, 06:33 PM

Weaver and Wilson come off the books, so that's some $ they'll have. Pujols has them tied up and he obviously isn't /hasn't been even near the player he was in STL.

tonybologna · 05-06-2016, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misterkrabz


	No. Makes no sense to trade the best player in baseball, specially if you have him locked up until 2020..you would never get the same value in return. ..if it was 2019 and you thought you couldn't resign him, then yes...consider it.

You hit the nail on the head as to why I've said the same thing. He probably still is the best player in baseball but Bryce Harper is coming fast but no way he should be traded.

bestbrother · 05-06-2016, 07:01 PM

I assume we are talking in game (in the main here) and for me, as the Angels are the team I am thinking about playing as, then its a no.

1 - Trout will be fun to play with and thats a big part of why id be the Angels
2 - Im not sure what he would command in terms of in game trade value
3 - As its a game, there is always a way to work things. Sure some players may not stack up irl, but who is to say they wont play well in the Show
4 - Related to the above, the Angels without Trout lose some of their identity (if that makes sense)

05-06-2016, 05:07 PM	#9
PPerfect_CJ MVP OVR: 8 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Caruthersville, MO	Re: Is It Time For The Angels to Trade Mike Trout? LOLOLOLOL!!! __________________ #LFC #ChiefsKingdom #STLCards #WeAreND

05-06-2016, 05:55 PM	#11
CubFan23 MVP OVR: 23 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Right Field Ivy Posts: 3,994	Re: Is It Time For The Angels to Trade Mike Trout? Shouldn't this thread be posted here? http://www.operationsports.com/forums/pro-baseball/ Just sayin, if one of us posted it, it would be moved to that thread. TheBallGuru, dickey1331, TheBleedingRed21 and 7 others like this. __________________ Playstation Network:That70s_Gamer “I knew when my career was over. In 1965 my baseball card came out with no picture". - Bob Uecker

05-06-2016, 06:13 PM	#12
orion523 All Star OVR: 21 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Philadelphia	Re: Is It Time For The Angels to Trade Mike Trout? If Trout were say 27, the yes, it's a no brainier. But at 24, he's still young enough to focus a rebuild around, so to answer your question, no the Angels should not trade Mike Trout. tonybologna likes this.

05-06-2016, 06:32 PM	#13
Ghost Of The Year METROPOLITANKNICKERBOCKER OVR: 0 Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Rock; Hard Place. Posts: 5,220	Re: Is It Time For The Angels to Trade Mike Trout? Yes. The Angels should trade Trout to Atlanta for a bag of balls & an usher to be named later. Then Anaheim/LA/California/whatever-they-go-by-these-days can begin to rebuild around Weaver & Pujols, the two obvious pieces to any Angel future. Keeping Trout this year is exactly why the Angels lost prize centerfield top prospect Gary Brown. If they don't dump Trout ASAP, they're in danger of also losing another centerfielder, Bo Way. Oh, wait, NVM, I thought we were talking about Steve Trout. Jeffrey Smith and tonybologna like this. __________________ Good evening people, welcome to the show Got something here I want you all to know When life and people bring on primal screams You got to think of what it's going to take to make your dreams

05-06-2016, 07:01 PM	#16
bestbrother Pro OVR: 0 Join Date: Sep 2015	Re: Is It Time For The Angels to Trade Mike Trout? I assume we are talking in game (in the main here) and for me, as the Angels are the team I am thinking about playing as, then its a no. 1 - Trout will be fun to play with and thats a big part of why id be the Angels 2 - Im not sure what he would command in terms of in game trade value 3 - As its a game, there is always a way to work things. Sure some players may not stack up irl, but who is to say they wont play well in the Show 4 - Related to the above, the Angels without Trout lose some of their identity (if that makes sense)

	Why Player Ratings Change When Starting Dynasty Mode in College Football 25
	What Is Pro Yakyuu Spirits 2024/Professional Baseball Spirits 2024, and How Do You Get It?
	The House Rules Hub for Recruiting in College Football 25 Dynasty Mode

05-06-2016, 05:13 PM	#10
Dogslax41 MVP OVR: 10 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Jacksonville Posts: 1,905	He's a ticket seller. The players they would get back would not result in equal revenue generation even if they never are competitive with Trout on the roster.

05-06-2016, 06:33 PM	#14
bigdipper88 Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Apr 2008	Weaver and Wilson come off the books, so that's some $ they'll have. Pujols has them tied up and he obviously isn't /hasn't been even near the player he was in STL.

More Links

Is It Time For The Angels to Trade Mike Trout?